Quality of prenatal care questionnaire: instrument development and testing

被引:52
|
作者
Heaman, Maureen I. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Sword, Wendy A. [4 ,5 ]
Akhtar-Danesh, Noori [4 ,5 ]
Bradford, Amanda [6 ]
Tough, Suzanne [7 ,8 ]
Janssen, Patricia A. [9 ]
Young, David C. [10 ]
Kingston, Dawn A. [11 ]
Hutton, Eileen K. [12 ,13 ]
Helewa, Michael E. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manitoba, Coll Nursing, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada
[2] Univ Manitoba, Coll Med, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Community Hlth Sci, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada
[3] Univ Manitoba, Coll Med, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada
[4] McMaster Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Sch Nursing, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada
[5] McMaster Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada
[6] McMaster Univ, Gilbrea Ctr Studies Aging, Hamilton, ON L8S 4M4, Canada
[7] Univ Calgary, Fac Med, Dept Paediat, Calgary, AB T3B 6A8, Canada
[8] Univ Calgary, Fac Med, Dept Community Hlth Sci, Calgary, AB T3B 6A8, Canada
[9] Univ British Columbia, Sch Populat & Publ Hlth, Vancouver, BC V6N 1Z3, Canada
[10] Dalhousie Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, IWK Hlth Ctr, Halifax, NS B3K 6R8, Canada
[11] Univ Alberta, Fac Nursing, Edmonton, AB T6G 1C9, Canada
[12] McMaster Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K, Canada
[13] McMaster Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Prenatal care; Quality of care; Measurement; Instrument; Reliability; Validity; Psychometric testing; LOW-BIRTH-WEIGHT; WOMENS SATISFACTION; ANTENATAL CARE; LOW-INCOME; PERSPECTIVES; PROVIDERS; PREGNANCY; SERVICES; RISKS; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2393-14-188
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: Utilization indices exist to measure quantity of prenatal care, but currently there is no published instrument to assess quality of prenatal care. The purpose of this study was to develop and test a new instrument, the Quality of Prenatal Care Questionnaire (QPCQ). Methods: Data for this instrument development study were collected in five Canadian cities. Items for the QPCQ were generated through interviews with 40 pregnant women and 40 health care providers and a review of prenatal care guidelines, followed by assessment of content validity and rating of importance of items. The preliminary 100-item QPCQ was administered to 422 postpartum women to conduct item reduction using exploratory factor analysis. The final 46-item version of the QPCQ was then administered to another 422 postpartum women to establish its construct validity, and internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Results: Exploratory factor analysis reduced the QPCQ to 46 items, factored into 6 subscales, which subsequently were validated by confirmatory factor analysis. Construct validity was also demonstrated using a hypothesis testing approach; there was a significant positive association between women's ratings of the quality of prenatal care and their satisfaction with care (r = 0.81). Convergent validity was demonstrated by a significant positive correlation (r = 0.63) between the "Support and Respect" subscale of the QPCQ and the "Respectfulness/Emotional Support" subscale of the Prenatal Interpersonal Processes of Care instrument. The overall QPCQ had acceptable internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.96), as did each of the subscales. The test-retest reliability result (Intra-class correlation coefficient = 0.88) indicated stability of the instrument on repeat administration approximately one week later. Temporal stability testing confirmed that women's ratings of their quality of prenatal care did not change as a result of giving birth or between the early postpartum period and 4 to 6 weeks postpartum. Conclusion: The QPCQ is a valid and reliable instrument that will be useful in future research as an outcome measure to compare quality of care across geographic regions, populations, and service delivery models, and to assess the relationship between quality of care and maternal and infant health outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Development of a measure of nursing home quality of care:: The Observable Indicators of Nursing Home Care Quality Instrument
    Rantz, MJ
    Zwygart-Stauffacher, M
    Mehr, D
    GERONTOLOGIST, 2001, 41 : 77 - 77
  • [42] The development and pilot testing of the Diabetes Activities Questionnaire (TDAQ): An instrument to measure adherence to the diabetes regimen
    Hernandez, CA
    APPLIED NURSING RESEARCH, 1997, 10 (04) : 202 - 211
  • [43] THE DEVELOPMENT AND TESTING OF A PROCESS-OUTCOME EVALUATION INSTRUMENT TO MEASURE QUALITY OF CARE IN NURSING-HOMES AS PERCEIVED BY RESIDENTS
    MEDITZ, J
    BOLTON, N
    GERONTOLOGIST, 1980, 20 (05): : 159 - 159
  • [44] A patient-centred instrument for assessment of quality of breast cancer care: results of a pilot questionnaire
    de Kok, M.
    Sixma, H. J. M.
    van der Weijden, T.
    Kessels, A. G. H.
    Dirksen, C. D.
    Spijkers, K. F. J.
    van de Velde, C. J. H.
    Roukema, J. A.
    van der Ent, F. W. C.
    Finaly-Marais, C.
    von Meyenfeldt, M. F.
    QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2010, 19 (06): : e40
  • [45] Development and testing of the GISMOS Instrument
    Garrison, James L.
    Walker, Michael
    Haase, Jennifer
    Lulich, Tyler
    Xie, Feiqin
    Ventre, Brian D.
    Boehme, Michael H.
    Wilmhoff, Ben
    Katzberg, Stephen J.
    IGARSS: 2007 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM, VOLS 1-12: SENSING AND UNDERSTANDING OUR PLANET, 2007, : 5105 - +
  • [46] Quantitative attitudes questionnaire: Instrument development and validation
    Chang, L
    EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1996, 56 (06) : 1037 - 1042
  • [47] DEVELOPMENT AND PRELIMINARY TESTING OF THE QUALITY OF SPIRITUAL CARE SCALE
    Daaleman, T. P.
    Reed, D. A.
    Cohen, L. W.
    Zimmerman, S.
    GERONTOLOGIST, 2013, 53 : 253 - 254
  • [48] Development and Preliminary Testing of the Quality of Spiritual Care Scale
    Daaleman, Timothy P.
    Reed, David
    Cohen, Lauren W.
    Zimmerman, Sheryl
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2014, 47 (04) : 793 - 800
  • [49] Development and testing of the rheumatoid arthritis quality of care survey
    Sloss, Sarah
    Dhiman, Kiran
    Zafar, Saania
    Hartfeld, Nicole M. S.
    Lacaille, Diane
    Then, Karen L.
    Li, Linda C.
    Barnabe, Cheryl
    Hazlewood, Glen S.
    Rankin, James A.
    Hall, Marc
    Marshall, Deborah A.
    English, Kelly
    Tsui, Karen
    MacMullan, Paul
    Homik, Joanne
    Mosher, Dianne
    Barber, Claire E. H.
    SEMINARS IN ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2022, 54
  • [50] Development of a Quality-of-Life Instrument for Autoimmune Bullous Disease The Autoimmune Bullous Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire
    Sebaratnam, Deshan F.
    Hanna, Anna Marie
    Chee, Shien-ning
    Frew, John W.
    Venugopal, Supriya S.
    Daniel, Benjamin S.
    Martin, Linda K.
    Rhodes, Lesley M.
    Tan, Jeremy Choon Kai
    Wang, Charles Qian
    Welsh, Belinda
    Nijsten, Tamar
    Murrell, Dedee F.
    JAMA DERMATOLOGY, 2013, 149 (10) : 1186 - 1191