Multi-agency safeguarding arrangements: overcoming the challenges of Covid-19 measures

被引:9
|
作者
Driscoll, Jennifer [1 ]
Lorek, Ann [1 ]
Kinnear, Elise [1 ]
Hutchinson, Aisha [1 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll London, Sch Educ Commun & Soc, London, England
关键词
Multi-agency safeguarding arrangements; Covid-19; Child protection; Referral to children's services; Remote working; Vulnerable children and families;
D O I
10.1108/JCS-07-2020-0035
中图分类号
C916 [社会工作、社会管理、社会规划];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
Purpose Information sharing and joint working between agencies undertaking direct work with children have long been recognised as fundamental to robust and effective safeguarding and child protection arrangements. The public health response to Covid-19 disrupted those arrangements abruptly. This study aims to identify some of the innovative practices that have been implemented and how responses might inform planning for multi-agency working in the future. Design/methodology/approach This study presents reflections on preliminary fieldwork from a study of how agencies in London are responding to the challenges for multi-agency safeguarding arrangements created by the Covid-19 measures. It draws on the experience of expert practitioners in the research team as well as interviews with 17 senior professionals from local authorities, safeguarding partnerships and health. Findings The study participants endorsed known concerns around increased risks to children and raised new concerns about particular groups of children that under normal circumstances would not have been at risk. They identified some unexpected benefits derived from new arrangements, especially in relation to engagement with remote working. Originality/value Early insights are offered into promising initiatives to preserve strong multi-agency arrangements in crises and strengthen the resilience of the child protection system.
引用
收藏
页码:267 / 274
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A MULTI-AGENCY COVID-19 DASHBOARD WITH SATELLITE AIR QUALITY DATA
    Lefer, Barry
    Crisp, David
    Fastnacht, Zachary
    Lamsal, Lok
    Jucks, Ken
    Seadler, Abigail
    Zehner, Claus
    International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), 2021, 2021-July : 1553 - 1555
  • [2] Strengthening multi-agency public protection arrangements
    Madoc-Jones, Iolo
    PROBATION JOURNAL, 2006, 53 (02) : 170 - 171
  • [3] Safeguarding vulnerable adults: exploring the challenges to best practice across multi-agency settings
    Stevens, Emma
    JOURNAL OF ADULT PROTECTION, 2013, 15 (02): : 85 - 95
  • [4] Protecting and Safeguarding Children in Schools: A Multi-Agency Approach
    Bellinger, Avril
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK, 2024, 54 (07): : 3418 - 3419
  • [6] Practitioner perspectives of multi-agency safeguarding hubs (MASH)
    Shorrock, Sarah
    McManus, Michelle M.
    Kirby, Stuart
    JOURNAL OF ADULT PROTECTION, 2020, 22 (01): : 9 - 20
  • [7] Life & Times Supporting the 'multi' in multi-agency working: learning with and from each other could enable multi-agency safeguarding
    Dixon, Sharon
    Kendall, Bryony
    Driscoll, Jenny
    Pope, Catherine
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2022, 72 (722): : 438 - 439
  • [8] Thematic inspection of Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements
    Rawlinson, Laura
    PROBATION JOURNAL, 2012, 59 (02) : 166 - 167
  • [9] Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements and Youth Justice
    Horn, Robert
    Paylor, Ian
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK, 2009, 39 (05): : 978 - 980
  • [10] Multi-agency working: challenges in getting it right
    Coccia, Floriana
    Robertson, Kate
    PSYCHIATRIC BULLETIN, 2009, 33 (04): : 124 - 126