Improving liver allocation: MELD and PELD

被引:184
|
作者
Freeman, RB [1 ]
Wiesner, RH
Roberts, JP
McDiarmid, S
Dykstra, DM
Merion, RM
机构
[1] Tufts Univ New England Med Ctr, Boston, MA 02111 USA
[2] Mayo Clin & Mayo Fdn, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[4] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Med Ctr, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[5] Univ Renal Res & Educ Assoc, Sci Registry Transplant Recipients, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[6] Univ Michigan, Sci Registry Transplant Recipients, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
allocation policy; expanded criteria; donor livers; liver transplantation; liver-intestine transplantation; MELD; pediatric liver transplantation; PELD; SRTR; waiting list;
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-6135.2004.00403.x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
On February 27, 2002, the liver allocation system changed from a status-based algorithm to one using a continuous MELD/PELD severity score to prioritize patients on the waiting list. Using data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, we examine and discuss several aspects of the new allocation, including the development and evolution of MELD and PELD, the relationship between the two scoring systems, and the resulting effect on access to transplantation and waiting list mortality. Additional considerations, such as regional differences in MELD/PELD at transplantation and the predictive effects of rapidly changing MELD/PELD, are also addressed. Death or removal from the waiting list for being too sick for a transplant has decreased in the MELD/PELD era for both children and adults. Children younger than 2 years, however, still have a considerably higher rate of death on the waiting list than adults. A limited definition of ECD livers suggests that they are used more frequently for patients with lower MELD scores.
引用
收藏
页码:114 / 131
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Critical analysis of the liver donors allocation policy in Sao Paulo, Brazil: To MELD or not to MELD.
    Sette, H
    Pessoa, MG
    Cury, RA
    Osawa, C
    Barros, MA
    HEPATOLOGY, 2001, 34 (04) : 650A - 650A
  • [42] Liver Allocation for Rare Disease: Does the MELD Score Suffice?
    Pullen, Lara C.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2020, 20 (12) : 3271 - 3272
  • [43] The impact of MELD allocation on simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation
    Thompson J.A.
    Lake J.R.
    Current Gastroenterology Reports, 2009, 11 (1) : 76 - 82
  • [44] Impact of the MELD allocation after its implementation in liver transplantation
    Benckert, Christoph
    Quante, Markus
    Thelen, Armin
    Bartels, Michael
    Laudi, Sven
    Berg, Thomas
    Kaisers, Udo
    Jonas, Sven
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2011, 46 (7-8) : 941 - 948
  • [45] Mathematical models and behavior: Assessing delta MELD for liver allocation
    Freeman, RB
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 4 (11) : 1735 - 1736
  • [46] MELD-based allocation scheme for liver transplantation in Israel
    Onaca, Nicholas
    Mor, Eytan
    ISRAEL MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2006, 8 (09): : 651 - 652
  • [47] Liver transplantation for hepatocellular cancer: The impact of the MELD allocation policy
    Wiesner, RH
    Freeman, RB
    Mulligan, DC
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2004, 127 (05) : S261 - S267
  • [48] GENDER DISCRIMINATION VIA MELD-BASED LIVER ALLOCATION
    Oellinger, R.
    Wiering, L.
    Ritschl, P. Viktor
    Jara, M.
    Biebl, M.
    Dziodzio, T.
    Aigner, F.
    Eurich, D.
    Oning, W. Sch
    Schmelzle, M.
    Pratschke, J.
    TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 32 : 13 - 13
  • [49] Effect of Change in National Liver Allocation on MELD-Exception Liver Transplant
    Subramanian, Vijay
    Chapman, William
    Dhanireddy, Kiran
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2021, 21 : 57 - 57
  • [50] Should Canada adopt the MELD score for allocation of liver transplants?
    Burak, KW
    Meeberg, G
    Myers, RP
    Hilsden, RJ
    Swain, MG
    Wong, WW
    Fick, GH
    Bain, VG
    Kneteman, NM
    HEPATOLOGY, 2005, 42 (04) : 322A - 322A