Advanced low-complexity compression for maskless lithography data

被引:10
|
作者
Dai, VT [1 ]
Zakhor, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Elect Engn & Comp Sci, Video & Image Proc Lab, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
来源
EMERGING LITHOGRAPHIC TECHNOLOGIES VIII | 2004年 / 5374卷
关键词
compression lithography maskless datapath data-rate layout LZ77 combinatorial BZIP2 algorithm;
D O I
10.1117/12.535768
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
A direct-write maskless lithography system using 25nm for 50nm feature sizes requires data rates of about 10 Tb/s to maintain a throughput of one wafer per minute per layer achieved by today's optical lithography systems. In a previous paper, we presented an architecture that achieves this data rate contingent on 25 to 1 compression of lithography data, and on implementation of a real-time decompressor fabricated on the same chip as a massively parallel array of lithography writers for 50 nm feature sizes. A number of compression techniques, including JBIG, ZIP, the novel 2D-LZ, and BZIP2 were demonstrated to achieve sufficiently high compression ratios on lithography data to make the architecture feasible, although no single technique could achieve this for all test layouts. In this paper we present a novel lossless compression algorithm called Context Copy Combinatorial Code (C4) specifically tailored for lithography data. It successfully combines the advantages of context-based modeling in JBIG and copying in ZIP to achieve higher compression ratios across all test layouts. As part of C4, we have developed a low-complexity binary entropy coding technique called combinatorial coding which is simultaneously as efficient as arithmetic coding and as fast as Huffman coding. Compression results show C4 outperforms JBIG, ZIP, BZIP2, and 2D-LZ, and achieves lossless compression ratios greater than 22 for binary layout image data, and greater than 14 for grey-pixel image data. The tradeoff between decoder buffer size, which directly affects implementation complexity and compression ratio is examined. For the same buffer size, C4 achieves higher compression than LZ77, ZIP, and BZIP2.
引用
收藏
页码:610 / 618
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Scalability and communication in parallel low-complexity lossless compression
    Cinque L.
    de Agostino S.
    Lombardi L.
    Mathematics in Computer Science, 2010, 3 (4) : 391 - 406
  • [22] Low-Complexity Image Compression with Scalable Quality Control
    Pillman, Bruce H.
    Napoli, Michael E.
    SENSORS AND SYSTEMS FOR SPACE APPLICATIONS VII, 2014, 9085
  • [23] Low-complexity rounded KLT approximation for image compression
    Radunz, Anabeth P.
    Bayer, Fabio M.
    Cintra, Renato J.
    JOURNAL OF REAL-TIME IMAGE PROCESSING, 2022, 19 (01) : 173 - 183
  • [24] Low-Complexity Distributed Compression in Wireless Sensor Networks
    Sartipi, Mina
    2012 DATA COMPRESSION CONFERENCE (DCC), 2012, : 227 - 236
  • [25] Low-complexity adaptive lossless compression of hyperspectral imagery
    Klimesh, Matthew
    SATELLITE DATA COMPRESSION, COMMUNICATIONS AND ARCHIVING II, 2006, 6300
  • [26] Low-complexity video compression for wireless sensor networks
    Magli, E
    Mancin, M
    Merello, L
    2003 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MULTIMEDIA AND EXPO, VOL III, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 585 - 588
  • [27] Onboard Low-Complexity Compression of Solar Stereo Images
    Wang, Shuang
    Cui, Lijuan
    Cheng, Samuel
    Stankovic, Lina
    Stankovic, Vladimir
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, 2012, 21 (06) : 3114 - 3118
  • [28] Low-complexity rounded KLT approximation for image compression
    Anabeth P. Radünz
    Fábio M. Bayer
    Renato J. Cintra
    Journal of Real-Time Image Processing, 2022, 19 : 173 - 183
  • [29] Low-complexity and low-memory entropy coder for image compression
    Zhao, DB
    Chan, YK
    Gao, W
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS FOR VIDEO TECHNOLOGY, 2001, 11 (10) : 1140 - 1145
  • [30] Low-complexity approaches to Slepian-Wolf near-lossless distributed data compression
    Coleman, Todd P.
    Lee, Anna H.
    Medard, Muriel
    Effros, Michelle
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION THEORY, 2006, 52 (08) : 3546 - 3561