Opt-Out Education: School Choice as Racial Subordination

被引:0
|
作者
James, Osamudia R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Miami, Sch Law, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA
关键词
EQUAL-PROTECTION; PUBLIC-EDUCATION; BLACK-AMERICA; RACE; SEGREGATION; DIVERSITY; WOMEN; LAW;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Despite failure to improve academic outcomes or close the achievement gap, school-choice policies, advanced by education legislation and doctrine, have come to dominate public discourse on public education reform in the United States, with students of color disproportionately enrolling in voucher programs and charter schools. This Article moves past the typical market-based critiques of school choice to analyze the particularly racialized constraints on choice for marginalized students and their families in the public school system. The Article unpacks the blame-placing that occurs when the individualism and independence that school choice and choice rhetoric promote fail to improve academic outcomes, and the ways in which choice merely masks racial subordination and the abdication of democratic values in the school system. Students of color and their families may be opting out, but their decisions to do so neither improve public education nor reflect genuine choice. This Article ultimately argues that the values underlining school choice and choice rhetoric-like privacy, competition, independence, and liberty-are inherently incompatible with the public school system. The Article concludes by suggesting an alternate legal and rhetorical framework acknowledging the vulnerability of minority students, as well as the interdependence between white students and non-white students in the system, and it advances strict limitations on school choice, even, if necessary, in the form of compulsory universal public school education.
引用
收藏
页码:1083 / 1135
页数:53
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Time for Oncologists to Opt In for Routine Opt-Out HIV Testing?
    Chiao, Elizabeth Y.
    Dezube, Bruce J.
    Krown, Susan E.
    Wachsman, William
    Brock, Malcolm V.
    Giordano, Thomas P.
    Mitsuyasu, Ronald
    Pantanowitz, Liron
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2010, 304 (03): : 334 - 339
  • [42] Opt-out choice framing attenuates gender differences in the decision to compete in the laboratory and in the field
    He, Joyce C.
    Kang, Sonia K.
    Lacetera, Nicola
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2021, 118 (42)
  • [43] Religious education before the ECtHR: the opt-out clause does not suffice anymore
    Berkmann, Burkhard J.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS EDUCATION, 2022, 44 (04) : 432 - 443
  • [44] The reality of rights: From rhetoric to opt-out
    不详
    EUROPEAN LAW REVIEW, 2009, 34 (06) : 815 - 816
  • [45] Opt-out testing for HIV in Africa: a caution
    Csete, J
    Schleifer, R
    Cohen, J
    LANCET, 2004, 363 (9407): : 493 - 494
  • [46] No Opt-out Is Forever - Sweden Opts Back In
    Schneider, Horst
    ATW-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUCLEAR POWER, 2010, 55 (06): : 412 - +
  • [47] Consensus algorithms for Opt-in/Opt-out and proximity marketing context
    Chahal, Fatima
    Fouchal, Hacene
    Gaiti, Dominique
    2023 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTING, NETWORKING AND COMMUNICATIONS, ICNC, 2023, : 207 - 213
  • [48] Opt-out legislations: the mysterious viability of the false
    Matesanz, Rafael
    Dominguez-Gil, Beatriz
    KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 95 (06) : 1301 - 1303
  • [49] GOOGLE BOOK SEARCH AND OPT-OUT PROCEDURES
    Su, Joy
    JOURNAL OF THE COPYRIGHT SOCIETY OF THE USA, 2009, 56 (04): : 947 - 983
  • [50] THE ETHICS OF AN OPT-OUT DEFAULT IN TOBACCO TREATMENT
    Ashcroft, Richard E.
    ADDICTION, 2015, 110 (03) : 389 - 390