Sensitivity analysis of greenhouse gas emissions at farm level: case study of grain and cash crops

被引:67
|
作者
Abbas, Adnan [1 ]
Waseem, Muhammad [2 ]
Ahmad, Riaz [3 ]
Khan, Khurshied Ahmed [4 ]
Zhao, Chengyi [1 ]
Zhu, Jianting [5 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci Technol, Land Sci Res Ctr, Nanjing 210044, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Engn & Technol, Ctr Excellence Water Resources, Lahore 54890, Pakistan
[3] Jiangsu Univ, Zhenjiang 212013, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[4] Ghazi Univ City Campus, Dera Ghazi Khan 32200, Pakistan
[5] Univ Wyoming, Dept Civil & Architectural Engn, Laramie, WY 13820 USA
关键词
GHGs emission; CO2; Energy use efficiency; Data envelopment analysis; Sensitivity analysis; Grain and cash crops; ENERGY-USE EFFICIENCY; COTTON PRODUCTION; CROPPING SYSTEMS; OPTIMIZATION APPROACH; ECONOMIC-ANALYSIS; CORN PRODUCTION; INPUTS; PROVINCE; PUNJAB; WHEAT;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-022-21560-9
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Sensitivity analysis is useful to downgrade/upgrade the number of inputs to limit greenhouse emissions and enhance crop yield. The primary data from the 300 rice (grain crop) and 300 cotton (cash crop) farmers were gathered in face-to-face interviews by applying a multistage random sampling technique using a well-structured pretested questionnaire. Energy use efficiency was estimated with data envelopment analysis (DEA) model, and a second-stage regression analysis was conducted by applying Cobb-Douglas production function to evaluate the influencing factors affecting. The results exhibit that chemical fertilizers, diesel fuel and water for irrigation are the major energy inputs that are accounted to be 15,721.55, 10,787.50 and 6411.08 MJ ha(-1) for rice production, while for cotton diesel fuel, chemical fertilizer and water for irrigation were calculated to be 13,860.94, 12,691.10 and 4456.34 MJ ha(-1), respectively. Total GHGs emissions were found to be 920.69 and 954.71 kg CO2eq ha(-1) from rice and cotton productions, respectively. Energy use efficiency (1.33 and 1.53), specific energy (11.03 and 7.69 MJ ha(-1)), energy productivity (0.09 and 0.13 kg MJ(-1)) and energy gained (14,497.85 and 20,047.56 MJ ha(-1)) for rice and cotton crop, respectively. Moreover, the results obtained through the second-stage regression analysis revealed that excessive application of fertilizer had a negative impact on the yield of rice and cotton, while farm machinery, diesel fuel and biocides had a positive effect. We hope that these findings could help in the management of the energy budget that we believe will reduce the high emissions of GHGs to address the growing environmental hazards.
引用
收藏
页码:82559 / 82573
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Abating Greenhouse Gas Emissions Through Cash-for-Clunker Programs
    Morrison, Geoffrey M.
    Allan, Alexander
    Carpenter, Rachel
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2010, (2191) : 111 - 118
  • [22] Energy cost and greenhouse gas emissions of a Chinese wind farm
    Yang, Q.
    Chen, G. Q.
    Zhao, Y. H.
    Chen, B.
    Li, Z.
    Zhang, B.
    Chen, Z. M.
    Chen, H.
    INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP FROM THE INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON ENVIRONMENTAL MODELING AND SOFTWARE (IEMSS2010), 2011, 5 : 25 - 28
  • [23] Winter feeding systems and farm greenhouse gas emissions.
    Alemu, A. W.
    Doce, R. R.
    Dick, A. C.
    Basarab, J.
    Krobel, R.
    Haugen-Kozyra, K.
    Baron, V.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2016, 94 : 577 - 578
  • [24] A whole farm systems analysis of greenhouse gas emissions of 60 Tasmanian dairy farms
    Christie, K. M.
    Rawnsley, R. P.
    Eckard, R. J.
    ANIMAL FEED SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 166-67 : 653 - 662
  • [25] Effect of winter feeding systems on farm greenhouse gas emissions
    Alemu, A. W.
    Doce, R. R.
    Dick, A. C.
    Basarab, J. A.
    Krobel, R.
    Haugen-Kozyra, K.
    Baron, V. S.
    AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2016, 148 : 28 - 37
  • [26] GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS CAUSED BY FARM MANURE MANAGEMENT IN LATVIA
    Berzina, Laima
    Priekulis, Juris
    Aboltins, Aivars
    Frolova, Olga
    18TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE ENGINEERING FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT, 2019, : 78 - 82
  • [27] A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ON-FARM GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FROM FAMILY FARMS IN LITHUANIA
    Dabkiene, Vida
    RESEARCH FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT 2017, VOL 2, 2017, : 225 - 232
  • [28] District-level analysis for household-related energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions: A case study in Lima, Peru
    Cardenas-Mamani, Ursula
    Kahhat, Ramzy
    Vazquez-Rowe, Ian
    SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2022, 77
  • [29] Greenhouse gas emissions, grain yield and water productivity: a paddy rice field case study based in Myanmar
    Win, Ei Phyu
    Win, Kyaw Kyaw
    Bellingrath-Kimura, Sonoko D.
    Oo, Aung Zaw
    GREENHOUSE GASES-SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 10 (05) : 884 - 897
  • [30] Greenhouse gas calculator at farm level addressed to the growers
    Carmen M. Torres
    Assumpció Antón
    Francesc Ferrer
    Francesc Castells
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2017, 22 : 537 - 545