Docetaxel Versus Surveillance After Radical Prostatectomy for High-risk Prostate Cancer: Results from the Prospective Randomised, Open-label Phase 3 Scandinavian Prostate Cancer Group 12 Trial

被引:46
|
作者
Ahlgren, Goran M. [1 ]
Flodgren, Per [2 ]
Tammela, Teuvo L. J. [3 ]
Kellokumpu-Lehtinen, Pirkko [4 ]
Borre, Michael [5 ]
Angelsen, Anders [6 ]
Iversen, Jon Reidar [7 ]
Sverrisdottir, Asgerdur [8 ]
Jonsson, Eirikur [9 ]
Sengelov, Lisa [10 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Skane Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, Jan Waldenstroms Gata 5, S-20502 Malmo, Sweden
[2] Lund Univ, Skane Univ Hosp, Dept Oncol, Malmo, Sweden
[3] Univ Tampere, Tampere Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, Tampere, Finland
[4] Univ Tampere, Tampere Univ Hosp, Dept Oncol, Tampere, Finland
[5] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Skejby Sygehus, Dept Urol, Aarhus, Denmark
[6] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Urol, Trondheim, Norway
[7] Oslo Univ Hosp, Dept Oncol, Oslo, Norway
[8] Landspitali Univ Hosp, Dept Oncol, Reykjavik, Iceland
[9] Landspitali Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, Reykjavik, Iceland
[10] Herlev Gentofte Hosp, Dept Oncol, Herlev, Denmark
关键词
Prostate cancer; Adjuvant; Docetaxel; Randomised trial; Radical prostatectomy; THERAPY; ESTRAMUSTINE; MITOXANTRONE; PREDNISONE; MEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.eururo.2018.01.012
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Adjuvant chemotherapy is standard treatment for other solid tumours, but to date has not proven effective in prostate cancer. Objective: o evaluate whether six cycles of docetaxel alone improve biochemical disease-free survival after radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer. Design, setting, and participants: Open-label, randomised multinational phase 3 trial. Enrolment of 459 patients after prostatectomy. Inclusion criteria: high-risk pT2 margin positive or pT3a Gleason score >= 4+3, pT3b, or lymph node positive disease Gleason score >= 3 + 4. Patients assigned (1:1) to either six cycles of adjuvant docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) every 3 wk without daily prednisone (Arm A) or surveillance (Arm B) until endpoint was reached. Primary endpoint was prostate-specific antigen progression >= 0.5 ng/ml. Intervention: Docetaxel treatment after prostatectomy. Intervention: Docetaxel treatment after prostatectomy. Results and limitations: Median time to progression, death, or last follow-up was 56.8 mo. Primary endpoint was reached in 190/459 patients-the risk of progression at 5 yr being 41% (45% in Arm A and 38% in Arm B). There was evidence of nonproportional hazards in Kaplan-Meier analysis, so we used the difference in restricted mean survival time as the primary estimate of effect. Restricted mean survival time to endpoint was 43 mo in Arm A versus 46 mo in Arm B (p = 0.06), a nonsignificant difference of 3.2 mo (95% confidence interval: 6.7 to - 1.5 mo). A total of 116 serious adverse events were recorded in Arm A and 41 in Arm B with no treatment-related deaths. Not all patients received docetaxel by protocol. The endpoint is biochemical progression and some patients received radiation treatment before the endpoint. Conclusions: Docetaxel without hormonal therapy did not significantly improve biochemical disease-free survival after radical prostatectomy. Patient summary: In this randomised trial, we tested whether chemotherapy after surgery for high-risk prostate cancer decreases the risk of a rising prostate-specific antigen. We found no benefit from docetaxel given after radical prostatectomy. (C) 2018 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:870 / 876
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Pathological results and rates of treatment failure in high-risk prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy
    Walz, Jochen
    Joniau, Steven
    Chun, Felix K.
    Isbarn, Hendrik
    Jeldres, Claudio
    Yossepowitch, Ofer
    Chao-Yu, Hsu
    Klein, Eric A.
