Endoscopic and laparoscopic treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction

被引:35
|
作者
Pardalidis, NP [1 ]
Papatsoris, AG
Kosmaoglou, EV
机构
[1] Hellen AF, Dept Urol, Athens, Greece
[2] VA Gen Hosp, Athens, Greece
来源
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY | 2002年 / 168卷 / 05期
关键词
ureteral obstruction; laparoscopy; constriction; pathologic;
D O I
10.1016/S0022-5347(05)64267-X
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Although open pyeloplasty remains the gold standard for treating ureteropelvic junction obstruction, endourology and laparoscopy have revolutionized the management of upper tract stenosis. We present our diagnostic and minimally invasive therapeutic algorithm for the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Materials and Methods: A total of 13 females and 9 males with a mean age of 34.2 years suffering from ureteropelvic junction obstruction were treated with percutaneous endopyelotomy or laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty and followed for 47 to 61 months (mean 53.8) and 47 to 62 months (mean 52.5), respectively. Diagnosis was based on findings of ultrasound, excretory urography, furosemide washout renogram and retrograde ureteropyelography. In cases of ureteral kinking color duplex sonography and spiral computerized tomography were performed. In 14 patients with intrinsic stenosis percutaneous endopyelotomy was performed, while the remaining 8 patients (5 with crossing vessels, 2 with an extremely distended pelvis and 1 with a 2.5 cm. stricture) were treated with a laparoscopic dismembered Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty. Results: In the endopyelotomy group (success rate 92.8%), mean operation time was 1.2 hours, estimated blood loss was 152 ml., unit doses of analgesics were 5.4 tablets, days of hospitalization were 4.2 and time to return to normal activities was 15.7 days. In the laparoscopic group (success rate of 100%) the aforementioned variables were 3.5 hours (p <0.05), 150 ml., 6.3 tablets, 5 and 17.8 days, respectively. Long-term followup excretory urography and/or diuretic renal scan demonstrated improvement in all patients. Conclusions: Percutaneous endopyelotomy should be the treatment of choice for intrinsic ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty, although technically challenging, provides excellent results for extrinsic or complicated ureteropelvic junction stenosis.
引用
收藏
页码:1937 / 1940
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Laparoscopic transperitoneal dismembered pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction
    Vijayanand, Dhakshinamoorthy
    Rix, David
    Soomro, Naeem
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2006, 20 (12) : 1050 - 1053
  • [42] LAPAROSCOPIC APPROACH TO URETEROPELVIC JUNCTION OBSTRUCTION IN A BIFID PELVIS
    Curcio, Lessandro
    Ahouagi, Antonio Claudio
    Renteria, Juan
    Araujo, Igor Rui
    Presto, Daniel
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2012, 26 : A518 - A518
  • [44] Minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction
    Renner, C
    Rassweiler, J
    UROLOGE A, 2002, 41 (02): : 150 - 158
  • [45] Ureteroscopic treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction - Comment
    Preminger, GM
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 160 (05): : 1646 - 1647
  • [46] URETEROPELVIC JUNCTION OBSTRUCTION - TREATMENT WITH PERCUTANEOUS ENDOPYELOTOMY
    BUSH, WH
    BRANNEN, GE
    LEWIS, GP
    RADIOLOGY, 1989, 171 (02) : 535 - 538
  • [47] Ureteroscopic treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction - Reply
    不详
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 160 (05): : 1647 - 1647
  • [48] Percutaneous endopyelotomy for the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction
    Castaneda, F
    HernandezGraulau, JM
    SEMINARS IN INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 1996, 13 (02) : 169 - 183
  • [49] A new algorithm for the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction
    Carol Lovegrove
    Nature Clinical Practice Urology, 2006, 3 (1): : 10 - 10
  • [50] Trends in the Treatment of Adults with Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction
    Jacobs, Bruce L.
    Kaufman, Samuel R.
    Morgenstern, Hal
    Hollenbeck, Brent K.
    Wolf, J. Stuart, Jr.
    Hollingsworth, John M.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2013, 27 (03) : 355 - 360