Docetaxel Versus Surveillance After Radical Prostatectomy for High-risk Prostate Cancer: Results from the Prospective Randomised, Open-label Phase 3 Scandinavian Prostate Cancer Group 12 Trial

被引:46
|
作者
Ahlgren, Goran M. [1 ]
Flodgren, Per [2 ]
Tammela, Teuvo L. J. [3 ]
Kellokumpu-Lehtinen, Pirkko [4 ]
Borre, Michael [5 ]
Angelsen, Anders [6 ]
Iversen, Jon Reidar [7 ]
Sverrisdottir, Asgerdur [8 ]
Jonsson, Eirikur [9 ]
Sengelov, Lisa [10 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Skane Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, Jan Waldenstroms Gata 5, S-20502 Malmo, Sweden
[2] Lund Univ, Skane Univ Hosp, Dept Oncol, Malmo, Sweden
[3] Univ Tampere, Tampere Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, Tampere, Finland
[4] Univ Tampere, Tampere Univ Hosp, Dept Oncol, Tampere, Finland
[5] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Skejby Sygehus, Dept Urol, Aarhus, Denmark
[6] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Urol, Trondheim, Norway
[7] Oslo Univ Hosp, Dept Oncol, Oslo, Norway
[8] Landspitali Univ Hosp, Dept Oncol, Reykjavik, Iceland
[9] Landspitali Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, Reykjavik, Iceland
[10] Herlev Gentofte Hosp, Dept Oncol, Herlev, Denmark
关键词
Prostate cancer; Adjuvant; Docetaxel; Randomised trial; Radical prostatectomy; THERAPY; ESTRAMUSTINE; MITOXANTRONE; PREDNISONE; MEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.eururo.2018.01.012
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Adjuvant chemotherapy is standard treatment for other solid tumours, but to date has not proven effective in prostate cancer. Objective: o evaluate whether six cycles of docetaxel alone improve biochemical disease-free survival after radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer. Design, setting, and participants: Open-label, randomised multinational phase 3 trial. Enrolment of 459 patients after prostatectomy. Inclusion criteria: high-risk pT2 margin positive or pT3a Gleason score >= 4+3, pT3b, or lymph node positive disease Gleason score >= 3 + 4. Patients assigned (1:1) to either six cycles of adjuvant docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) every 3 wk without daily prednisone (Arm A) or surveillance (Arm B) until endpoint was reached. Primary endpoint was prostate-specific antigen progression >= 0.5 ng/ml. Intervention: Docetaxel treatment after prostatectomy. Intervention: Docetaxel treatment after prostatectomy. Results and limitations: Median time to progression, death, or last follow-up was 56.8 mo. Primary endpoint was reached in 190/459 patients-the risk of progression at 5 yr being 41% (45% in Arm A and 38% in Arm B). There was evidence of nonproportional hazards in Kaplan-Meier analysis, so we used the difference in restricted mean survival time as the primary estimate of effect. Restricted mean survival time to endpoint was 43 mo in Arm A versus 46 mo in Arm B (p = 0.06), a nonsignificant difference of 3.2 mo (95% confidence interval: 6.7 to - 1.5 mo). A total of 116 serious adverse events were recorded in Arm A and 41 in Arm B with no treatment-related deaths. Not all patients received docetaxel by protocol. The endpoint is biochemical progression and some patients received radiation treatment before the endpoint. Conclusions: Docetaxel without hormonal therapy did not significantly improve biochemical disease-free survival after radical prostatectomy. Patient summary: In this randomised trial, we tested whether chemotherapy after surgery for high-risk prostate cancer decreases the risk of a rising prostate-specific antigen. We found no benefit from docetaxel given after radical prostatectomy. (C) 2018 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:870 / 876
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Re: Docetaxel Versus Surveillance After Radical Prostatectomy for High-risk Prostate Cancer: Results from the Prospective Randomised, Open-label Phase 3 Scandinavian Prostate Cancer Group 12 Trial
    D'Andrea, David
    Shariat, Shahrokh F.
    Soria, Francesco
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2018, 74 (05) : 680 - 681
  • [2] Docetaxel Versus Surveillance After Radical Radiotherapy for Intermediate- or High-risk Prostate Cancer-Results from the Prospective, Randomised, Open-label Phase III SPCG-13 Trial
    Kellokumpu-Lehtinen, Pirkko-Liisa
    Hjalm-Eriksson, Marie
    Thellenberg-Karlsson, Camilla
    Astrom, Lennart
    Franzen, Lars
    Fransson, Ann-Sofie
    Leskinen, Markku J.
