Sustainability trade-offs in bioenergy development in the Philippines: An application of conjoint analysis

被引:11
|
作者
Acosta, Lilibeth A. [1 ,2 ]
Eugenio, Elena A. [2 ,3 ]
Enano, Nelson H., Jr. [4 ,5 ]
Magcale-Macandog, Damasa B. [3 ]
Vega, Belita A. [6 ]
Macandog, Paula Beatrice M. [3 ,7 ]
Eugenio, Jemimah Mae A. [8 ]
Lopez, Marilou A.
Salvacion, Arnold R. [9 ]
Lucht, Wolfgang [1 ]
机构
[1] Potsdam Inst Climate Impact Res PIK, D-14473 Potsdam, Germany
[2] UPLB, Sch Environm Sci & Management, Los Banos, Philippines
[3] UPLB, Coll Arts & Sci, Inst Biol Sci, Los Banos, Philippines
[4] Ateneo Davao Univ, Trop Inst Climate Studies, Dabaw, Philippines
[5] Ateneo de Davao Univ, Ctr Renewable Energy & Alternat Technol, Dabaw, Philippines
[6] VSU, Inst Strateg Res & Dev Studies, Baybay, Philippines
[7] UPLB, Coll Econ & Management, Los Banos, Philippines
[8] UPLB, Inst Math Sci & Phys, Los Banos, Philippines
[9] UPLB, Coll Publ Affairs & Dev, Inst Governance & Rural Dev, Los Banos, Philippines
来源
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY | 2014年 / 64卷
关键词
Bioenergy; Biofuels; Conjoint analysis; Philippines; Sustainability; Trade-off analysis; FOOD SECURITY; POLICY; PREFERENCES; BARRIERS; BIOFUELS; BIOMASS; PLANTATIONS; BIODIESEL; EUROPE; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.03.015
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
Sustainability assessments of bioenergy production are essential because it can have both positive and negative impacts on society. Human preferences that influence trade-off decisions on the relevant determinants and indicators of sustainability should be taken into account in these assessments. In this paper, we conducted a survey with five groups of respondents including government officials and employees, academic and research professionals, private company managers and workers, farm owners and workers, and others (e.g. students, residents, etc.) to assess their trade-off decisions on bioenergy development in the Philippines. The analyses of the survey results reveal that sustainability of bioenergy production will depend on the choice of biomass feedstock and these choices depend on people's perceptions. Heterogeneous perceptions among the different groups of respondents on the appropriate bioenergy feedstock to achieve economic, social and ecological sustainability suggest that sustainability of bioenergy is not a generic concept. The use of aggregate indices for sustainability assessments that ignore these perceptions on bioenergy production can thus be very misleading. The preference weights from conjoint analysis, which measure human preferences on different determinants and indicators of economic, social and ecological sustainability, can help improve sustainability assessments. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:20 / 41
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A sustainability framework for assessing trade-offs in ecosystem services
    Cavender-Bares, Jeannine
    Polasky, Stephen
    King, Elizabeth
    Balvanera, Patricia
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2015, 20 (01):
  • [22] Evaluating sustainability trade-offs along Supply Chain
    Brondi, Carlo
    Fragassi, Federico
    Pasetti, Tommaso
    Fornasiero, Rosanna
    2014 INTERNATIONAL ICE CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING, TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION (ICE), 2014,
  • [23] Global bioenergy scenarios - Future forest development, land-use implications, and trade-offs
    Kraxner, Florian
    Nordstrom, Eva-Maria
    Havlik, Petr
    Gusti, Mykola
    Mosnier, Aline
    Frank, Stefan
    Valin, Hugo
    Fritz, Steffen
    Fuss, Sabine
    Kindermann, Georg
    McCallum, Ian
    Khabarov, Nikolay
    Boettcher, Hannes
    See, Linda
    Aoki, Kentaro
    Schmid, Erwin
    Mathe, Laszlo
    Obersteiner, Michael
    BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2013, 57 : 86 - 96
  • [24] Trade-offs in forest utilization from a sustainability perspective
    Boman, Mattias
    Mattsson, Leif
    Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 2006, 21 (2-3) : 133 - 146
  • [25] Sustainability Trade-Offs in Organic Orchard Floor Management
    Granatstein, D.
    Wiman, M.
    Kirby, E.
    Mullinix, K.
    ORGANIC FRUIT CONFERENCE, 2010, 873 : 115 - 121
  • [26] Navigating sustainability trade-offs in global beef production
    Castonguay, Adam C.
    Polasky, Stephen
    H. Holden, Matthew
    Herrero, Mario
    Mason-D'Croz, Daniel
    Godde, Cecile
    Chang, Jinfeng
    Gerber, James
    Witt, G. Bradd
    Game, Edward T.
    A. Bryan, Brett
    Wintle, Brendan
    Lee, Katie
    Bal, Payal
    McDonald-Madden, Eve
    NATURE SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 6 (03) : 284 - +
  • [27] Sustainability Trade-Offs in Climate Change Geographies in England
    Sturzaker, John
    Catulli, Maurizio
    Kubitz, Beate
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (02)
  • [28] Classification of Trade-offs Encountered in the Practice of Corporate Sustainability
    Merriam Haffar
    Cory Searcy
    Journal of Business Ethics, 2017, 140 : 495 - 522
  • [29] Navigating sustainability trade-offs in global beef production
    Adam C. Castonguay
    Stephen Polasky
    Matthew H. Holden
    Mario Herrero
    Daniel Mason-D’Croz
    Cecile Godde
    Jinfeng Chang
    James Gerber
    G. Bradd Witt
    Edward T. Game
    Brett A. Bryan
    Brendan Wintle
    Katie Lee
    Payal Bal
    Eve McDonald-Madden
    Nature Sustainability, 2023, 6 : 284 - 294
  • [30] Evolutionary trade-offs in tumor development
    Hausser, J.
    Szekely, P.
    Bar, N.
    Tzimmer, A.
    Caldas, C.
    Alon, U.
    FEBS JOURNAL, 2017, 284 : 275 - 275