Sensitivity analysis of greenhouse gas emissions at farm level: case study of grain and cash crops

被引:67
|
作者
Abbas, Adnan [1 ]
Waseem, Muhammad [2 ]
Ahmad, Riaz [3 ]
Khan, Khurshied Ahmed [4 ]
Zhao, Chengyi [1 ]
Zhu, Jianting [5 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci Technol, Land Sci Res Ctr, Nanjing 210044, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Engn & Technol, Ctr Excellence Water Resources, Lahore 54890, Pakistan
[3] Jiangsu Univ, Zhenjiang 212013, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[4] Ghazi Univ City Campus, Dera Ghazi Khan 32200, Pakistan
[5] Univ Wyoming, Dept Civil & Architectural Engn, Laramie, WY 13820 USA
关键词
GHGs emission; CO2; Energy use efficiency; Data envelopment analysis; Sensitivity analysis; Grain and cash crops; ENERGY-USE EFFICIENCY; COTTON PRODUCTION; CROPPING SYSTEMS; OPTIMIZATION APPROACH; ECONOMIC-ANALYSIS; CORN PRODUCTION; INPUTS; PROVINCE; PUNJAB; WHEAT;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-022-21560-9
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Sensitivity analysis is useful to downgrade/upgrade the number of inputs to limit greenhouse emissions and enhance crop yield. The primary data from the 300 rice (grain crop) and 300 cotton (cash crop) farmers were gathered in face-to-face interviews by applying a multistage random sampling technique using a well-structured pretested questionnaire. Energy use efficiency was estimated with data envelopment analysis (DEA) model, and a second-stage regression analysis was conducted by applying Cobb-Douglas production function to evaluate the influencing factors affecting. The results exhibit that chemical fertilizers, diesel fuel and water for irrigation are the major energy inputs that are accounted to be 15,721.55, 10,787.50 and 6411.08 MJ ha(-1) for rice production, while for cotton diesel fuel, chemical fertilizer and water for irrigation were calculated to be 13,860.94, 12,691.10 and 4456.34 MJ ha(-1), respectively. Total GHGs emissions were found to be 920.69 and 954.71 kg CO2eq ha(-1) from rice and cotton productions, respectively. Energy use efficiency (1.33 and 1.53), specific energy (11.03 and 7.69 MJ ha(-1)), energy productivity (0.09 and 0.13 kg MJ(-1)) and energy gained (14,497.85 and 20,047.56 MJ ha(-1)) for rice and cotton crop, respectively. Moreover, the results obtained through the second-stage regression analysis revealed that excessive application of fertilizer had a negative impact on the yield of rice and cotton, while farm machinery, diesel fuel and biocides had a positive effect. We hope that these findings could help in the management of the energy budget that we believe will reduce the high emissions of GHGs to address the growing environmental hazards.
引用
收藏
页码:82559 / 82573
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Sensitivity analysis of greenhouse gas emissions at farm level: case study of grain and cash crops
    Adnan Abbas
    Muhammad Waseem
    Riaz Ahmad
    Khurshied Ahmed khan
    Chengyi Zhao
    Jianting Zhu
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022, 29 : 82559 - 82573
  • [2] Sensitivity analysis for models of greenhouse gas emissions at farm level. Case study of N2O emissions simulated by the CERES-EGC model
    Drouet, J-L
    Capian, N.
    Fiorelli, J-L
    Blanfort, V.
    Capitaine, M.
    Duretz, S.
    Gabrielle, B.
    Martin, R.
    Lardy, R.
    Cellier, P.
    Soussana, J-F
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2011, 159 (11) : 3156 - 3161
  • [3] Energy analysis of the farm and assessment of greenhouse gas emissions
    Toma, Camelia
    HARNESSING TANGIBLE AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS IN THE CONTEXT OF EUROPEAN INTEGRATION AND GLOBALIZATION: CHALLENGES AHEAD, VOLS I-II, 2021, : 1049 - 1058
  • [4] Reducing greenhouse gas emissions through the use of urease inhibitors: A farm level analysis
    Tzemi, Domna
    Breen, James
    ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2019, 394 : 18 - 26
  • [5] Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Eco-Performance at Farm Level: A Parametric Approach
    Christian Stetter
    Johannes Sauer
    Environmental and Resource Economics, 2022, 81 : 617 - 647
  • [6] Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Eco-Performance at Farm Level: A Parametric Approach
    Stetter, Christian
    Sauer, Johannes
    ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2022, 81 (03): : 617 - 647
  • [7] Modelling uncertainty in greenhouse gas emissions from UK agriculture at the farm level
    Gibbons, JM
    Ramsden, SJ
    Blake, A
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2006, 112 (04) : 347 - 355
  • [8] On-farm greenhouse gas emissions associated with the cultivation of two new bioenergy crops in the UK
    Cumplido-Marin, Laura
    Graves, Anil R.
    Burgess, Paul J.
    Williams, Adrian
    ENERGY NEXUS, 2022, 8
  • [9] Whole-farm systems analysis of Australian dairy farm greenhouse gas emissions
    Christie, K. M.
    Gourley, C. J. P.
    Rawnsley, R. P.
    Eckard, R. J.
    Awty, I. M.
    ANIMAL PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2012, 52 (11) : 998 - 1011
  • [10] Adjusting eco-efficiency to greenhouse gas emissions targets at farm level ? The case of Swedish dairy farms
    Martinsson, Elin
    Hansson, Helena
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 287