Why Is Bigger Not Always Better in Primary Health Care Practices? The Role of Mediating Organizational Factors

被引:12
|
作者
Pineault, Raynald [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Provost, Sylvie [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Da Silva, Roxane Borges [1 ,3 ,5 ]
Breton, Mylaine [6 ,7 ]
Levesque, Jean-Frederic [8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Hosp Univ Montreal, Ctr Rech, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[2] Inst Natl Sante Publ Quebec, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] Univ Montreal, Inst Rech Sante Publ, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[4] Ctr Est de Ile de Montreal, CIUSS, Direct Sante Publ, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[5] Univ Montreal, Fac Sci Infirm, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[6] Hop Charles Lemoyne, Ctr Rech, Longueuil, PQ, Canada
[7] Univ Sherbrooke, Dept Sci Sante Communautaire, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[8] Univ New S Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[9] Bur Hlth Informat, Sydney, NSW, Australia
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
organizational characteristics; size of PHC practice; experience of care; preventive care; unmet needs; primary care; QUALITY-OF-CARE; CENTERED MEDICAL HOME; PRACTICE SIZE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSICIAN PRACTICE; CHRONIC DISEASE; PERFORMANCE; INDICATORS; SYSTEMS; RECORDS;
D O I
10.1177/0046958015626842
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Size of primary health care (PHC) practices is often used as a proxy for various organizational characteristics related to provision of care. The objective of this article is to identify some of these organizational characteristics and to determine the extent to which they mediate the relationship between size of PHC practice and patients' experience of care, preventive services, and unmet needs. In 2010, we conducted population and organization surveys in 2 regions of the province of Quebec. We carried out multilevel linear and logistic regression analyses, adjusting for respondents' individual characteristics. Size of PHC practice was associated with organizational characteristics and resources, patients' experience of care, unmet needs, and preventive services. Overall, the larger the size of a practice, the higher the accessibility, but the lower the continuity. However, these associations faded away when organizational variables were introduced in the analysis model. This result supports the hypothesized mediating effect of organizational characteristics on relationships between practice size and patients' experience of care, preventive services, and unmet needs. Our results indicate that size does not add much information to organizational characteristics. Using size as a proxy for organizational characteristics can even be misleading because its relationships with different outcomes are highly variable.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Why bigger is not always better: on finite and infinite neural networks
    Aitchison, Laurence
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING, VOL 119, 2020, 119
  • [2] Are bigger flies always better: The role of genes and environment
    Amitabh Joshi
    Journal of Genetics, 2004, 83 : 13 - 15
  • [4] Penile silicone pseudocarcinomatous epithelial hyperplasia; why bigger is not always better
    Magrill, Dan
    Shabbir, Majid
    Belal, Mo
    Cahill, Declan
    Hughes, Ben
    Corbishley, Cathy
    Watkin, Nick
    Perry, Matthew
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL UROLOGY, 2008, 1 (03) : 139 - 141
  • [5] Is bigger better for primary care groups and trusts?
    Bojke, C
    Gravelle, H
    Wilkin, D
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 322 (7286): : 599 - 602B
  • [6] General Practice Bigger is better for primary care
    Hawkes, Nigel
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 342
  • [7] Better (care) is always more (health).
    Rubio, Vicente Ortun
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE SALUD PUBLICA, 2006, 80 (01): : 1 - 4
  • [8] The Role of Primary Care Practices in Advancing Population Health
    Goldberg, Debora Goetz
    Feng, Lisa Bo
    Kuzel, Anton
    JOURNAL OF AMBULATORY CARE MANAGEMENT, 2016, 39 (01): : 87 - 94
  • [9] Are attributes of organizational performance in large health care organizations relevant in primary care practices
    Orzano, AJ
    Tallia, AF
    Nutting, PA
    Scott-Cawiezell, J
    Crabtree, BF
    HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2006, 31 (01) : 2 - 10