Comparison of excavation-induced wall deflection using top-down and bottom-up construction methods in Taipei silty clay

被引:36
|
作者
Kung, Gordon Tung-Chin [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Sustainable Environm Res Ctr, Tainan 70944, Taiwan
关键词
Excavation; Case history; Clay; Finite element method; Creep; BRACED EXCAVATIONS; DEEP EXCAVATIONS; GROUND MOVEMENTS; PERFORMANCE; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.compgeo.2008.07.001
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
This paper compares the excavation-induced wall deflection caused by the top-down method (TDM) and the bottom-up method (BUM). First, a total of 26 quality excavation case histories in Taipei silty clay were collected and analyzed. The field observations show that the maximum lateral wall deflection (delta(hm)) induced by the TDM were 1.28 times as large as that induced by the BUM. Factors affecting wall deflection are investigated and four of them are selected for further numerical experimentation to investigate the discrepancy of delta(hm) caused by the two methods. Analysis results showed that the average ratio of delta(hm) induced by the TDM over that induced by the BUM is approximately equal to 1.1, excluding the effect of thermal shrinkage of concrete floor slabs. Both observed data and analysis results revealed that greater delta(hm), is generally induced by the TDM despite its use of floor slabs with higher support stiffness. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:373 / 385
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] BOTTOM-UP AND TOP-DOWN TREE TRANSFORMATIONS - COMPARISON
    ENGELFRIET, J
    MATHEMATICAL SYSTEMS THEORY, 1975, 9 (03): : 198 - 231
  • [2] Hierarchical MTW zeolites in tetrahydropyranylation of alcohols: Comparison of bottom-up and top-down methods
    Vesely, Ondrej
    Pang, Hao
    Vornholt, Simon M.
    Mazur, Michal
    Yu, Jihong
    Opanasenko, Maksym
    Eliasova, Pavia
    CATALYSIS TODAY, 2019, 324 : 123 - 134
  • [3] Top-down and bottom-up eddy motion in wall bounded turbulence
    Carlotti, P.
    Laadhari, F.
    ADVANCES IN TURBULENCE XII - PROCEEDINGS OF THE 12TH EUROMECH EUROPEAN TURBULENCE CONFERENCE, 2009, 132 : 389 - 392
  • [4] The Construction of Interest Communities: Distinguishing Bottom-Up and Top-Down Models
    Lowery, David
    Gray, Virginia
    Monogan, James
    JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 2008, 70 (04): : 1160 - 1176
  • [5] Top-Down and Bottom-Up Strategies of Identity Construction in Ethnic Media
    De Fina, Anna
    APPLIED LINGUISTICS, 2013, 34 (05) : 554 - 573
  • [6] Analyzing the contribution of top-down and bottom-up methods to the construction of synthetic microbial communities in Jiuyao
    Peng, Qi
    Quan, Leping
    Zheng, Huajun
    Li, Jiachen
    Xie, Guangfa
    FOOD MICROBIOLOGY, 2025, 129
  • [7] Downsizing metal–organic frameworks by bottom-up and top-down methods
    Ken Aldren S. Usman
    James W. Maina
    Shayan Seyedin
    Marlon T. Conato
    Leon M. Payawan
    Ludovic F. Dumée
    Joselito M. Razal
    NPG Asia Materials, 2020, 12
  • [8] EQUIVALENCE OF TWO HEALTHCARE COSTING METHODS: BOTTOM-UP AND TOP-DOWN
    Chapko, Michael K.
    Liu, Chuan-Fen
    Perkins, Mark
    Li, Yu-Fang
    Fortney, John C.
    Maciejewski, Matthew L.
    HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2009, 18 (10) : 1188 - 1201
  • [9] Comparison of Bottom-Up and Top-Down Procedures for Water Demand Reconstruction
    Fiorillo, Diana
    Creaco, Enrico
    De Paola, Francesco
    Giugni, Maurizio
    WATER, 2020, 12 (03)
  • [10] Top-down and bottom-up modulation of pain-induced oscillations
    Hauck, Michael
    Domnick, Claudia
    Lorenz, Juergen
    Gerloff, Christian
    Engel, Andreas K.
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2015, 9