Assessing attentional biases with stuttering

被引:14
|
作者
Lowe, Robyn [1 ]
Menzies, Ross [1 ]
Packman, Ann [1 ]
O'Brian, Sue [1 ]
Jones, Mark [2 ]
Onslow, Mark [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Australian Stuttering Res Ctr, Lidcombe, NSW 1825, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Herston, Qld, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
stuttering; social anxiety disorder; attentional bias; SOCIAL ANXIETY DISORDER; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; EXTERNAL ATTENTION; THREATENING FACES; PHOBIA; ADULTS; AVOIDANCE; SELF; INTERFERENCE; EMOTIONALITY;
D O I
10.1111/1460-6984.12187
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Background: Many adults who stutter presenting for speech treatment experience social anxiety disorder. The presence of mental health disorders in adults who stutter has been implicated in a failure to maintain speech treatment benefits. Contemporary theories of social anxiety disorder propose that the condition is maintained by negative cognitions and information processing biases. Consistent with cognitive theories, the probe detection task has shown that social anxiety is associated with an attentional bias to avoid social information. This information processing bias is suggested to be involved in maintaining anxiety. Evidence is emerging for information processing biases being involved with stuttering. Aims: This study investigated information processing in adults who stutter using the probe detection task. Information processing biases have been implicated in anxiety maintenance in social anxiety disorder and therefore may have implications for the assessment and treatment of stuttering. It was hypothesized that stuttering participants compared with control participants would display an attentional bias to avoid attending to social information. Methods & Procedures: Twenty-three adults who stutter and 23 controls completed a probe detection task in which they were presented with pairs of photographs: a face displaying an emotional expression-positive, negative or neutral-and an everyday household object. All participants were subjected to a mild social threat induction being told they would speak to a small group of people on completion of the task. Outcomes & Results: The stuttering group scored significantly higher than controls for trait anxiety, but did not differ from controls on measures of social anxiety. Non-socially anxious adults who stutter did not display an attentional bias to avoid looking at photographs of faces relative to everyday objects. Higher scores on trait anxiety were positively correlated with attention towards photographs of negative faces. Conclusion & Implications: Attentional biases as assessed by the probe detection task may not be a characteristic of non-socially anxious adults who stutter. A vigilance to attend to threat information with high trait anxiety is consistent with findings of studies using the emotional Stroop task in stuttering and social anxiety disorder. Future research should investigate attentional processing in people who stutter who are socially anxious. It will also be useful for future studies to employ research paradigms that involve speaking. Continued research is warranted to explore information processing and potential biases that could be involved in the maintenance of anxiety and failure to maintain the benefits of speech treatment outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:84 / 94
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Assessing efficacy of stuttering treatments
    Thomas, C
    Howell, P
    JOURNAL OF FLUENCY DISORDERS, 2001, 26 (04) : 311 - 333
  • [32] Assessing risk for stuttering in children
    Howell, Peter
    Lu, Chunming
    JOURNAL OF FLUENCY DISORDERS, 2013, 38 (02) : 63 - 65
  • [33] Body dissatisfaction: Attentional biases and affective consequences
    Janelle, CM
    Hausenblas, HA
    Gardner, RE
    JOURNAL OF SPORT & EXERCISE PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 24 : 74 - 75
  • [34] Contrasting attentional biases in a saccadic choice task
    Ómar I. Jóhannesson
    Árni Kristjánsson
    Jérôme Tagu
    Experimental Brain Research, 2022, 240 : 173 - 187
  • [35] The role of attentional biases in PTSD: Is it interference or facilitation?
    Pineles, Suzanne L.
    Shipherd, Jillian C.
    Welch, Lisa P.
    Yovel, Iftah
    BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 2007, 45 (08) : 1903 - 1913
  • [36] Contrasting attentional biases in a saccadic choice task
    Johannesson, Omar I.
    Kristjansson, Arni
    Tagu, Jerome
    EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2022, 240 (01) : 173 - 187
  • [37] Attentional biases and frontal functioning in anorexia nervosa
    Fassino, S
    Pieró, A
    Daga, GA
    Leombruni, P
    Mortara, P
    Rovera, GG
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EATING DISORDERS, 2002, 31 (03) : 274 - 283
  • [38] Attentional biases in PTSD: More evidence for interference
    Pineles, Suzanne L.
    Shipherd, Jillian C.
    Mostoufi, Sheeva. M.
    Abramovitz, Sarah M.
    Yovel, Iftah
    BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 2009, 47 (12) : 1050 - 1057
  • [39] Measuring Attentional Biases for Threat in Children and Adults
    LoBue, Vanessa
    JOVE-JOURNAL OF VISUALIZED EXPERIMENTS, 2014, (92):
  • [40] Attentional biases for angry faces in unipolar depression
    Leyman, Lemke
    De Raedt, Rudi
    Schacht, Rik
    Koster, Ernst H. W.
    PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2007, 37 (03) : 393 - 402