Comparison of Mortality Risk Models in Patients with Postcardiac Arrest Cardiogenic Shock and Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support

被引:3
|
作者
Chatzis, Georgios [1 ]
Markus, Birgit [1 ]
Syntila, Styliani [1 ]
Waechter, Christian [1 ]
Luesebrink, Ulrich [1 ]
Ahrens, Holger [1 ]
Divchev, Dimitar [1 ]
Schieffer, Bernhard [1 ]
Karatolios, Konstantinos [1 ]
机构
[1] Philipps Univ Marburg, Dept Cardiol Angiol & Intens Care, Marburg, Germany
关键词
HOSPITAL CARDIAC-ARREST; ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; EXTRACORPOREAL MEMBRANE-OXYGENATION; PREDICTING SURVIVAL; MANAGEMENT; OUTCOMES; DEVICE; RETURN; SCORE;
D O I
10.1155/2021/8843935
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background. Although scoring systems are widely used to predict outcomes in postcardiac arrest cardiogenic shock (CS) after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) complicating acute myocardial infarction (AMI), data concerning the accuracy of these scores to predict mortality of patients treated with Impella in this setting are lacking. Thus, we aimed to evaluate as well as to compare the prognostic accuracy of acute physiology and chronic health II (APACHE II), simplified acute physiology score II (SAPS II), sepsis-related organ failure assessment (SOFA), the intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), CardShock, the prediction of cardiogenic shock outcome for AMI patients salvaged by VA-ECMO (ENCOURAGE), and the survival after venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (SAVE) score in patients with OHCA refractory CS due to an AMI treated with Impella 2.5 or CP. Methods. Retrospective study of 65 consecutive Impella 2.5 and 32 CP patients treated in our cardiac arrest center from September 2015 until June 2020. Results. Overall survival to discharge was 44.3%. The expected mortality according to scores was SOFA 70%, SAPS II 90%, IABP shock 55%, CardShock 80%, APACHE II 85%, ENCOURAGE 50%, and SAVE score 70% in the 2.5 group; SOFA 70%, SAPS II 85%, IABP shock 55%, CardShock 80%, APACHE II 85%, ENCOURAGE 75%, and SAVE score 70% in the CP group. The ENCOURAGE score was the most effective predictive model of mortality outcome presenting a moderate area under the curve (AUC) of 0.79, followed by the CardShock, APACHE II, IABP, and SAPS score. These derived an AUC between 0.71 and 0.78. The SOFA and the SAVE scores failed to predict the outcome in this particular setting of refractory CS after OHCA due to an AMI. Conclusion. The available intensive care and newly developed CS scores offered only a moderate prognostic accuracy for outcomes in OHCA patients with refractory CS due to an AMI treated with Impella. A new score is needed in order to guide the therapy in these patients.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Mechanical Circulatory Support for AMI and Cardiogenic Shock
    Abu-Omar, Yasir
    Tsui, Steven S. L.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 2010, 25 (04) : 434 - 441
  • [42] Temporary mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock
    Obradovic, Danilo
    Freund, Anne
    Feistritzer, Hans-Josef
    Sulimov, Dmitry
    Loncar, Goran
    Abdel-Wahab, Mohamed
    Zeymer, Uwe
    Desch, Steffen
    Thiele, Holger
    PROGRESS IN CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES, 2021, 69 : 35 - 46
  • [43] Outcomes of nonemergent percutaneous coronary intervention requiring mechanical circulatory support in patients without cardiogenic shock
    Al-khadra, Yasser
    Alraies, M. Chadi
    Darmoch, Fahed
    Pacha, Homam M.
    Soud, Mohamad
    Kaki, Amir
    Rab, Tanveer
    Grines, Cindy L.
    Meraj, Pewaiz
    Alaswad, Khaldoon
    Kwok, Chun S.
    Mamas, Mamas
    Kapadia, Samir
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2020, 95 (03) : 503 - 512
  • [44] MINIMALLY INVASIVE MECHANICAL CIRCULATORY SUPPORT IN THE MANAGEMENT OF CARDIOGENIC SHOCK AND REFRACTORY CARDIAC ARREST
    Ostadal, P.
    Kruger, A.
    Vondrakova, D.
    Kmonicek, P.
    Mates, M.
    Skabradova, M.
    Horakova, S.
    Kopriva, K.
    Doubek, D.
    Jehlicka, P.
    Neuzil, P.
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2013, 39 : S367 - S367
  • [45] IMPACT OF OBESITY ON PATIENTS WITH CARDIOGENIC SHOCK ON TEMPORARY MECHANICAL CIRCULATORY SUPPORT
    Nair, Raunak M.
    Saleem, Talha
    Vural, Adil
    Chawla, Sanchit
    Singh, Abhayjit
    Higgins, Andrew
    Lee, Ran
    Reed, Grant W.
    Rampersad, Penelope
    Cremer, Paul
    Menon, Venu
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2023, 81 (08) : 681 - 681
  • [46] Complications of Temporary Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support for Cardiogenic Shock: An Appraisal of Contemporary Literature
    Subramaniam, Anna V.
    Barsness, Gregory W.
    Vallabhajosyula, Saarwaani
    Vallabhajosyula, Saraschandra
    CARDIOLOGY AND THERAPY, 2019, 8 (02) : 211 - 228
  • [47] ACUTE ANEMIA IN CARDIOGENIC SHOCK PATIENTS WITH MECHANICAL CIRCULATORY SUPPORT DEVICES
    Said, Raghad
    Aguiar, Taylor
    Beil, Conor
    Stuart, Andrea
    Grinn, Micheal
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2025, 53 (01)
  • [48] Outcomes of obesity in cardiogenic shock patients requiring mechanical circulatory support
    Shekhar, Shashank
    Kaw, Roop
    Agrawal, Ankit
    Isogai, Toshiaki
    Lak, Hassan
    Mahalwar, Gauranga
    Pampori, Adam
    Reed, Grant
    Menon, Venu
    Kapadia, Samir R.
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2023, 102 (05) : 914 - 916
  • [49] Complication Rates Of Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support In Patients With Cardiogenic Shock
    Sheffield, Eric
    Scott, Monte
    Kyriakopoulos, Christos P.
    Krauspe, Ethan
    Taleb, Iosif
    Chang, Derek K.
    Sideris, Konstantinos
    Wever-Pinzon, Omar
    Tandar, Anwar
    Goodwin, Matthew L.
    Tseliou, Eleni
    Hamouche, Rana
    Welt, Frederick G.
    Tonna, Joseph E.
    Hanff, Thomas C.
    Drakos, Stavros G.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE, 2024, 30 (01) : 149 - 149
  • [50] The Impella Device for Acute Mechanical Circulatory Support in Patients in Cardiogenic Shock
    Lemaire, Anthony
    Anderson, Mark B.
    Lee, Leonard Y.
    Scholz, Peter
    Prendergast, Thomas
    Goodman, Andrew
    Lozano, Ann Marie
    Spotnitz, Alan
    Batsides, George
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2014, 97 (01): : 133 - 138