Rationale for the Evaluation of Renal Functional Reserve in Living Kidney Donors and Recipients: A Pilot Study

被引:16
|
作者
Spinelli, Alessandra [1 ,2 ]
Sharma, Aashish [1 ,5 ]
Villa, Gianluca [1 ,3 ]
Samoni, Sara [1 ,4 ]
Ramponi, Francesco [1 ]
Brocca, Alessandra [1 ]
Brendolan, Alessandra [1 ]
Chiaramonte, Stefano [1 ]
Castellano, Giuseppe [2 ]
Gesualdo, Loreto [2 ]
Ronco, Claudio [1 ]
机构
[1] San Bortolo Hosp, Int Renal Res Inst Vicenza, Dept Nephrol Dialysis & Transplantat, Vicenza, Italy
[2] Univ Bari, Dept Emergency & Organ Transplantat, Nephrol Dialysis & Transplantat Unit, Bari, Italy
[3] Univ Florence, Sect Anesthesiol & Intens Care, Dept Hlth Sci, Florence, Italy
[4] St Anna Sch Adv Studies, Inst Life Sci, Pisa, Italy
[5] Fortis Escorts Hosp, Dept Nephrol & Renal Transplant Med, Amritsar, Punjab, India
关键词
Acute renal injury; Kidney transplantation; Acute protein load; Renal functional reserve; GLOMERULAR-FILTRATION-RATE; SUBCLINICAL AKI; STRESS TEST; FOLLOW-UP; CAPACITY; RECOVERY; HEALTHY; NUMBER; TERM;
D O I
10.1159/000454931
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: In living kidney transplantation, preoperative donors' renal functional reserve (RFR) may correlate with postoperative residual renal function in both donors and recipients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the donors' RFR before transplantation and to compare basal and stress renal function before and after transplantation in both donors and recipients. Methods: Seven pairs of living kidney donors and recipients were considered for this observational study. RFR was measured with a renal stress test (RST) before and after the kidney transplantation through an oral protein loading test (1 g/kg of body weight). RFR was defined as the difference between the maximum value of creatinine clearance after protein load (stress glomerular filtration rate, sGFR) and baseline creatinine clearance (basal GFR, bGFR). Results: Before transplantation, a significant difference between sGFR and bGFR (p = 0.04) was observed in donors, with an RFR = 30.6 (11.9-41.5) mL/min/1.73 m(2). After kidney transplantation, sGFR was similar to bGFR for both donors and recipients (p = 0.13), with a limited RFR (7.9 [6.70-19.25] and 14.90 [-6.67 to 25.53] mL/min/1.73 m(2), respectively). The sum of the donor's and recipient's post-transplant sGFR was similar to the pre-transplant donor's sGFR (p = 0.73). Conclusion: RST is a safe, feasible, easy, and an inexpensive tool that is able to quantify RFR. In living kidney transplantation, it can be used in clinical practice to measure the original global filtration capacity of the donor's kidneys (sGFR) and to quantify the susceptibility of donors and recipients in developing postoperative kidney dysfunction. However, further studies with an adequate sample size and follow-up period are needed to test this hypothesis. (C) 2017 S. Karger AG, Basel
引用
收藏
页码:268 / 276
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Prediction of Renal Function in Living Kidney Donors and Recipients of Living Donor Kidneys Using Quantitative Histology
    Buus, Niels Henrik
    Nielsen, Cecilie Molgaard
    Skov, Karin
    Ibsen, Lotte
    Krag, Soren
    Nyengaard, Jens Randel
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2023, 107 (01) : 264 - 273
  • [42] Income of Living Kidney Donors and the Income Difference Between Living Kidney Donors and Their Recipients in the United States
    Gill, J. S.
    Gill, J.
    Barnieh, L.
    Dong, J.
    Rose, C.
    Johnston, O.
    Tonelli, M.
    Klarenbach, S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2012, 12 (11) : 3111 - 3118
  • [43] Health Literacy of Living Kidney Donors and Kidney Transplant Recipients
    Dageforde, Leigh Anne
    Petersen, Alec W.
    Feurer, Irene D.
    Cavanaugh, Kerri L.
    Harms, Kelly A.
    Ehrenfeld, Jesse M.
    Moore, Derek E.
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 98 (01) : 88 - 93
  • [44] Renal function of donors and recipients after living donor kidney transplantation in a Chinese cohort
    GONG NianqiaoMING ChangshengZENG FanjunZHANG WeijieLIN ZhenbinZHOU Ping CHEN Xiaoping and CHEN Zhishui Department of Surgery Tongji HospitalTongji Medical CollegeHuazhong University of Science and TechnologyWuhanHubei China
    中华医学杂志(英文版), 2011, (09) : 1290 - 1295
  • [45] Comparable renal function in living kidney donors and their recipients on tacrolimus-based immunosuppression
    van Duijnhoven, EM
    Dackus, HJA
    Christiaans, MHL
    van Hooff, JP
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 4 : 489 - 489
  • [46] Renal function of donors and recipients after living donor kidney transplantation in a Chinese cohort
    Gong Nian-qiao
    Ming Chang-sheng
    Zeng Fan-jun
    Zhang Wei-jie
    Lin Zhen-bin
    Zhou Ping
    Chen Xiao-ping
    Chen Zhi-shui
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 124 (09) : 1290 - 1295
  • [47] Beneficial effects on the renal function of both recipients and donors in living donor kidney transplantation
    Oh, C. K.
    Yoon, S. N.
    Lee, B. M.
    Kim, J. H.
    Kim, S. J.
    Kim, H.
    Shin, G. T.
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2008, 40 (07) : 2310 - 2312
  • [48] PERIODONTAL INFLAMMATION IN LIVING KIDNEY DONORS AND RENAL TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS RECEIVING EVEROLIMUS OR TACROLIMUS
    Pereira-Lopes, Otilia
    Sampaio-Maia, Benedita
    Sampaio, Susana
    Braga, Ana C.
    Felino, Antonio
    Pestana, Manuel
    TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 26 : 199 - 199
  • [49] A Study of Renal Outcomes in African American Living Kidney Donors
    Nogueira, Joseph M.
    Weir, Matthew R.
    Jacobs, Stephen
    Haririan, Abdolreza
    Breault, Denyse
    Klassen, David
    Evans, Deb
    Bartlett, Stephen T.
    Cooper, Matthew
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2009, 88 (12) : 1371 - 1376
  • [50] Long-Term Structural and Functional Myocardial Adaptations in Healthy Living Kidney Donors: A Pilot Study
    Bellavia, Diego
    Cataliotti, Alessandro
    Clemenza, Francesco
    Baravoglia, Cesar Hernandez
    Luca, Angelo
    Traina, Marcello
    Gridelli, Bruno
    Bertani, Tullio
    Burnett, John C.
    Scardulla, Cesare
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (11):