Advanced low-complexity compression for maskless lithography data

被引:10
|
作者
Dai, VT [1 ]
Zakhor, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Elect Engn & Comp Sci, Video & Image Proc Lab, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
来源
关键词
compression lithography maskless datapath data-rate layout LZ77 combinatorial BZIP2 algorithm;
D O I
10.1117/12.535768
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
A direct-write maskless lithography system using 25nm for 50nm feature sizes requires data rates of about 10 Tb/s to maintain a throughput of one wafer per minute per layer achieved by today's optical lithography systems. In a previous paper, we presented an architecture that achieves this data rate contingent on 25 to 1 compression of lithography data, and on implementation of a real-time decompressor fabricated on the same chip as a massively parallel array of lithography writers for 50 nm feature sizes. A number of compression techniques, including JBIG, ZIP, the novel 2D-LZ, and BZIP2 were demonstrated to achieve sufficiently high compression ratios on lithography data to make the architecture feasible, although no single technique could achieve this for all test layouts. In this paper we present a novel lossless compression algorithm called Context Copy Combinatorial Code (C4) specifically tailored for lithography data. It successfully combines the advantages of context-based modeling in JBIG and copying in ZIP to achieve higher compression ratios across all test layouts. As part of C4, we have developed a low-complexity binary entropy coding technique called combinatorial coding which is simultaneously as efficient as arithmetic coding and as fast as Huffman coding. Compression results show C4 outperforms JBIG, ZIP, BZIP2, and 2D-LZ, and achieves lossless compression ratios greater than 22 for binary layout image data, and greater than 14 for grey-pixel image data. The tradeoff between decoder buffer size, which directly affects implementation complexity and compression ratio is examined. For the same buffer size, C4 achieves higher compression than LZ77, ZIP, and BZIP2.
引用
收藏
页码:610 / 618
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Lossless compression techniques for maskless lithography data
    Dai, V
    Zakhor, A
    EMERGING LITHOGRAPHIC TECHNOLOGIES VI, PTS 1 AND 2, 2002, 4688 : 583 - 594
  • [2] Reduced complexity compression algorithms for direct-write maskless lithography systems
    Liu, Hsin-I
    Dai, Vito
    Zakhor, Avideh
    Nikolic, Borivoje
    EMERGING LITHOGRAPHIC TECHNOLOGIES X, PTS 1 AND 2, 2006, 6151
  • [3] Reduced complexity compression algorithms for direct-write maskless lithography systems
    Liu, Hsin-I
    Dai, Vito
    Zakhor, Avideh
    Nikolic, Borivoje
    JOURNAL OF MICRO-NANOLITHOGRAPHY MEMS AND MOEMS, 2007, 6 (01):
  • [4] Complexity reduction for C4 compression for implementation in maskless lithography datapath
    Dai, V
    Zakhor, A
    EMERGING LITHOGRAPHIC TECHNOLOGIES IX, PTS 1 AND 2, 2005, 5751 : 366 - 381
  • [5] Low-Complexity Compression for Sensory Systems
    Leon-Salas, Walter D.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS II-EXPRESS BRIEFS, 2015, 62 (04) : 322 - 326
  • [6] Low-complexity compression of short messages
    Rein, Stephan
    Guhmann, Clemens
    Fitzek, Rank H. P.
    DCC 2006: DATA COMPRESSION CONFERENCE, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, : 123 - +
  • [7] A LOW-COMPLEXITY SCREEN COMPRESSION SCHEME
    Pan, Zhaotai
    Shen, Huifeng
    Lu, Yan
    Yu, Nenghai
    Li, Shipeng
    2012 IEEE VISUAL COMMUNICATIONS AND IMAGE PROCESSING (VCIP), 2012,
  • [8] Low-Complexity Compression with Random Access
    Kamparaju, Srikanth
    Mastan, Shaik
    Vatedka, Shashank
    2022 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SIGNAL PROCESSING AND COMMUNICATIONS, SPCOM, 2022,
  • [9] ONBOARD LOW-COMPLEXITY COMPRESSION OF SOLAR IMAGES
    Wang, Shuang
    Cui, Lijuan
    Cheng, Samuel
    Stankovic, Lina
    Stankovic, Vladimir
    2011 18TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON IMAGE PROCESSING (ICIP), 2011,
  • [10] Low-Complexity Video Compression and Compressive Sensing
    Asif, M. Salman
    Fernandes, Felix
    Romberg, Justin
    2013 ASILOMAR CONFERENCE ON SIGNALS, SYSTEMS AND COMPUTERS, 2013, : 579 - 583