Multi-agency safeguarding arrangements: overcoming the challenges of Covid-19 measures

被引:9
|
作者
Driscoll, Jennifer [1 ]
Lorek, Ann [1 ]
Kinnear, Elise [1 ]
Hutchinson, Aisha [1 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll London, Sch Educ Commun & Soc, London, England
关键词
Multi-agency safeguarding arrangements; Covid-19; Child protection; Referral to children's services; Remote working; Vulnerable children and families;
D O I
10.1108/JCS-07-2020-0035
中图分类号
C916 [社会工作、社会管理、社会规划];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
Purpose Information sharing and joint working between agencies undertaking direct work with children have long been recognised as fundamental to robust and effective safeguarding and child protection arrangements. The public health response to Covid-19 disrupted those arrangements abruptly. This study aims to identify some of the innovative practices that have been implemented and how responses might inform planning for multi-agency working in the future. Design/methodology/approach This study presents reflections on preliminary fieldwork from a study of how agencies in London are responding to the challenges for multi-agency safeguarding arrangements created by the Covid-19 measures. It draws on the experience of expert practitioners in the research team as well as interviews with 17 senior professionals from local authorities, safeguarding partnerships and health. Findings The study participants endorsed known concerns around increased risks to children and raised new concerns about particular groups of children that under normal circumstances would not have been at risk. They identified some unexpected benefits derived from new arrangements, especially in relation to engagement with remote working. Originality/value Early insights are offered into promising initiatives to preserve strong multi-agency arrangements in crises and strengthen the resilience of the child protection system.
引用
收藏
页码:267 / 274
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Safeguarding Adults Together under the Care Act 2014: A Multi-Agency Practice Guide
    Preston-Shoot, Michael
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK, 2021, 51 (07): : 2857 - 2859
  • [22] multi-agency working models, challenges and key factors for success
    Atkinson, Mary
    Doherty, Paul
    Kinder, Kay
    JOURNAL OF EARLY CHILDHOOD RESEARCH, 2005, 3 (01) : 7 - 17
  • [23] COVID-19: overcoming the challenges faced by individuals with autism and their families
    Eshraghi, Adrien A.
    Li, Crystal
    Alessandri, Michael
    Messinger, Daniel S.
    Eshraghi, Rebecca S.
    Mittal, Rahul
    Armstrong, F. Daniel
    LANCET PSYCHIATRY, 2020, 7 (06): : 481 - 483
  • [24] Improving multi-agency coordination: Overcoming the barriers to communication-a case study
    Finney A.
    Crime Prevention and Community Safety, 2002, 4 (4): : 33 - 45
  • [25] Operation provide: a multi-agency response to increasing police engagement in cases of intimate partner violence during the COVID-19 pandemic
    Halford, Eric
    Smith, Jonathan
    POLICE PRACTICE AND RESEARCH, 2022, 23 (05) : 600 - 613
  • [26] Special Measures for Children in Court: Law in Action in a Multi-agency Committee
    Goodman-Delahunty, Jane
    Martschuk, Natalie
    Powell, Martine
    Westera, Nina
    AUSTRALIAN SOCIAL WORK, 2019, 72 (04) : 503 - 516
  • [27] Safeguarding adults practice and remote working in the COVID-19 era: challenges and opportunities
    Anka, Ann
    Thacker, Helen
    Penhale, Bridget
    JOURNAL OF ADULT PROTECTION, 2020, 22 (06): : 415 - 427
  • [28] A joined up approach to safeguarding and personalisation: a framework for practice in multi-agency decision-making
    Galpin, Diane
    Hughes, Dorena
    JOURNAL OF ADULT PROTECTION, 2011, 13 (03): : 150 - 159
  • [29] Safeguarding adults together under the Care Act 2014. A multi-agency practice guide
    Brighton, Hilary
    JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK, 2022, 22 (02) : 589 - 591
  • [30] Challenges in multi-agency collaboration in disaster management: A Sri Lankan perspective
    Abdeen, F. N.
    Fernando, T.
    Kulatunga, U.
    Hettige, S.
    Ranasinghe, K. D. Arjuna
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2021, 62