Anaerobic digestion of poultry manure: Process optimization employing struvite precipitation and novel digestion technologies

被引:12
|
作者
Farrow, Cameron [1 ,2 ]
Crolla, Anna [2 ]
Kinsley, Chris [2 ]
McBean, Ed [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Guelph, Sch Engn, Guelph, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Guelph, Alfred Campus, Alfred, ON, Canada
关键词
alternative energy; anaerobic; biogas; CHICKEN MANURE; CO-DIGESTION; METHANE PRODUCTION; SLAUGHTERHOUSE WASTE; AGRICULTURAL WASTES; RECOVERY; RESIDUES;
D O I
10.1002/ep.12442
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Solid-state anaerobic digestion (SSAD) of poultry manure is assessed utilizing a combination anaerobic leaching bed (ALBR)/plug-flow digester. Struvite precipitation is employed concurrently with digestion to control total ammoniacal nitrogen (TAN) and prevent inhibition of methanogenic archaea. Struvite precipitation reactions are performed at a pH of 7.0 to minimize microbiological stress when leachate is returned to the digester. Results demonstrate an increase in biogas yield of 30% (470 - 607 L/kgVS(in)) during batch digestion trials and up to 235% during semi-continuous trials, when employing struvite precipitation methodologies. Methane content of the biogas is also shown to increase significantly (P<0.05) when employing struvite precipitation. Of the three organic loading rates assessed (1.5, 3.0, 4.5 kg VS/m(3)center dot day) during semi-continuous digestion, 1.5 kg VS/m(3)center dot day is shown to be the most efficient, with respect to biogas yield. (c) 2016 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Environ Prog, 36: 73-82, 2017
引用
收藏
页码:73 / 82
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Enhancing Mono- and Co-digestion of Poultry Manure by a Novel Post-hydrolysis Ammonia Stripping Approach in a Two-Stage Anaerobic Digestion Process
    Mohamad Adghim
    Majid Sartaj
    Niloofar Abdehagh
    Waste and Biomass Valorization, 2021, 12 : 6045 - 6056
  • [22] Enhancing Mono- and Co-digestion of Poultry Manure by a Novel Post-hydrolysis Ammonia Stripping Approach in a Two-Stage Anaerobic Digestion Process
    Adghim, Mohamad
    Sartaj, Majid
    Abdehagh, Niloofar
    WASTE AND BIOMASS VALORIZATION, 2021, 12 (11) : 6045 - 6056
  • [23] Anaerobic Digestion: Factors Affecting Anaerobic Digestion Process
    Lohani, Sunil P.
    Havukainen, Jouni
    WASTE BIOREMEDIATION, 2018, : 343 - 359
  • [24] Anaerobic co-digestion of swine and poultry manure with municipal sewage sludge
    Borowski, Sebastian
    Domanski, Jaroslaw
    Weatherley, Laurence
    WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2014, 34 (02) : 513 - 521
  • [25] The Effect of Antibiotics on Mesophilic Anaerobic Digestion Process of Cattle Manure
    Koniuszewska, Izabela
    Harnisz, Monika
    Korzeniewska, Ewa
    Czatzkowska, Malgorzata
    Jastrzebski, Jan Pawel
    Paukszto, Lukasz
    Bajkacz, Sylwia
    Felis, Ewa
    Rusanowska, Paulina
    ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (04)
  • [26] Technological Process of Anaerobic Digestion of Cattle Manure in a Bioenergy Plant
    Salkhozhayeva, Gaukhar
    Abdiyeva, Karlygash
    Arystanova, Sholpan
    Ultanbekova, Gulnar
    JOURNAL OF ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 23 (07): : 131 - 142
  • [27] Evaluation of poultry manure and goat cheese whey anaerobic co-digestion
    Ramos-Suarez, Juan L.
    Vargas-Avendano, Claudia L.
    Mata-Gonzalez, Javier
    Camacho-Perez, Angeles
    SPANISH JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 2019, 17 (02)
  • [28] Blending based optimisation and pretreatment strategies to enhance anaerobic digestion of poultry manure
    Rodriguez-Verde, Ivan
    Regueiro, Leticia
    Lema, Juan M.
    Carballa, Marta
    WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2018, 71 : 521 - 531
  • [29] The Economical Analysis of Cattle Manure Treatment by Anaerobic Digestion Process
    Coskun, Tamer
    Demir, Neslihan Manav
    Debik, Eyup
    Karadag, Yasar
    Kocyigit, Rasim
    Ozkurt, Mahir
    Akbay, Seda
    TARIH KULTUR VE SANAT ARASTIRMALARI DERGISI-JOURNAL OF HISTORY CULTURE AND ART RESEARCH, 2012, 1 (04): : 360 - 372
  • [30] Optimizing the logistics of anaerobic digestion of manure
    Emad Ghafoori
    Peter C. Flynn
    Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 2007, 137-140 : 625 - 637