Revealing an Invasion Risk of Fish Species in Qingdao Underwater World by Environmental DNA Metabarcoding

被引:7
|
作者
Chen Jianwei [1 ]
Chen Zhi [2 ]
Liu Shanshan [1 ,3 ]
Guo Wenjie [1 ]
Li Di [4 ]
Toshifumi, Minamoto [5 ]
Gao Tianxiang [6 ]
机构
[1] BGI Shenzhen, BGI Qingdao, Qingdao 266555, Peoples R China
[2] Hainan Trop Ocean Univ, Coll Fisheries & Life Sci, Sanya 572022, Peoples R China
[3] BGI Shenzhen, China Natl GeneBank, Shenzhen 518120, Peoples R China
[4] Qingdao Underwater World, Qingdao 266003, Peoples R China
[5] Kobe Univ, Grad Sch Human Dev & Environm, Kobe, Hyogo 6578501, Japan
[6] Zhejiang Ocean Univ, Fisheries Coll, Zhoushan 316022, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 国家重点研发计划;
关键词
eDNA metabarcoding; fish diversity; non-indigenous; sampling effort; aquarium; FRESH-WATER FISHES; OREOCHROMIS-NILOTICUS; NILE TILAPIA; EDNA; SURVEILLANCE; CHALLENGES; RICHNESS; TRADE; TOOL;
D O I
10.1007/s11802-021-4448-2
中图分类号
P7 [海洋学];
学科分类号
0707 ;
摘要
Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding has emerged as a potentially powerful tool to monitor invasive fish species. As an alternative (or complementary) tool for biodiversity monitoring, eDNA metabarcoding had been used to detect species in aquariums, which represents an important transit avenue for introducing non-indigenous species with high population densities. In this study, eDNA metabarcoding as well as morphological characterization were used to reveal the diversity of non-indigenous species in a large aquarium at Qingdao Underwater World. Environmental DNA metabarcoding of 14 water samples at five locations from the Big Water Tank detected 24 non-indigenous species and four putative non-indigenous operational taxonomic units (OTUs). In contrast, only 20 non-indigenous species were observed by morphological characterization. Some species undetected by morphological characterization, such as Oreochromis niloticus (Linnaeus, 1758), are highly adaptable to various environments and/or have invaded preferred regions where they threaten native aquatic species. eDNA metabarcoding also detected seven local fishes that were not identified by morphological characterization. However, analysis of OTU diversity among stations and sample replications revealed that eDNA varied within and/or between stations. Increasing sampling effort as well as negative controls are required to increase the detection rate of species and to eliminate false-positive OTUs.
引用
收藏
页码:124 / 136
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Fish diversity assessment in the headwaters of the Volga River using environmental DNA metabarcoding
    Lecaudey, Laurene A.
    Schletterer, Martin
    Kuzovlev, Vyacheslav V.
    Hahn, Christoph
    Weiss, Steven J.
    AQUATIC CONSERVATION-MARINE AND FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS, 2019, 29 (10) : 1785 - 1800
  • [32] Environmental DNA metabarcoding primers for freshwater fish detection and quantification: In silico and in tanks
    Shu, Lu
    Ludwig, Arne
    Peng, Zuogang
    ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2021, 11 (12): : 8281 - 8294
  • [33] Environmental DNA Metabarcoding: A Novel Method for Biodiversity Monitoring of Marine Fish Communities
    Miya, Masaki
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF MARINE SCIENCE, 2022, 14 : 161 - 185
  • [34] Effects of sampling seasons and locations on fish environmental DNA metabarcoding in dam reservoirs
    Hayami, Kana
    Sakata, Masayuki K.
    Inagawa, Takashi
    Okitsu, Jiro
    Katano, Izumi
    Doi, Hideyuki
    Nakai, Katsuki
    Ichiyanagi, Hidetaka
    Gotoh, Ryo O.
    Miya, Masaki
    Sato, Hirotoshi
    Yamanaka, Hiroki
    Minamoto, Toshifumi
    ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2020, 10 (12): : 5354 - 5367
  • [35] Usefulness and limitations of sample pooling for environmental DNA metabarcoding of freshwater fish communities
    Hirotoshi Sato
    Yuki Sogo
    Hideyuki Doi
    Hiroki Yamanaka
    Scientific Reports, 7
  • [36] Evaluation of Fish Biodiversity in Estuaries Through Environmental DNA Metabarcoding: A Comprehensive Review
    Alenzi, Asma Massad
    FISHES, 2024, 9 (11)
  • [37] Environmental DNA metabarcoding uncovers environmental correlates of fish communities in spatially heterogeneous freshwater habitats
    Blabolil, Petr
    Harper, Lynsey R.
    Ricanova, Stepanka
    Sellers, Graham
    Di Muri, Cristina
    Juza, Tomas
    Vasek, Mojmir
    Sajdlova, Zuzana
    Rychtecky, Pavel
    Znachor, Petr
    Hejzlar, Josef
    Peterka, Jiri
    Hanfling, Bernd
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2021, 126
  • [38] Assessment of fish biodiversity in four Korean rivers using environmental DNA metabarcoding
    Alam, Md Jobaidul
    Kim, Nack-Keun
    Andriyono, Sapto
    Choi, Hee-kyu
    Lee, Ji-Hyun
    Kim, Hyun-Woo
    PEERJ, 2020, 8
  • [39] Usefulness and limitations of sample pooling for environmental DNA metabarcoding of freshwater fish communities
    Sato, Hirotoshi
    Sogo, Yuki
    Doi, Hideyuki
    Yamanaka, Hiroki
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2017, 7
  • [40] Environmental DNA metabarcoding: Current applications and future prospects for freshwater fish monitoring
    Liu, Shuaishuai
    Chen, Juan
    Cui, Ge
    Zhang, Bo
    Yan, Bingcheng
    Nie, Qihao
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2025, 376