Computational systems biology of the cell cycle

被引:49
|
作者
Csikasz-Nagy, Attila
机构
[1] The Microsoft Research - University of Trento Centre for Computational and Systems Biology, Povo-Trento I-38100
关键词
cell cycle; computational modeling; historical review; perspectives; systems biology; XENOPUS-OOCYTE EXTRACTS; M-PHASE CONTROL; MATHEMATICAL-MODEL; SACCHAROMYCES-CEREVISIAE; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS; PARAMETER-ESTIMATION; BIFURCATION-ANALYSIS; POSITIVE FEEDBACK; MOLECULAR-MODEL; DIVISION CYCLE;
D O I
10.1093/bib/bbp005
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
One of the early success stories of computational systems biology was the work done on cell-cycle regulation. The earliest mathematical descriptions of cell-cycle control evolved into very complex, detailed computational models that describe the regulation of cell division in many different cell types. On the way these models predicted several dynamical properties and unknown components of the system that were later experimentally verified/identified. Still, research on this field is far from over. We need to understand how the core cell-cycle machinery is controlled by internal and external signals, also in yeast cells and in the more complex regulatory networks of higher eukaryotes. Furthermore, there are many computational challenges what we face as new types of data appear thanks to continuing advances in experimental techniques. We have to deal with cell-to-cell variations, revealed by single cell measurements, as well as the tremendous amount of data flowing from high throughput machines. We need new computational concepts and tools to handle these data and develop more detailed, more precise models of cell-cycle regulation in various organisms. Here we review past and present of computational modeling of cell-cycle regulation, and discuss possible future directions of the field.
引用
收藏
页码:424 / 434
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Computational systems biology - Preface
    Priami, C
    THEORETICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2004, 325 (01) : 1 - 2
  • [22] Optimization in computational systems biology
    Banga, Julio R.
    BMC SYSTEMS BIOLOGY, 2008, 2
  • [23] Computational Systems Biology Platforms
    Vacheva, Ivayla
    Eils, Roland
    IT-INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 48 (03): : 140 - 147
  • [24] Computational models in systems biology
    Laurence Loewe
    Jane Hillston
    Genome Biology, 9 (12)
  • [25] Computational challenges in systems biology
    Heath, Allison P.
    Kavraki, Lydia E.
    COMPUTER SCIENCE REVIEW, 2009, 3 (01) : 1 - 17
  • [26] Aging and computational systems biology
    Mooney, Kathleen M.
    Morgan, Amy E.
    Mc Auley, Mark T.
    WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-SYSTEMS BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2016, 8 (02) : 123 - 139
  • [27] Computational systems biology for toxicology
    Mendes, Pedro
    TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2014, 229 : S13 - S13
  • [28] Toward computational systems biology
    You, LC
    CELL BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOPHYSICS, 2004, 40 (02) : 167 - 184
  • [29] Computational systems biology of aging
    Kriete, Andres
    Lechner, Mark
    Clearfield, Drew
    Bohmann, Dirk
    WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-SYSTEMS BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2011, 3 (04) : 414 - 428
  • [30] Computational Models in Systems Biology
    Chen, Xue-wen
    2009 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GRANULAR COMPUTING ( GRC 2009), 2009, : 1 - 1