Assessing and mitigating vulnerability and fire risk in historic centres: A cost-benefit analysis

被引:27
|
作者
Tozo Neto, Julio [1 ]
Ferreira, Tiago Miguel [2 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Univ Fundacao Assis Gurgacz, Dept Civil Engn, Campus Cascavel, BR-85806095 Cascavel, Brazil
[2] Univ Minho, Inst Sci & Innovat Biosustainabil IB S, Dept Civil Engn, Campus Azurem, P-4800058 Guimaraes, Portugal
关键词
Fire risk; Built heritage; Fire Risk Index method; Cost-benefit analysis; CULTURAL-HERITAGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.culher.2020.04.003
中图分类号
K85 [文物考古];
学科分类号
0601 ;
摘要
Assessing and mitigating fire risk and vulnerability is of paramount importance, especially in historical centres, where the characteristics of the buildings and these areas themselves significantly contribute to the ignition and propagation of fire. Federal regulations require buildings to follow guidelines aimed at reducing fire risk, which may require undesirable changes to the architectural and historical characteristics of old constructions. In order to solve this conflict, some methodologies explicitly designed for the assessment of fire risk in ancient buildings, namely the ARICA and the FRI method, have been developed in recent years. A study recently conducted at the Historic Centre of Guimaraes, in Portugal, in which the condition of 269 buildings was assessed, revealed that a high percentage of these buildings present a moderate to high fire risk. Based on this previous study, the present work discusses the improvement in the fire safety of the Historic Centre of Guimaraes through the application of a series of risk mitigation strategies, which are analyzed resorting to a GIS tool. Analysis revealed that the application such intervention strategies, with an average cost of 28.48 euros per square metre, led to a reduction of the number of buildings considered to be of moderate to high fire risk from 67% to 1%, and to an increase of the percentage of buildings complying with regulations from 6% to 58%. (c) 2020 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:279 / 290
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Sustainability and cost-benefit analysis
    Pires, C
    ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING A, 1998, 30 (12) : 2181 - 2194
  • [42] THE RELATIONSHIP COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS
    不详
    PSYCHOLOGIST, 2011, 24 (09) : 643 - 643
  • [43] Environmental Cost-Benefit Analysis
    Atkinson, Giles
    Mourato, Susana
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCES, 2008, 33 : 317 - 344
  • [44] On justifying cost-benefit analysis
    Kornhauser, LA
    JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES, 2000, 29 (02): : 1037 - 1057
  • [45] Cost-benefit risk of renewable energy
    Hsu, K. -J.
    ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND INVESTMENT ASSESSMENT III, 2010, 131 : 85 - 94
  • [46] Assessing Self-Adaptation Strategies Using Cost-Benefit Analysis
    Gerostathopoulos, Ilias
    Raibulet, Claudia
    Alberts, Elvin
    2022 IEEE 19TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURE COMPANION (ICSA-C 2022), 2022, : 92 - 95
  • [47] A Proposed Methodology for Prioritizing Project Effects to Include in Cost-Benefit Analysis Using Resilience, Vulnerability and Risk Perception
    Torres Ortega, Saul
    Hanley, Nick
    Diaz Simal, Pedro
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2014, 6 (11) : 7945 - 7966
  • [48] Study on cost-benefit in fire protection and controlling technology
    Tian, YM
    PROGRESS IN SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, VOL V, PTS A AND B, 2005, 5 : 1752 - 1757
  • [49] The ALARP Principle in the Cost-Benefit Analysis for the Acceptability of Investment Risk
    Nestico, Antonio
    He, Shuquan
    De Mare, Gianluigi
    Benintendi, Renato
    Maselli, Gabriella
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (12)
  • [50] Cost-Benefit and Fiscal Impact Analysis of Ohio Historic Preservation Tax Credit (OHPTC)
    Guzman, Tatyana
    JOURNAL OF BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS, 2018, 9 (02): : 342 - 373