Consumer lifestyle approach to US energy use and the related CO2 emissions

被引:508
|
作者
Bin, S
Dowlatabadi, H
机构
[1] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Dept Engn & Publ Policy, Ctr Integrated Study Human Dimens Global Change, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] Univ British Columbia, Sustainable Dev Res Inst, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z2, Canada
基金
美国安德鲁·梅隆基金会; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
household; consumption; embodied energy;
D O I
10.1016/S0301-4215(03)00210-6
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Historically, a sectoral approach (based on the industrial, transportation, commercial, and residential sectors) has shaped the way we frame and analyze issues of energy conservation and CO2 mitigation. This sectoral categorization, however, is limited in its capacity to reveal the total impacts of consumer activities on energy use and its related environmental impacts. In this paper, we propose an alternative paradigm, called the Consumer Lifestyle Approach (CLA), to explore the relationship between consumer activities and environmental impacts in the US. Estimates based on our methodology reveal that more than 80% of the energy used and the CO2 emitted in the US are a consequence of consumer demands and the economic activities to support these demands. Direct influences due to consumer activities (home energy use and personal travel) Lire 4% of the US GDP, but account for 28% and 41% of US energy use and CO2 emissions, respectively. Indirect influences (such as housing operations, transportation operations, food, and apparel) involve more than twice the direct energy use and CO2 emissions. Characterization of both direct and indirect energy use and emissions is critical to the design of more effective energy and CO2 emission policies. It may also help erode the false dichotomy of "them versus us" (industrial polluters versus consumers) references to the locus of responsibility for control of energy use and CO2 emissions. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:197 / 208
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Energy use, cost and CO2 emissions of electric cars
    van Vliet, Oscar
    Brouwer, Anne Sjoerd
    Kuramochi, Takeshi
    van den Broek, Machteld
    Faaij, Andre
    JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES, 2011, 196 (04) : 2298 - 2310
  • [22] Technology change in US iron and steel production - Implications for material and energy use, and CO2 emissions
    Ruth, M
    RESOURCES POLICY, 1995, 21 (03) : 199 - 214
  • [23] Does biomass energy consumption reduce total energy CO2 emissions in the US?
    Kim, GwanSeon
    Choi, Sun-Ki
    Seok, Jun Ho
    JOURNAL OF POLICY MODELING, 2020, 42 (05) : 953 - 967
  • [24] CO2 EMISSIONS INDUCED BY HOUSEHOLDS LIFESTYLE IN MALAYSIA
    Chik, Norlaila Abdullah
    Rahim, Khalid Abdul
    Radam, Alias
    Shamsudin, Mad Nasir
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS AND SOCIETY, 2013, 14 (03): : 344 - 357
  • [25] Energy Related CO2 Emissions before and after the Financial Crisis
    Sadorsky, Perry
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (09)
  • [26] Energy related CO2 emissions and the progress on CCS projects: A review
    Huaman, Ruth Nataly Echevarria
    Jun, Tian Xiu
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2014, 31 : 368 - 385
  • [27] Prediction of CO2 Emissions Related to Energy Consumption for Rural Governance
    Yu, Xitao
    Cheng, Jianhong
    Li, Liqiong
    Li, Fei
    Guo, Junyuan
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (24)
  • [28] Decarbonising energy-related CO2 emissions in the glass industry
    Zier, Michael
    Pflugradt, Noah
    Kotzur, Leander
    Stolten, Detlef
    Glass International, 2022, 45 (01): : 44 - 46
  • [29] Systemic risk and CO2 emissions in the US
    Kanas, Angelos
    Molyneux, Philip
    Zervopoulos, Panagiotis D.
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL STABILITY, 2023, 64
  • [30] Nowcasting US state-level CO2 emissions and energy consumption
    Fosten, Jack
    Nandi, Shaoni
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FORECASTING, 2025, 41 (01) : 20 - 30