Ambivalent attitudes towards pre-implantation genetic diagnosis in Germany

被引:10
|
作者
Finck, Carolyn
Meister, Ulrike
Stoebel-Richter, Yve
Borkenhagen, Ada
Braehler, Elmar
机构
[1] Univ Leipzig, Univ Klinikum Leipzig AoR, Dept Med Psychol & Med Sociol, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany
[2] DRK Klin Berlin Westend, Frauen & Kinderklin, D-14050 Berlin, Germany
关键词
attitudes; ethical aspects; pre-implantation genetic diagnosis; religion;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.11.031
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: Pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) is a modern technique in reproductive medicine which can be used to diagnose genetic disorders of an embryo. PGD is currently not legal in Germany, still there are debates being held regarding the issue of legalization. Both the internationally "accepted" indications and new or alternative approaches can lead to complex ethical dilemmas. The attitudes towards PGD have rarely been assessed in the general population. Methods: In our study, 2110 persons aged 18-50 years were interviewed about their attitudes towards PGD and related topics. We assumed that religion, world views and the evaluation of PGD would influence the attitude a person has towards this procedure. Results and conclusions: In our survey, the majority of respondents would agree to a restricted legalization of PGD in Germany. Our results also confirmed some of our assumptions but religion did not have the expected influence. The evaluation of costs and benefits of PGD and the feelings associated with this technique explained more of the final attitude whether PGD should remain prohibited in Germany or not. The agreement to a restricted legalization may be connected to an overall rejection of prohibitions made by the state concerning the individual reproductive autonomy. (C) 2005 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:217 / 225
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Pre-implantation genetic screening and diagnosis: what doctors should know
    Maia, Sammya Bezerra
    Moura, Holanda
    Kane, Stefan Charles
    Costa, Fabricio da Silva
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE GINECOLOGIA E OBSTETRICIA, 2015, 37 (02): : 53 - 58
  • [42] Low utilization of pre-implantation genetic diagnosis in women with BRCA mutations
    Gerber, Deanna
    Khouri, Olivia R.
    Smith, Meghan
    Lee, Jessica
    Fehniger, Julia
    Grifo, James A.
    Pothuri, Bhavana
    Boyd, Leslie R.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 36 (15)
  • [43] Designer babies on tap? Medical students' attitudes to pre-implantation genetic screening
    Meisenberg, Gerhard
    PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2009, 18 (02) : 149 - 166
  • [44] Reproductive outcome following pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) in the UK
    Sharpe, Abigail
    Avery, Peter
    Choudhary, Meenakshi
    HUMAN FERTILITY, 2018, 21 (02) : 120 - 127
  • [45] Pregnancy after pre-implantation genetic diagnosis for Brachytacdyly type B
    Abu-Amero, Khaled
    Hellani, A.
    Azouri, J.
    Al-Sharif, H.
    El-Akoum, S.
    Abu-Amero, K.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 2008, 45 : S67 - S67
  • [46] German ethics group advises against pre-implantation genetic diagnosis
    Oreliana, C
    LANCET, 2002, 359 (9321): : 1926 - 1926
  • [47] Women's experience of pre-implantation genetic diagnosis: a qualitative study
    Karatas, J. C.
    Barlow-Stewart, K.
    Strong, K. A.
    Meiser, B.
    McMahon, C.
    Roberts, C.
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2010, 30 (08) : 771 - 777
  • [48] Effects of religious orientation and state secularism on pre-implantation genetic diagnosis
    Hichy, Zira
    Sciacca, Federica
    Di Marco, Graziella
    De Pasquale, Concetta
    HELIYON, 2020, 6 (08)
  • [49] Knowledge and attitudes towards preimplantation genetic diagnosis in Germany
    Meister, U
    Finck, C
    Stöbel-Richter, Y
    Schmutzer, G
    Brähler, E
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2005, 20 (01) : 231 - 238
  • [50] Cost-effectiveness of pre-implantation genetic diagnosis for BRCA mutation carriers
    Lipton, J. H.
    Wong, W. W. L.
    Warner, E.
    Greenblatt, E. M.
    Lee, E. K.
    Chan, K. K. W.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2017, 77