Higher Complications During the Waiting Period for Interval Cholecystectomy in Patients With Mild Biliary Pancreatitis

被引:0
|
作者
Tozlu, Mukaddes [1 ,4 ]
Karaca, Busra [2 ]
Acar, Sencan [1 ]
Toka, Bilal [3 ]
Karacaer, Cengiz [2 ]
Eminler, Ahmet Tarik [1 ]
Koeksal, Aydin S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Sakarya Univ, Fac Med, Dept Gastroenterol, Sakarya, Turkey
[2] Sakarya Univ, Fac Med, Dept Internal Med, Sakarya, Turkey
[3] Silivri Anadolu Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Istanbul, Turkey
[4] Sakarya Univ, Gastroenterol Clin, TR-54290 Adapazari, Sakarya, Turkey
关键词
acute biliary pancreatitis; gallstone; complications; cholecystectomy; GALLSTONE PANCREATITIS; LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY; DELAYED CHOLECYSTECTOMY; GUIDELINES; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1097/SLE.0000000000001094
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background:Although current guidelines recommend cholecystectomy during the same admission in patients with mild acute biliary pancreatitis (ABP), it involves a waiting list most of the time. We aimed to assess the risk of complications and determine predictors during the waiting period for cholecystectomy after the first episode of ABP. Methods:A prospective observational study was conducted in patients with mild ABP. Follow-ups were done by phone calls or using electronic health records for a maximum of 6 months after discharge or until cholecystectomy. Results:A total of 194 patients were included in the study. Although all patients were referred to surgeons, only 81 (41.8%) underwent cholecystectomy within 6 months after discharge. During the observation period, gallstone-related biliary events (GRBEs) developed in 68 (35.1%) patients, which included biliary colic, recurrent ABP, acute cholecystitis, choledocholithiasis, gallbladder perforation, cholangitis, and liver abscess. The overall readmission rate was 25.2%, with 44.8% occurred within 4 weeks after discharge. The odds ratio of any complication was 1.58 (95% CI, 1.42 to 1.76, P=0.028) and 1.59 (95% CI, 1.42 to 1.78, P=0.009) in the patients who did not have surgery within 2 to 7 days and 8 to 15 days, respectively. A 4-fold increased risk of readmission was detected (95% CI, 1.16 to 13.70, P=0.019) if cholecystectomy was not performed within 31 to 90 days. The patients who developed complications had significantly higher C-reactive protein at admission, longer waiting time, and had 3 or more gallstones on imaging. Conclusions:Interval cholecystectomy was associated with a high risk of complications during the waiting period in patients with mild ABP.
引用
收藏
页码:655 / 660
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Cholecystectomy and sphincterotomy in patients with mild acute biliary pancreatitis in Sweden 1988-2003: a nationwide register study
    Sandzen, Birger
    Haapamaki, Markku M.
    Nilsson, Erik
    Stenlund, Hans C.
    Oman, Mikael
    BMC GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2009, 9 : 80
  • [32] Early versus delayed cholecystectomy in patients with biliary acute pancreatitis
    Nebiker, Christian A.
    Frey, Daniel M.
    Hamel, Christian T.
    Oerdi, Daniel
    Kettelhack, Christoph
    SURGERY, 2009, 145 (03) : 260 - 264
  • [33] Evaluation of the early and delayed cholecystectomy in patients with acute biliary pancreatitis
    Beyazit, Unal
    Taskesen, Fatih
    Boyuk, Abdullah
    Arikanoglu, Zulfu
    Onder, Akin
    Kapan, Murat
    Aliosmanoglu, Ibrahim
    Keles, Celalettin
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2011, 27 (03) : 137 - 140
  • [34] Is There Disparity in Index-Admission Cholecystectomy for Mild Acute Biliary Pancreatitis in Patients With Morbid Obesity: A National Survey
    Ugbarugba, E. E.
    Charles, L.
    Porter, K.
    Pavurala, R.
    Hussan, H.
    Hart, P. A.
    Conwell, D. L.
    Krishna, S. G.
    PANCREAS, 2018, 47 (10) : 1429 - 1430
  • [35] Outcomes of early versus delayed cholecystectomy in patients with mild to moderate acute biliary pancreatitis: A randomized prospective study
    Jee, Shir Li
    Jarmin, Razman
    Lim, Kin Foong
    Raman, Krishnan
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 41 (01) : 47 - 54
  • [36] Laparoscopic cholecystectomy - Are patients with biliary pancreatitis at increased operative risk?
    Ammori, BJ
    Davides, D
    Vezakis, A
    Larvin, M
    McMahon, MJ
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2003, 17 (05): : 777 - 780
  • [37] EXPLORING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS AND IMPLICATIONS OF SAME ADMISSION CHOLECYSTECTOMY FOR MILD ACUTE BILIARY PANCREATITIS
    Farooq, Umer
    Tarar, Zahid
    Madi, Mahmoud Y.
    Jaan, Ali
    Arshad, Hafiz Muhammad Sharjeel
    Kiwan, Wissam
    Bazarbashi, Ahmad Najdat
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2024, 166 (05) : S462 - S463
  • [38] Digestive complications of biliary gallstone lost during laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    Habib, E
    Khoury, R
    Elhadad, A
    Jarno, F
    Diallo, T
    GASTROENTEROLOGIE CLINIQUE ET BIOLOGIQUE, 2002, 26 (10): : 930 - 934
  • [39] Does Waiting Pay? Comparing Complications and Cost Analysis of Emergency Versus Interval Cholecystectomy.
    Kang, J.
    Ruan, Q. Z.
    Hmida, R. B.
    Chaichanavichkij, P.
    May, H.
    Todd, J.
    Brearley, S.
    Taylor, F.
    Manook, M.
    Rohatgi, A.
    Chui, S.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 106 : 151 - 151
  • [40] IMPACT OF BILIARY SPHINCTEROTOMY IN PATIENTS WITH IDIOPATHIC ACUTE PANCREATITIS WITH PRIOR CHOLECYSTECTOMY
    Baroud, Serge
    Velaga, Saran Teja
    Majumder, Shounak
    Levy, Michael J.
    Gleeson, Ferga C.
    Pearson, Randall K.
    Vege, Santhi Swaroop
    Petersen, Bret T.
    Decker, Gustav A.
    Chandrasekhara, Vinay
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2022, 95 (06) : AB349 - AB349