共 50 条
Predictors of Donor Follow-Up After Living Donor Liver Transplantation
被引:14
|作者:
Brown, Robert S., Jr.
[1
]
Smith, Abigail R.
[2
,3
]
Dew, Mary Amanda
[4
,5
,6
,7
]
Gillespie, Brenda W.
[2
]
Hill-Callahan, Peg
[3
]
Ladner, Daniela P.
[8
]
机构:
[1] Columbia Univ Coll Phys & Surg, Dept Med, New York, NY 10032 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Biostat, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Arbor Res Collaborat Hlth, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Psychiat, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[5] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Psychol, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[6] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Epidemiol, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA
[7] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Biostat, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA
[8] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Dept Surg, Div Transplantat, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
关键词:
QUALITY-OF-LIFE;
HEPATIC LOBE DONORS;
RIGHT LOBECTOMY;
DONATION;
OUTCOMES;
MORBIDITY;
RISKS;
D O I:
10.1002/lt.23912
中图分类号:
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Donor safety in living liver donation is of paramount importance; however, information on long-term outcomes is limited by incomplete follow-up. We sought to ascertain factors that predicted postdonation follow-up in 456 living liver donors in the Adult-to-Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Cohort Study. Completed donor follow-up was defined as physical, phone, or laboratory contact at a given time point. Univariate and multivariate mixed effects logistic regression models, using donor and recipient demographic and clinical data and donor quality-of-life data, were developed to predict completed follow-up. Ninety percent of the donors completed their follow-up in the first 3 months, and 83% completed their follow-up at year 1; rates of completed follow-up ranged from 57% to 72% in years 2 to 7 and from 41% to 56% in years 8 to 10. The probability of completed follow-up in the first year was higher for white donors [odds ratio (OR) = 3.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) - 1.25-8.58] but lower for donors whose recipients had hepatitis C virus or hepatocellular carcinoma (OR - 0.34, 95% CI = 0.17-0.69). After the first year, an older age at donation predicted more complete follow-up. There were significant center differences at all time points (OR range = 0.29-10.11), with center variability in both returns for in-center visits and the use of phone/long-distance visits. Donor follow-up in the first year after donation was excellent but decreased with time. Predictors of follow-up varied with the time since donation. In conclusion, adapting best center practices (enhanced through the use of telephones and social media) to maintain contact with donors represents a significant opportunity to gain valuable information about long-term donor outcomes. (C) 2014 AASLD.
引用
收藏
页码:967 / 976
页数:10
相关论文