A holey cavity for single-transducer 3D ultrasound imaging with physical optimization

被引:5
|
作者
Ghanbarzadeh-Dagheyan, Ashkan [1 ,4 ]
Heredia-Juesas, Juan [2 ,3 ]
Liu, Chang [2 ]
Molaei, Ali [3 ]
Martinez-Lorenzo, Jose Angel [2 ,3 ]
Vahdat, Bijan Vosoughi [4 ]
Ahmadian, Mohammad Taghi [1 ]
机构
[1] Sharif Univ Technol, Dept Mech Engn, Tehran, Iran
[2] Northeastern Univ, Dept Mech & Ind Engn, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Northeastern Univ, Dept Elect Engn, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Sharif Univ Technol, Dept Elect Engn, Tehran, Iran
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Compressive sensing; Holey cavity; Born approximation; Singular values; Ultrasound imaging; Tumor detection; Subwavelength imaging; RECONSTRUCTION; SENSOR; RADAR; MRI;
D O I
10.1016/j.sigpro.2020.107826
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Within the compressive sensing (CS) framework, one effective way to increase the likelihood of successful signal reconstruction is to employ random processes in the construction of the sensing matrix. This study presents a 3D holey cavity, with diverse frequency modes, to spectrally code, that is, randomize, the ultrasound wave fields. The simulated results show that the use of such a cavity enables imaging simple or complex targets, such as spheres or the letter E, by only a single transceiver-something that is not possible without the use of a coding structure like the cavity. The effect of noise on imaging results and the size of the targets on the first-order Born approximation (BA) are also investigated. Moreover, this study attempts to optimize the cavity, based on a single numerical metric, such as the sum of singular values (SSV) or mutual coherence (MC). Yet, it will be shown that neither of these metrics can consistently compare the norm-one imaging performance between two cavities of different materials or hole sizes. This leaves finding a quantitative metric for these kinds of optimizations an open problem. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Real-time 3D ultrasound imaging
    Ponomaryov, VI
    Sansores-Pech, R
    Gallegos-Funes, F
    Real-Time Imaging IX, 2005, 5671 : 19 - 29
  • [42] Development and evaluation of a 3D ultrasound imaging system
    Tong, SD
    Cardinal, HN
    Downey, D
    Fenster, A
    WHERE INSTRUMENTATION IS GOING - CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1 AND 2, 1998, : 562 - 565
  • [43] Real time 3D ultrasound imaging of the brain
    Ivancevich, NM
    Chu, KK
    Dahl, JD
    Light, ED
    Trahey, GE
    Idriss, SF
    Wolf, PD
    Dixon-Tulloch, E
    Smith, SW
    2004 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, Vols 1-3, 2004, : 110 - 113
  • [44] 3D ultrasound computer tomography for medical imaging
    Gemmeke, H.
    Ruiter, N. V.
    NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION A-ACCELERATORS SPECTROMETERS DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT, 2007, 580 (02): : 1057 - 1065
  • [45] MMSE Reconstruction for 3D Freehand Ultrasound Imaging
    Huang, Wei
    Zheng, Yibin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL IMAGING, 2008, 2008 (2008)
  • [46] 3D ultrasound strain imaging of the puborectal muscle
    Das, S.
    Hansen, H.
    Hendriks, C.
    van den Noort, F.
    Manzini, C.
    van der Vaart, C.
    de Korte, C.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2020, 31 (SUPPL 1) : S198 - S199
  • [47] Alignment-by-reconstruction for 3D ultrasound imaging
    Sanches, JM
    Marques, JS
    15TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PATTERN RECOGNITION, VOL 3, PROCEEDINGS: IMAGE, SPEECH AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2000, : 37 - 40
  • [48] 3D ULTRASOUND STRAIN IMAGING OF PUBORECTALIS MUSCLE
    Das, Shreya
    Hansen, Hendrik H. G.
    Hendriks, Gijs A. G. M.
    van den Noort, Frieda
    Manzini, Claudia
    van der Vaart, C. Huub
    de Korte, Chris L.
    ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2021, 47 (03): : 569 - 581
  • [49] 3D ultrasound imaging of the human corpus luteum
    Brezinka, Christoph
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2014, 14 (02) : 110 - 114
  • [50] Refraction Correction in 3D Transcranial Ultrasound Imaging
    Lindsey, Brooks D.
    Smith, Stephen W.
    ULTRASONIC IMAGING, 2014, 36 (01) : 35 - 54