Ownership diversity and the risk-taking channel of monetary policy transmission

被引:3
|
作者
Caselli, Giorgio [1 ]
Figueira, Catarina [2 ]
Nellis, Joseph G. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Ctr Business Res, Cambridge Judge Business Sch, Cambridge CB2 1QA, England
[2] Cranfield Univ, Cranfield Sch Management, Econ Policy & Performance Grp, Cranfield, Beds, England
关键词
Ecology; Financial crisis; Monetary policy transmission; Ownership diversity; Risk-taking channel; CENTRAL BANK INDEPENDENCE; INTEREST-RATES; FINANCIAL CRISIS; STABILITY; BEHAVIOR; CREDIT; MONEY; FIRM; DIVERSIFICATION; PROFITABILITY;
D O I
10.1093/cje/beaa011
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper joins a rapidly growing body of literature that aims to uncover the link between monetary policy and bank risk taking. We investigate the hypothesis that the ownership composition of the banking system moderates monetary policy transmission via the risk-taking channel. Borrowing measures used in ecology to quantify diversity of species within an ecosystem and first applied to the field of finance by Michie, J. and Oughton, C. 2013. 'Measuring Diversity in Financial Services Markets: A Diversity Index', Centre for Financial and Management Studies Discussion Papers no. 113, this paper shows that the impact of exogenous monetary policy shocks on banks' probability of default is reduced in countries with greater ownership diversity. We also find that-ceteris paribus-shareholder- and stakeholder-oriented banks located in more ownership-diverse systems tend to have a lower appetite for risk than their counterparts operating in less diverse markets. These results are robust across several econometric specifications and emphasise the stabilising role played by ownership diversity in modern financial systems. At the same time, our evidence suggests that a more interdisciplinary approach, firmly grounded in the applied, empirical research methodology, can provide novel and useful insights into the implications of monetary policy for financial and economic outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:1329 / 1364
页数:36
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Digital transformation, monetary policy and risk-taking of banks
    Ding, Qiaoying
    He, Wensheng
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2023, 55
  • [22] Corporate debt and unconventional monetary policy: The risk-taking channel with bond and loan contracts
    Takaoka, Sumiko
    Takahashi, Koji
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL STABILITY, 2022, 60
  • [23] The Risk-Taking Channel of Monetary Policy in the US: Evidence from Corporate Loan Data
    Delis, Manthos D.
    Hasan, Iftekhar
    Mylonidis, Nikolaos
    JOURNAL OF MONEY CREDIT AND BANKING, 2017, 49 (01) : 187 - 213
  • [24] THE RISK-TAKING CHANNEL OF MONETARY POLICY: DO MACROPRUDENTIAL REGULATION AND CENTRAL BANK INDEPENDENCE INFLUENCE THE TRANSMISSION OF INTEREST RATES?
    Andries, Alin-Marius
    Plescau, Ioana
    ROMANIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC FORECASTING, 2020, 23 (03): : 5 - 30
  • [25] Bank Leverage and Monetary Policy's Risk-Taking Channel: Evidence from the United States
    Dell'Ariccia, Giovanni
    Laeven, Luc
    Suarez, Gustavo A.
    JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2017, 72 (02): : 613 - 654
  • [26] Bank liquidity and the risk-taking channel of monetary policy: An empirical study of the banking system in China
    Wang, Cong
    Zhuang, Lihuan
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (12):
  • [27] Research on monetary policy uncertainty and commercial banks' risk-taking
    Li L.
    Huang X.
    Xitong Gongcheng Lilun yu Shijian/System Engineering Theory and Practice, 2022, 42 (04): : 847 - 864
  • [28] How does capital regulation react to monetary policy? New evidence on the risk-taking channel
    de Moraes, Claudio Oliveira
    Montes, Gabriel Caldas
    Pereira Antunes, Jose Americo
    ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2016, 56 : 177 - 186
  • [29] The Role of Capital Regulation and Risk-Taking by Banks in Monetary Policy
    Olszak, Malgorzata
    OECONOMIA COPERNICANA, 2014, 5 (01) : 7 - 26
  • [30] Sooner or Later: Timing of Monetary Policy with Heterogeneous Risk-Taking
    Choi, Dong Beom
    Eisenbach, Thomas M.
    Yorulmazer, Tanju
    AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2016, 106 (05): : 490 - 495