High-stakes testing and implications for students with visual impairments and other disabilities

被引:0
|
作者
Zebehazy, Kim
Hartmann, Elizabeth
Durando, Julie
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[2] San Francisco State Univ, Univ Calif Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[3] Univ No Colorado, Greeley, CO 80634 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
引用
收藏
页码:598 / 601
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Chinese students' experiences of 'high-stakes' assessment: the role of fitness testing
    Yang, Jing
    Bartle, Gillian
    Kirk, David
    Landi, Dillon
    PHYSICAL EDUCATION AND SPORT PEDAGOGY, 2025,
  • [22] High-Stakes Collaborative Testing: Why Not?
    Levine, Ruth E.
    Borges, Nicole J.
    Roman, Brenda J. B.
    Carchedi, Lisa R.
    Townsend, Mark H.
    Cluver, Jeffrey S.
    Frank, Julia
    Morey, Oma
    Haidet, Paul
    Thompson, Britta M.
    TEACHING AND LEARNING IN MEDICINE, 2018, 30 (02) : 133 - 140
  • [23] High-Stakes Testing !? Help Is on the Way
    Shultz, Cathleen M.
    NURSING EDUCATION PERSPECTIVES, 2010, 31 (04) : 205 - 205
  • [24] High-Stakes Testing Narrows the Curriculum
    David, Jane L.
    EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP, 2011, 68 (06) : 78 - 80
  • [25] High-stakes testing and dropout rates
    Shribeg, David
    Burke Shriberg, Amy
    DISSENT, 2006, 53 (04) : 76 - 80
  • [26] This issue - The impact of high-stakes testing
    Clarke, M
    Gregory, K
    THEORY INTO PRACTICE, 2003, 42 (01) : 2 - 3
  • [27] Native Americans and high-stakes testing
    Clark, JE
    PHI DELTA KAPPAN, 2002, 83 (09) : 724 - 724
  • [28] Agora: The impact of high-stakes testing
    Middleton, R
    Thomas, A
    Ruiz, R
    McGuire, K
    Bellamy, GT
    Ohanian, S
    Bornfield, G
    O'Connell, PJ
    JOURNAL OF TEACHER EDUCATION, 2000, 51 (04) : 289 - 292
  • [29] Assistencialism and the politics of high-stakes testing
    Urrieta Jr. L.
    The Urban Review, 2004, 36 (3) : 211 - 226
  • [30] The unintended consequences of high-stakes testing
    Basl, Josef
    SOCIOLOGICKY CASOPIS-CZECH SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2006, 42 (05): : 1090 - 1093