Masonry Spiral Stairs: A Comparison between Analytical and Numerical Approaches

被引:3
|
作者
Olivieri, Carlo [1 ]
Cennamo, Claudia [2 ]
Cusano, Concetta [2 ]
Cutolo, Arsenio [3 ]
Fortunato, Antonio [1 ]
Mascolo, Ida [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Salerno, Dept Civil Engn, Via Giovanni Paolo II 132, I-84084 Fisciano, Italy
[2] Univ Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Dept Architecture & Ind Design, Via San Lorenzo Abazia San Lorenzo, I-81031 Aversa, Italy
[3] Univ Naples Federico II, Dept Struct Engn, Via Claudio 21, I-80125 Naples, Italy
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2022年 / 12卷 / 09期
关键词
masonry; spiral stairs; No-Tension material; Linear Arch Static Analysis (LASA); Limit Analysis; Safe Theorem; ANSYS Parametric Design Language (APDL); Finite Element Method (FEM); EQUILIBRIUM SOLUTION; ELEMENT-ANALYSIS; STATIC ANALYSIS; STRESS; BEAMS; DOMES; SHAPE;
D O I
10.3390/app12094274
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
The present paper applies the Linear Arch Static Analysis (LASA), which models the masonry material as unilateral, i.e., No-Tension material in the sense of Heyman, and the Safe Theorem of the Limit Analysis to the study of masonry spiral stairs. A comparison is made with a refined FE analysis of the same problem, obtained by means of the ANSYS Parametric Design Language (APDL). The objective is to prove that LASA can be a valid alternative to other more complex numerical methods, such as FE, especially when the modeling parameters, such as the boundary conditions, cannot be exactly defined. The case study of a small spiral staircase placed in the tower of Nisida, a small island close to Naples, Italy is taken into consideration. The results show that the LASA analysis provides results that fall within two limit FE cases in terms of stress and overall thrust, providing at the same time a meaningful insight into the equilibrium state of the structure.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Seismic performances of AAC masonry: a review of experimental and numerical approaches
    Miccoli, Lorenzo
    MAUERWERK, 2018, 22 (05) : 314 - 328
  • [32] Numerical Modeling Approaches of FRCMs/SRG Confined Masonry Columns
    Ombres, Luciano
    Verre, Salvatore
    FRONTIERS IN BUILT ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 5
  • [33] A Moving Boundary Model for Isothermal Drying and Shrinkage of Chayote Discoid Samples: Comparison between the Fully Analytical and the Shortcut Numerical Approaches
    Adrover, Alessandra
    Brasiello, Antonio
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2019, 2019
  • [34] Comparison of numerical and analytical Jacobians
    Vanden, KJ
    Orkwis, PD
    AIAA JOURNAL, 1996, 34 (06) : 1125 - 1129
  • [35] FEL GAIN IN THE PULSED REGIME - A COMPARISON BETWEEN NUMERICAL AND ANALYTICAL RESULTS
    DATTOLI, G
    GIANNESSI, L
    HERMSEN, T
    RENIERI, A
    RICHETTA, M
    TORRE, A
    NUOVO CIMENTO DELLA SOCIETA ITALIANA DI FISICA D-CONDENSED MATTER ATOMIC MOLECULAR AND CHEMICAL PHYSICS FLUIDS PLASMAS BIOPHYSICS, 1990, 12 (01): : 21 - 34
  • [36] Comparison between Numerical and Analytical Analysis on the Dynamic Behavior of Circular Tunnels
    Lu, Qingrui
    Chen, Shijun
    Chang, Yi
    He, Chunfeng
    EARTH SCIENCES RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2018, 22 (02) : 119 - 128
  • [37] Morphological modelling of side channels: A comparison between an analytical and numerical approach
    Schielen, R. M. J.
    van Putten, D. R.
    van der Mark, C. F.
    RIVER FLOW 2012, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2012, : 783 - 789
  • [38] A comparison between analytical and numerical simulations of solutions of the coupled Boussinesq equations
    Mohapatra, S. C.
    Fonseca, R. B.
    Guedes Soares, C.
    MARITIME TECHNOLOGY AND ENGINEERING 3, VOLS 1-2, 2016, : 1175 - 1180
  • [39] NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF LANDMINE EXPLOSIONS: COMPARISON BETWEEN DIFFERENT MODELLING APPROACHES
    Fichera, Claudio
    Peroni, Lorenzo
    Scapin, Martina
    COMPUTATIONAL METHODS FOR COUPLED PROBLEMS IN SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING V, 2013, : 708 - 719
  • [40] Rail vehicle wheel wear prediction: a comparison between analytical and experimental approaches
    Asadi, Ali
    Brown, Mike
    VEHICLE SYSTEM DYNAMICS, 2008, 46 (06) : 543 - 551