COSLE: Cost sensitive loan evaluation for P2P lending

被引:7
|
作者
Wu, Sen [1 ]
Gao, Xiaonan [1 ,2 ]
Zhou, Wenjun [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sci & Technol Beijing, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[2] Rutgers State Univ, Dept Management Sci & Informat Syst, Newark, NJ 07102 USA
[3] Univ Tennessee, Dept Business Analyt & Stat, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
P2P loan evaluation; Instance-aware misclassification cost; Differential labelling node cost calculation; Partition-based method; Cost-sensitive classification; CREDIT RISK-ASSESSMENT; DECISION TREE; MODELS; DEFAULT; ALGORITHMS; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ins.2021.11.055
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The loan evaluation is a fundamental task in peer-to-peer (P2P) lending. Effective loan eval-uation can help lenders make informed investment decisions. Existing methods do not con-sider the return of loans in the core learning stage and thus fail to explore the relationship between the return of loans and their final loan payoff outcomes. In this study, we propose a systematic loan evaluation framework called COst Sensitive Loan Evaluation (COSLE). Specifically, we first develop an instance-aware misclassification cost (IMCO) matrix, which specifies personalized cost for each loan. Then, we present a differential labelling algorithm called DILA cost for assigning node labels and assessing the corresponding cost. By integrating these enhancements into the tree-induction process, we construct a node splitting measurement called COG index. It exploits the relationship between the return information and the final payoff outcome. Additionally, we design the LER evaluation met-ric to measure the ability of a loan evaluation model to increase the lender's return. Finally, the COSLE is used to improve popular tree models. Extensive experiments based on the Lending Club dataset show that our COSLE can effectively increase the lender's return. (c) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:74 / 98
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A P2P Lending Agency Risk Evaluation Approach Based on RL
    Lv, Yue
    Li, Lei
    Wang, Tao
    Zhao, Tianyuan
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2018 5TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CLOUD COMPUTING AND INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS (CCIS), 2018, : 757 - 761
  • [22] Study on Performance Evaluation of P2P Lending Business Model Innovation
    Zhu, Yudan
    You, Liqun
    INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON HUMANISTIC MANAGEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT OF NEW CITIES AND TOWNS (ISHMD 2014), 2014, : 254 - 260
  • [23] Value Evaluation on Data Assets of P2P Net Loan Platform
    Li Yonghong
    Qin Kexin
    2018 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER INFORMATION SCIENCE AND APPLICATION TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 1168
  • [24] Does information seeking moderate the relationship between financial loan inclusion and Fintech P2P lending?
    Brahmana, Rayenda Khresna
    Kontesa, Maria
    Yau, Josephine Tan-Hwang
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL SERVICES MARKETING, 2024, 29 (01) : 171 - 185
  • [25] Does information seeking moderate the relationship between financial loan inclusion and Fintech P2P lending?
    Rayenda Khresna Brahmana
    Maria Kontesa
    Josephine Tan-Hwang Yau
    Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 2024, 29 : 171 - 185
  • [26] Herding behaviour in P2P lending markets
    Caglayan, Mustafa
    Talavera, Oleksandr
    Zhang, Wei
    JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL FINANCE, 2021, 63 : 27 - 41
  • [27] The Research of Recommendation Algorithms in P2P Lending
    Zhang, Yanmei
    Wang, Xiangyu
    Qian, Ya
    Jia, Hengyue
    MECHANICAL, CONTROL, ELECTRIC, MECHATRONICS, INFORMATION AND COMPUTER, 2016, : 241 - 247
  • [28] Bounded rationality in a P2P lending market
    Kim, Dongwoo
    REVIEW OF BEHAVIORAL FINANCE, 2021, 13 (02) : 184 - 201
  • [29] Are investors rational or perceptual in P2P lending?
    Chen, Xiao-hong
    Jin, Fu-jing
    Zhang, Qun
    Yang, Li
    INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND E-BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, 2016, 14 (04) : 921 - 944
  • [30] Message framing in P2P lending relationships
    Huang, Jin
    Sena, Vania
    Li, Jun
    Ozdemir, Sena
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2021, 122 : 761 - 773