Quality of prenatal care questionnaire: instrument development and testing

被引:52
|
作者
Heaman, Maureen I. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Sword, Wendy A. [4 ,5 ]
Akhtar-Danesh, Noori [4 ,5 ]
Bradford, Amanda [6 ]
Tough, Suzanne [7 ,8 ]
Janssen, Patricia A. [9 ]
Young, David C. [10 ]
Kingston, Dawn A. [11 ]
Hutton, Eileen K. [12 ,13 ]
Helewa, Michael E. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manitoba, Coll Nursing, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada
[2] Univ Manitoba, Coll Med, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Community Hlth Sci, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada
[3] Univ Manitoba, Coll Med, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada
[4] McMaster Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Sch Nursing, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada
[5] McMaster Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada
[6] McMaster Univ, Gilbrea Ctr Studies Aging, Hamilton, ON L8S 4M4, Canada
[7] Univ Calgary, Fac Med, Dept Paediat, Calgary, AB T3B 6A8, Canada
[8] Univ Calgary, Fac Med, Dept Community Hlth Sci, Calgary, AB T3B 6A8, Canada
[9] Univ British Columbia, Sch Populat & Publ Hlth, Vancouver, BC V6N 1Z3, Canada
[10] Dalhousie Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, IWK Hlth Ctr, Halifax, NS B3K 6R8, Canada
[11] Univ Alberta, Fac Nursing, Edmonton, AB T6G 1C9, Canada
[12] McMaster Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K, Canada
[13] McMaster Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Prenatal care; Quality of care; Measurement; Instrument; Reliability; Validity; Psychometric testing; LOW-BIRTH-WEIGHT; WOMENS SATISFACTION; ANTENATAL CARE; LOW-INCOME; PERSPECTIVES; PROVIDERS; PREGNANCY; SERVICES; RISKS; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2393-14-188
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: Utilization indices exist to measure quantity of prenatal care, but currently there is no published instrument to assess quality of prenatal care. The purpose of this study was to develop and test a new instrument, the Quality of Prenatal Care Questionnaire (QPCQ). Methods: Data for this instrument development study were collected in five Canadian cities. Items for the QPCQ were generated through interviews with 40 pregnant women and 40 health care providers and a review of prenatal care guidelines, followed by assessment of content validity and rating of importance of items. The preliminary 100-item QPCQ was administered to 422 postpartum women to conduct item reduction using exploratory factor analysis. The final 46-item version of the QPCQ was then administered to another 422 postpartum women to establish its construct validity, and internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Results: Exploratory factor analysis reduced the QPCQ to 46 items, factored into 6 subscales, which subsequently were validated by confirmatory factor analysis. Construct validity was also demonstrated using a hypothesis testing approach; there was a significant positive association between women's ratings of the quality of prenatal care and their satisfaction with care (r = 0.81). Convergent validity was demonstrated by a significant positive correlation (r = 0.63) between the "Support and Respect" subscale of the QPCQ and the "Respectfulness/Emotional Support" subscale of the Prenatal Interpersonal Processes of Care instrument. The overall QPCQ had acceptable internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.96), as did each of the subscales. The test-retest reliability result (Intra-class correlation coefficient = 0.88) indicated stability of the instrument on repeat administration approximately one week later. Temporal stability testing confirmed that women's ratings of their quality of prenatal care did not change as a result of giving birth or between the early postpartum period and 4 to 6 weeks postpartum. Conclusion: The QPCQ is a valid and reliable instrument that will be useful in future research as an outcome measure to compare quality of care across geographic regions, populations, and service delivery models, and to assess the relationship between quality of care and maternal and infant health outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Quality of prenatal care questionnaire: instrument development and testing
    Maureen I Heaman
    Wendy A Sword
    Noori Akhtar-Danesh
    Amanda Bradford
    Suzanne Tough
    Patricia A Janssen
    David C Young
    Dawn A Kingston
    Eileen K Hutton
    Michael E Helewa
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 14
  • [2] Quality of prenatal care questionnaire: psychometric testing in an Australia population
    Wendy Sword
    Maureen Heaman
    Mary Anne Biro
    Caroline Homer
    Jane Yelland
    Noori Akhtar-Danesh
    Amanda Bradford-Janke
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 15
  • [3] Psychometric Testing of the French Language Quality of Prenatal Care Questionnaire
    Sword, Wendy
    Heaman, Maureen
    Peterson, Wendy E.
    Salvador, Ann
    Akhtar-Danesh, Noori
    Bradford-Janke, Amanda
    JOURNAL OF NURSING MEASUREMENT, 2015, 23 (03) : 436 - 451
  • [4] Quality of prenatal care questionnaire: psychometric testing in an Australia population
    Sword, Wendy
    Heaman, Maureen
    Biro, Mary Anne
    Homer, Caroline
    Yelland, Jane
    Akhtar-Danesh, Noori
    Bradford-Janke, Amanda
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2015, 15
  • [5] Development and testing of the patient expectations and satisfaction with prenatal care instrument
    Omar, MA
    Schiffman, RF
    Bingham, CR
    RESEARCH IN NURSING & HEALTH, 2001, 24 (03) : 218 - 229
  • [6] Testing of the French Language and Australian Versions of the Quality of Prenatal Care Questionnaire (QPCQ)
    Sword, W.
    Heaman, M.
    Akhtar-Danesh, N.
    Bradford-Janke, A.
    Peterson, W.
    Biro, M. A.
    Homer, C.
    Yelland, J.
    Salvador, A.
    REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2014, 21 (03) : 321A - 321A
  • [7] Relatives' perspective on the quality of geriatric care and rehabilitation - development and testing of a questionnaire
    Wressle, Ewa
    Eriksson, Lennart
    Fahlander, Amie
    Hakansson, Helena
    Jonsson, Anna-Lena
    Martinsson, Britt-Marie
    Rasmusson, Ing-Marie
    Sjolander, Ingrid
    Tangmark, Karin
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF CARING SCIENCES, 2008, 22 (04) : 590 - 595
  • [8] Primary Care Outcomes Questionnaire: psychometric testing of a new instrument
    Murphy, M.
    Hollinghurst, S.
    Cowlishaw, S.
    Salisbury, C.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2018, 68 (671): : E433 - E440
  • [9] Patient perspective on quality of geriatric care and rehabilitation -: development and psychometric testing of a questionnaire
    Wressle, Ewa
    Eriksson, Lennart
    Fahlander, Amie
    Rasmusson, Ing-Marie
    Tedemalm, Ulla
    Tangmark, Karin
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF CARING SCIENCES, 2006, 20 (02) : 135 - 142
  • [10] Patient-Reported Quality of Care for Osteoarthritis: Development and Testing of the OsteoArthritis Quality Indicator Questionnaire
    Osteras, Nina
    Garratt, Andrew
    Grotle, Margreth
    Natvig, Bard
    Kjeken, Ingvild
    Kvien, Tore K.
    Hagen, Kare B.
    ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 2013, 65 (07) : 1043 - 1051