Comparison of threshold estimation in infants with hearing loss or normal hearing using auditory steady-state response evoked by narrow band CE-chirps and auditory brainstem response evoked by tone pips

被引:19
|
作者
Michel, Franck [1 ]
Jorgensen, Kristoffer Foldager [1 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Audiol Clin, Peter Sabroes Gade 6, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
关键词
Auditory brainstem response; auditory steady-state response; tone pip; narrow band chirp; air-conduction threshold; hearing loss; infants; FREQUENCY-SPECIFIC CHIRP; YOUNG-CHILDREN; TEST TIME; STIMULI; NEWBORNS;
D O I
10.1080/14992027.2016.1234719
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Objective: The objective of this study is to compare air-conduction thresholds obtained with ASSR evoked by narrow band (NB) CE-chirps and ABR evoked by tone pips (tpABR) in infants with various degrees of hearing loss. Design: Thresholds were measured at 500, 1000, 2000 and 4000Hz. Data on each participant were collected at the same day. Study sample: Sixty-seven infants aged 4 d to 22 months (median age=96 days), resulting in 57, 52, 87 and 56 ears for 500, 1000, 2000 and 4000Hz, respectively. Results: Statistical analysis was performed for ears with hearing loss (HL) and showed a very strong correlation between tpABR and ASSR evoked by NB CE-chirps: 0.90 (n=28), 0.90 (n=28), 0.96 (n=42) and 0.95 (n=30) for 500, 1000, 2000 and 4000Hz, respectively. At these frequencies, the mean difference between tpABR and ASSR was -3.6dB (+/- 7.0), -5.2dB (+/- 7.3), -3.9dB (+/- 5.2) and -5.2dB (+/- 4.7). Linear regression analysis indicated that the relationship was not influenced by the degree of hearing loss. Conclusion: We propose that dB nHL to dB eHL correction values for ASSR evoked by NB CE-chirps should be 5dB lower than values used for tpABR.
引用
收藏
页码:99 / 105
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Auditory brainstem response to level-specific CE-CHIRP® threshold estimation in normal-hearing adults
    Dzulkarnain, Ahmad Aidil Arafat
    Shuckri, Suhaila Ahmad
    Ismail, Noraidah
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OTOLOGY, 2020, 26 (03) : 127 - 131
  • [42] Evaluation of Hearing Sensitivity in Young Adults With Normal Hearing Using a 40-Hz Auditory Steady-State Response With CE-Chirp
    Maeda, Hidehiko
    Tamashige, Eiko
    Iwasaki, Narumi
    Urano, Daisuke
    Kanazawa, Ayaka
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2017, 26 (02) : 99 - 109
  • [43] Brainstem auditory-evoked response (BAER) in client-owned pet ferrets with normal hearing
    Piazza, S.
    Huynh, M.
    Cauzinille, L.
    VETERINARY RECORD, 2014, 174 (23) : 581 - U50
  • [45] Threshold prediction using the auditory steady-state response and the tone burst auditory brain stem response: A within-subject comparison
    Johnson, TA
    Brown, CJ
    EAR AND HEARING, 2005, 26 (06): : 559 - 576
  • [46] Comparing pure-tone audiometry and auditory steady state response for the measurement of hearing loss
    Ahn, Joong Ho
    Lee, Hyo-Sook
    Kim, Young-Jin
    Yoon, Tae Hyun
    Chung, Jong Woo
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2007, 136 (06) : 966 - 971
  • [47] A comparison of the brainstem auditory evoked response in healthy ears of unilaterally deaf dogs and bilaterally hearing dogs
    Plonek, M.
    Nicpon, J.
    Kubiak, K.
    Wrzosek, M.
    VETERINARY RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2017, 41 (01) : 23 - 31
  • [48] A comparison of the brainstem auditory evoked response in healthy ears of unilaterally deaf dogs and bilaterally hearing dogs
    M. Plonek
    J. Nicpoń
    K. Kubiak
    M. Wrzosek
    Veterinary Research Communications, 2017, 41 : 23 - 31
  • [49] Detection and differentiation of sensorineural hearing loss in mice using auditory steady-state responses and transient auditory brainstem responses
    Pauli-Magnus, D.
    Hoch, G.
    Strenzke, N.
    Anderson, S.
    Jentsch, T. J.
    Moser, T.
    NEUROSCIENCE, 2007, 149 (03) : 673 - 684
  • [50] 40 Hz auditory steady-state response in eleven subjects with false hearing loss
    Yuksel, Mustafa
    Atilgan, Atilim
    Derinsu, Ufuk
    CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2020, 45 (04) : 600 - 603