An Integrated Indicator Framework for the Assessment of Multifunctional Green Infrastructure-Exemplified in a European City

被引:26
|
作者
Wang, Jingxia [1 ,2 ]
Pauleit, Stephan [2 ]
Banzhaf, Ellen [1 ]
机构
[1] UFZ Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Dept Urban & Environm Sociol, Permoserstr 15, D-04318 Leipzig, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Munich, TUM Sch Life Sci, Chair Strateg Landscape Planning & Management, Emil Ramann Str 6, D-85354 Freising Weihenstephan, Germany
关键词
Ecosystem Services (ESS); multifunctionality; GI assessment; urban planning; sustainable development; remote sensing application; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; CONCEPTUAL-FRAMEWORK; BIODIVERSITY; MANAGEMENT; HOTSPOTS; SPACE;
D O I
10.3390/rs11161869
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The aim of this study is to provide an integrated indicator framework for the Assessment of Multifunctional Green Infrastructure (AMGI) to advance the evolution of the Green Infrastructure (GI) concept, and simultaneously deliver an approach do conduct a GI assessment using remote sensing datasets at multiple spatial and spectral scales. Based on this framework, we propose an explicit methodology for AMGI, while addressing the multi-dimensional pillars (ecology, socio-economy, socio-culture, and human health) for urban sustainability and the multifunctionality of GI. For the purpose of validation, we present the extensive process of employing our framework and methodology, and give an illustrative case exemplified in a European city, i.e., Leipzig, Germany. In this exemplification, we deployed three stages regarding how a single assessment can be conducted: from conceptual framework for priority setting, contextual assessment, to retrospective assessment. In this illustrative case study, we enclosed 18 indicators, as well as identified hot and cold spots of selected GI functions and their multifunctionality. A clear framework and methodology is crucial for the sustainable management of spatially oriented GI plans over time and for different stakeholder groups. Therefore, GI planners and policy makers may now refer to our integrative indicator framework and provided application methodology as common grounds for a better mutual understanding amongst scientists and stakeholders. This study contributes to discourses regarding the enhancement of the GI concept and is expected to provoke more discussion on the improvements of high-quality Remote Sensing (RS) data as well as the development of remote sensing-based methods at multiple spatial, temporal, and spectral scales to support GI plans.
引用
收藏
页数:35
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A Novel AI-Based Integrated Cybersecurity Risk Assessment Framework and Resilience of National Critical Infrastructure
    Ali, Sardar Muhammad
    Razzaque, Abdul
    Yousaf, Muhammad
    Ali, Sardar Sadaqat
    IEEE ACCESS, 2025, 13 : 12427 - 12446
  • [32] A goal oriented indicator framework to support integrated assessment of new policies for agri-environmental systems
    Olsson, Johanna Alkan
    Bockstaller, Christian
    Stapleton, Lee M.
    Ewert, Frank
    Knapen, Rob
    Therond, Olivier
    Geniaux, Ghislain
    Bellon, Stephane
    Correira, Teresa Pinto
    Turpin, Nadine
    Bezlepkina, Irina
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2009, 12 (05) : 562 - 572
  • [33] A novel framework for prioritization and spatial suitability assessment of Blue-Green infrastructure for urban pluvial flood resilience
    Ambily, P.
    Chithra, N. R.
    Firoz, Mohammed
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2025, 655
  • [34] Integrated design process of green building projects: A review towards assessment metrics and conceptual framework
    Ikudayisi, Ayodele Emmanuel
    Chan, Albert P. C.
    Darko, Amos
    Adegun, Olumuyiwa Bayode
    JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2022, 50
  • [35] Towards the Development of an Integrated Sustainability and Resilience Benefits Assessment Framework of Urban Green Growth Interventions
    Grafakos, Stelios
    Gianoli, Alberto
    Tsatsou, Alexandra
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2016, 8 (05)
  • [36] Integrated assessments of green infrastructure for flood mitigation to support robust decision-making for sponge city construction in an urbanized watershed
    Mei, Chao
    Liu, Jiahong
    Wang, Hao
    Yang, Zhiyong
    Ding, Xiangyi
    Shao, Weiwei
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 639 : 1394 - 1407
  • [37] Benchmarking Nature-Based Solution and Smart City Assessment Schemes Against the Sustainable Development Goal Indicator Framework
    Wendling, Laura A.
    Huovila, Aapo
    Castell-Rudenhausen, Malin Zu
    Hukkalainen, Mari
    Airaksinen, Miimu
    FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2018, 6
  • [38] Integrated assessment results depend on aggregation method and framework structure - A case study within the European Marine Strategy Framework Directive
    Probst, W. Nikolaus
    Lynam, Christopher P.
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2016, 61 : 871 - 881
  • [39] Construction, assessment, and protection of green infrastructure networks from a dynamic perspective: A case study of Dalian City, Liaoning Province, China
    Lyu, Liang
    Sho, Kojiro
    Zhao, Han
    Song, Youngkeun
    Uchiyama, Yuta
    Kim, Jihwan
    Sakai, Takeru
    URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING, 2024, 101
  • [40] GIS-Based Urban Traffic Assessment in a Historical European City under the Influence of Infrastructure Works and COVID-19
    Droj, Gabriela
    Droj, Laureniu
    Badea, Ana-Cornelia
    Dragomir, Petre Iuliu
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2023, 13 (03):