    Scardino, Peter T.
    Reuther, Alwyn
    Van Poppel, Hein
    Graefen, Markus
    Huland, Hartwig
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 107 (05) : 765 - 770
  • [32] Primary radiotherapy versus radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer A Decision Analysis
    Parikh, Ravi
    Sher, David J.
    CANCER, 2012, 118 (01) : 258 - 267
  • [33] Primary Radiotherapy versus Radical Prostatectomy for High-risk Prostate Cancer: A Decision Analysis
    Parikh, R. B.
    Sher, D. J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 81 (02): : S556 - S556
  • [34] Survival after Radical Prostatectomy versus Radiation Therapy in High-Risk and Very High-Risk Prostate Cancer. Reply
    Chierigo, Francesco
    Borghesi, Marco
    Mantica, Guglielmo
    Terrone, Carlo
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 208 (01): : 224 - 224
  • [35] Hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for patients with localised prostate cancer (HYPRO): final efficacy results from a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 trial
    Incrocci, Luca
    Wortel, Ruud C.
    Alemayehu, Wendimagegn Ghidey
    Aluwini, Shafak
    Schimmel, Erik
    Krol, Stijn
    van der Toorn, Peter-Paul
    de Jager, Hanja
    Heemsbergen, Wilma
    Heijmen, Ben
    Pos, Floris
    LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2016, 17 (08): : 1061 - 1069
  • [36] Outcomes of very high-risk prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy: Validation study from 3 centers
    Sundi, Debasish
    Tosoian, Jeffrey J.
    Nyame, Yaw A.
    Alam, Ridwan
    Achim, Mary
    Reichard, Chad A.
    Li, Jianbo
    Wilkins, Lamont
    Schwen, Zeyad
    Han, Misop
    Davis, John W.
    Klein, Eric A.
    Schaeffer, Edward M.
    Stephenson, Andrew J.
    Ross, Ashley E.
    Chapin, Brian F.
    CANCER, 2019, 125 (03) : 391 - 397
  • [37] Perioperative Morbidity of Radical Prostatectomy After Intensive Neoadjuvant Androgen Blockade in Men With High-Risk Prostate Cancer: Results of Phase II Trial Compared to a Control Group
    Ilario, Eder N.
    Bastos, Diogo A.
    Guglielmetti, Giuliano B.
    Murta, Claudio B.
    Cardili, Leonardo
    Cordeiro, Mauricio D.
    Junior, Jose P.
    Coelho, Rafael F.
    Nahas, William C.
    CLINICAL GENITOURINARY CANCER, 2023, 21 (01) : 43 - 54
  • [38] Adjuvant Leuprolide With or Without Docetaxel in Patients With High-Risk Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy (TAX-3501)
    Schweizer, Michael T.
    Huang, Peng
    Kattan, Michael W.
    Kibel, Adam S.
    de Wit, Ronald
    Sternberg, Cora N.
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    Eisenberger, Mario A.
    CANCER, 2013, 119 (20) : 3610 - 3618
  • [39] Custirsen in combination with docetaxel and prednisone for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (SYNERGY trial): a phase 3, multicentre, open-label, randomised trial
    Chi, Kim N.
    Higano, Celestia S.
    Blumenstein, Brent
    Ferrero, Jean-Marc
    Reeves, James
    Feyerabend, Susan
    Gravis, Gwenaelle
    Merseburger, Axel S.
    Stenzl, Arnulf
    Bergman, Andries M.
    Mukherjee, Som D.
    Zalewski, Pawel
    Saad, Fred
    Jacobs, Cindy
    Gleave, Martin
    de Bono, Johann S.
    LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2017, 18 (04): : 473 - 485
  • [40] Neoadjuvant docetaxel and estramustine followed by radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy for patients with high-risk prostate cancer
    Stefaniak, H
    Wallen, E
    Baggstrom, M
    Godley, P
    Rosenman, J
    Goyal, L
    Whang, Y
    Pruthi, RS
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2005, 173 (04): : 190 - 190