The construct validity of the category test: Is it a measure of reasoning or intelligence?

被引:24
|
作者
Johnstone, B [1 ]
Holland, D [1 ]
Hewett, JE [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV MISSOURI, SCH MED, DEPT STAT, COLUMBIA, MO 65212 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1037/1040-3590.9.1.28
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Although the Category Test (mi C. Halstead, 1947) is generally described as a measure of abstract reasoning, determination of its construct validity has been difficult given methodological inconsistencies of previous studies. It has been suggested that the Category Test measures intelligence (G. J. Boyle, 1988), although others suggest it measures distinct reasoning processes (M. D. Kelly, D. K. Kundert, & R. S. Dean, 1992; K. Perrine, 1993). This study investigated the construct validity of the Category Test for 308 participants with heterogeneous cognitive dysfunction. A factor analysis using measures of reasoning (Category subtests), intelligence (Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised; D. Wechsler, 1981), memory (Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised; D. Wechsler, 1987), and other ''problem solving'' abilities (Trail Making Test; Army Individual Test Battery, 1944; Tactual Performance Test; W. C. Halstead, 1947) indicated the Category subtests to load on 3 factors distinct from intelligence (and other neuropsychological measures), labeled as follows: Symbol Recognition/ Counting (Subtests 1 and 2); Spatial Position Reasoning (Subtests 3, 4, and 7); and Proportional Reasoning (Subtests 5 and 6). Clinical implications are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:28 / 33
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Construct Validity of the Autism Impact Measure (AIM)
    Mazurek, Micah O.
    Carlson, Coleen
    Baker-Ericzen, Mary
    Butter, Eric
    Norris, Megan
    Kanne, Stephen
    JOURNAL OF AUTISM AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS, 2020, 50 (07) : 2307 - 2319
  • [32] Construct Validity of the Autism Impact Measure (AIM)
    Micah O. Mazurek
    Coleen Carlson
    Mary Baker-Ericzén
    Eric Butter
    Megan Norris
    Stephen Kanne
    Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 2020, 50 : 2307 - 2319
  • [33] Cultural intelligence: Construct and criterion related validity
    Tang Ningyu
    Fu Jia
    Dai Naling
    Li Xiaofei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 43 (3-4) : 605 - 605
  • [34] Measuring Intelligence in 3 Min: Concurrent, Convergent and Discriminant Validity of the Baddeley Reasoning Test
    Furnham, Adrian
    APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 38 (06)
  • [35] RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF HALSTEAD CATEGORY TEST
    SHAW, DJ
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1966, 22 (02) : 176 - &
  • [36] TEST BIAS AND CONSTRUCT-VALIDITY
    JENSEN, AR
    PHI DELTA KAPPAN, 1976, 58 (04) : 340 - 346
  • [38] Construct validity of the Life Orientation Test
    Terrill, DR
    Friedman, DG
    Gottschalk, LA
    Haaga, DAF
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 2002, 79 (03) : 550 - 563
  • [39] The Pillbox Test: Does It Have Sufficient Construct Validity as a Measure of Instrumental Activities of Daily Living?
    Marceaux, Janice C.
    Valencia, Julianna P.
    Carter, Kirstine R.
    Chicota-Carroll, Cammy
    Peak, Ashley M.
    ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 37 (06) : 1381 - 1381
  • [40] Construct validity and test-retest reliability of a date rape decision-latency measure
    Jeffrey A. Bernat
    Stephanie Stolp
    Karen S. Calhoun
    Henry E. Adams
    Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 1997, 19 : 315 - 330