Towards a generic multi-criteria evaluation model for low carbon cities

被引:54
|
作者
Azizalrahman, Hossny [1 ]
Hasyimi, Valid [1 ]
机构
[1] King Abdulaziz Univ, Dept Urban & Reg Planning, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
关键词
Low carbon city; Scoring; Multi-criteria evaluation; Carbon emissions; Climate change; EMISSIONS; WEIGHTS; SYSTEM; CHINA; LEAD;
D O I
10.1016/j.scs.2018.02.026
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The low carbon city concept has surfaced over the past decade and has been increasingly integrated with urban planning. Likewise, assessment methods of Low Carbon Cities have been initiated. Of these, are the Entropy weight method, fuzzy comprehensive evaluation and multi-criteria evaluation. This paper attempts to propose a multi-criteria evaluation model for city performance using a set of criteria and a benchmark with a view to determining whether the city is low carbon or not. Ten pilot cities were selected for which twenty indicators were utilized for model calibration and testing. First, a standard entropy model was employed featuring three cities as low carbon namely; Stockholm, Vienna and Sydney. Second, with the modification of entropy model by adding relative weight to indicators, two more cities were quite rightly added to the list: London and Sao Paulo. Third, the proposed model was calibrated and tested, the result of which was compared with the results of both entropy and modified entropy models. Luckily, the proposed model showed great similarity to the modified entropy model. Moreover, the model was subsequently tested independently on five additional cities comprising Copenhagen, Bogota, New Delhi, Singapore and Seoul to ascertain results. Copenhagen and Bogota were low carbon cities, the others were not. When populated with relevant data, the proposed model can readily determine whether a particular city is low carbon or not thereby obviating the need for benchmarking and score adjustment every time a new city is added to the study list.
引用
收藏
页码:275 / 282
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Fusion Approach for Multi-criteria Evaluation
    Wang, Jia-Wen
    Chang, Jing-Wen
    ADVANCES IN INTELLIGENT INFORMATION AND DATABASE SYSTEMS, 2010, 283 : 349 - 358
  • [22] Multi-Criteria Analysis for Policy Evaluation
    Drechsler, Martin
    EUROPEAN IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2010, : 119 - 129
  • [23] Firefly and Grey Wolf search based multi-criteria routing and aggregation towards a generic framework for LEACH
    Devika G.
    Ramesh D.
    Karegowda A.G.
    International Journal of Information Technology, 2022, 14 (1) : 105 - 114
  • [24] Automatic modulation classification for multi-criteria generic channel equalization
    Farhati, Chouaib
    Fki, Souhaila
    Aissa-El-Bey, Abdeldjalil
    Abdelkefi, Fatma
    2023 IEEE 97TH VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE, VTC2023-SPRING, 2023,
  • [25] A building carbon emission prediction model by PSO-SVR method under multi-criteria evaluation
    Chu, Xiaolin
    Zhao, Ruijuan
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2021, 41 (06) : 7473 - 7484
  • [26] A multi-actor multi-criteria analysis of the performance of global cities
    Kourtit, Katima
    Macharis, Cathy
    Nijkamp, Peter
    APPLIED GEOGRAPHY, 2014, 49 : 24 - 36
  • [27] SMART CITY EFFICIENCY ASSESSMENT MODEL: MULTI-CRITERIA ANALYSIS OF 127 CROATIAN CITIES
    Babic, Ana
    Blecich, Andrea Arbula
    Samarzija, Nikolina Dukic
    EKONOMSKI VJESNIK, 2024, 37 (02):
  • [28] Evaluation of a combined spatial multi-criteria evaluation model and deterministic model for landslide susceptibility mapping
    Pradhan, A. M. S.
    Kim, Y. T.
    CATENA, 2016, 140 : 125 - 139
  • [29] A Multi-Criteria Evaluation Model for Developmental Effectiveness in Cultural and Creative Industries
    Hsueh, Sung-Lin
    Hsu, Keng-Hsiu
    Liu, Chiung-Ying
    2012 INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON INFORMATION AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING, 2012, 29 : 1755 - 1761
  • [30] Rejecting hydro-biogeochemical model structures by multi-criteria evaluation
    Houska, T.
    Kraft, R.
    Liebermann, R.
    Klatt, S.
    Kraus, D.
    Haas, E.
    Santabarbara, I.
    Kiese, R.
    Butterbach-Bahl, K.
    Mueller, C.
    Breuer, L.
    ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2017, 93 : 1 - 12