    Zeke, Mihalj
    Huttunen, Teppo
    Ginman, Claes
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2019, 76 (06) : 823 - 830
  • [3] Adverse effect of docetaxel versus surveillance after radical prostatectomy for high risk prostate cancer: Post-hoc analysis of the prospective randomized, open-label phase III SPCG 12 trial.
    Ahlgren, Goran M.
    Borre, Michael
    Sengelov, Lisa
    Tammela, Teuvo L. J.
    Kellokumpu-Lehtinen, Pirkko
    Sverrisdottir, Asgerdur
    Iversen, Jon Reidar
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 36 (06)
  • [4] Docetaxel Versus Surveillance After Radical Radiotherapy for Intermediate- or High-risk Prostate Cancer-Results from the Prospective, Randomised, Open-label Phase III SPCG-13 Trial (vol 76, pg 823, 2019)
    Kellokumpu-Lehtinen, Pirkko-Liisa
    Hjalm-Eriksson, Marie
    Thellenberg-Karlsson, Camilla
    Astrom, Lennat
    Franzen, Lars
    Fransson, Ann-Fofie
    Leskinen, Markku J.
    Zeke, Mihalj
    Huttunen, Teppo
    Ginman, Claes
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2020, 78 (06) : E241 - E242
  • [5] A randomized phase III trial between adjuvant docetaxel and surveillance after radical prostatectomy for high risk prostate cancer: Results of SPCG12.
    Ahlgren, Goran
    Flodgren, Per
    Tammela, Teuvo L. J.
    Kellokumpu-Lehtinen, Pirkko
    Borre, Michael
    Angelsen, Anders
    Iversen, Jon Reidar
    Sverrisdottir, Asgerdur
    Jonsson, Eirikur
    Sengelov, Lisa
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 34 (15)
  • [6] Adjuvant weekly docetaxel for high-risk prostate cancer patients after Radical Prostatectomy
    Kibel, AS
    Picus, J
    Cookson, MS
    Roth, B
    Jarrard, DF
    Wilding, G
    Klein, EA
    Dreicer, R
    Nelson, JB
    Chatta, G
    Benson, MC
    Petrylak, DP
    DiPaola, R
    Beer, TM
    Diamond, J
    Partin, AW
    Eisenberger, MA
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2005, 173 (04): : 222 - 222
  • [7] Adjuvant weekly docetaxel for high-risk prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy
    Kibel, AS
    Kattan, MW
    Picus, J
    Dreicer, R
    Klein, EA
    Wilding, G
    Jarrard, DF
    Roth, B
    Cookson, MS
    Pettylak, DP
    Chatta, G
    Nelson, JB
    Beer, TM
    Dipaola, R
    Partin, AI
    Rosenbaum, E
    Garrett, E
    Sugar, E
    Eisenberger, M
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 175 (04): : 512 - 512
  • [8] OPEN VERSUS MINIMALLY-INVASIVE RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY FOR HIGH-RISK PROSTATE CANCER
    Pierorazio, Phillip M.
    Mullins, Jeffrey K.
    Voth, Kipp D.
    Hyams, Elias S.
    Han, Misop
    Bivalacqua, Trinity J.
    Schaeffer, Edward M.
    Allaf, Mohamad E.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2011, 25 : A109 - A109
  • [9] Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in localized prostate cancer:: the Scandinavian Prostate Cancer Group-4 randomized trial
    Bill-Axelson, Anna
    Holmberg, Lars
    Filen, Frej
    Ruutu, Mirja
    Garmo, Hans
    Busch, Christer
    Nordling, Stig
    Haggman, Michael
    Andersson, Swen-Olof
    Bratell, Stefan
    Spangberg, Anders
    Palmgren, Juni
    Adami, Hans-Olov
    Johansson, Jan-Erik
    JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2008, 100 (16) : 1144 - 1154
  • [10] Survival after Radical Prostatectomy versus Radiation Therapy in High-Risk and Very High-Risk Prostate Cancer
    Chierigo, Francesco
    Wenzel, Mike
    Wuernschimmel, Christoph
    Flammia, Rocco Simone
    Horlemann, Benedikt
    Tian, Zhe
    Saad, Fred
    Chun, Felix K. H.
    Graefen, Markus
    Gallucci, Michele
    Shariat, Shahrokh F.
    Mantica, Guglielmo
    Borghesi, Marco
    Suardi, Nazareno
    Terrone, Carlo
    Karakiewicz, Pierre, I
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 207 (02): : 376 - 383