Development of Risk Acceptance Criteria for Indian Railways

被引:1
|
作者
Malviya, Ashwin [1 ]
Singh, Vishal Kumar [1 ]
Yadav, Bikarama Prasad [2 ]
机构
[1] Vedanta Ltd, New Delhi, India
[2] Univ Petr & Energy Studies, Bidholi 248007, Dehradun, India
关键词
ALARP; Cumulative frequency F-N curve; Individual risk Risk acceptance criteria; Societal risk;
D O I
10.1007/978-981-10-7281-9_7
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Indian railways cater to the need of more than a billion people every year. Despite the undeniable fact that Indian railways form the backbone of Indian economy, its safety records are tainted. Over the past six months alone, three major railway accidents, resulting in the loss of 193 lives, have taken place. In order to improve this situation, it is required that proper quantitative risk assessment (QRA) is done for the railways. The prerequisite of doing a meaningful QRA is the availability of a well-defined Risk Acceptance Criteria (RAC). In this approach, the individual risk and societal risk are calculated with the help of statistical data of accidents eventuated from 1990 to 2016. After computation of individual risk and societal risk, the As Low As Reasonably Practicable (ALARP) zones are plotted. The ALARP zone gives a guideline of the region of risk acceptability. The ALARP zones have been calibrated by comparing criteria of various countries that can be used in Indian context. Risk acceptability region contributes in the formulation of RAC. With this risk-based approach of QRA, an RAC is developed for the Indian railways. Finally, the Indian Authorities may use formulated and uniform criteria from the RAC developed.
引用
收藏
页码:91 / 102
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] State of Indian railways
    Sriraman, S
    ECONOMIC AND POLITICAL WEEKLY, 1998, 33 (38) : 2428 - 2429
  • [32] Study on risk acceptance criteria for urban gas engineering
    Liu, Jun'e
    Jia, Zengke
    ISCRAM CHINA 2007: PROCEEDINGS OF THE SECOND INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON INFORMATION SYSTEMS FOR CRISIS RESPONSE AND MANAGEMENT, 2007, : 459 - 464
  • [33] Methodology for determining the risk acceptance criteria for the Seveso establishments
    Golob, Simona
    Kozuh, Mitja
    PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2016, 100 : 163 - 172
  • [34] Societal risk acceptance criteria for pressure pipelines in China
    Pei, Jingjing
    Wang, Guantao
    Luo, Sida
    Luo, Yun
    SAFETY SCIENCE, 2018, 109 : 20 - 26
  • [35] Loss-of-life modelling in risk acceptance criteria
    Lentz, A
    Rackwitz, R
    PROBABILISTIC SAFETY ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, VOL 1- 6, 2004, : 1924 - 1929
  • [36] Modeling of risk acceptance criteria for tunnel and underground engineering
    Hu, QF
    Huang, HW
    Geotechnical Engineering for Disaster Mitigation and Rehabilitation, 2005, : 543 - 550
  • [37] FINANCIAL CRITERIA FOR INVESTMENT IN RAILWAYS
    BEESLEY, ME
    OXFORD BULLETIN OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 1962, 24 (01) : 31 - 50
  • [38] SHOULD INDIAN RAILWAYS BE PRIVATIZED
    DALVI, MQ
    ECONOMIC AND POLITICAL WEEKLY, 1995, 30 (02) : 103 - 112
  • [39] Indian railways: Agenda for reform
    Mattoo, A
    ECONOMIC AND POLITICAL WEEKLY, 2000, 35 (10) : 771 - 778
  • [40] Organisational restructuring of Indian Railways
    Dutta, Mridul
    CASE STUDIES ON TRANSPORT POLICY, 2022, 10 (01) : 66 - 80