Learning protein-DNA interaction landscapes by integrating experimental data through computational models

被引:7
|
作者
Zhong, Jianling [1 ]
Wasson, Todd [2 ]
Hartemink, Alexander J. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Program Computat Biol & Bioinformat, Durham, NC 27708 USA
[2] Lawrence Livermore Natl Lab, Knowledge Syst & Informat, Livermore, CA 94550 USA
[3] Duke Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Durham, NC 27708 USA
关键词
TRANSCRIPTION-FACTOR-BINDING; GENOME; YEAST; SPECIFICITY; RESOLUTION; EXPRESSION; SEQUENCE;
D O I
10.1093/bioinformatics/btu408
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Motivation: Transcriptional regulation is directly enacted by the interactions between DNA and many proteins, including transcription factors (TFs), nucleosomes and polymerases. A critical step in deciphering transcriptional regulation is to infer, and eventually predict, the precise locations of these interactions, along with their strength and frequency. While recent datasets yield great insight into these interactions, individual data sources often provide only partial information regarding one aspect of the complete interaction landscape. For example, chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) reveals the binding positions of a protein, but only for one protein at a time. In contrast, nucleases like MNase and DNase can be used to reveal binding positions for many different proteins at once, but cannot easily determine the identities of those proteins. Currently, few statistical frameworks jointly model these different data sources to reveal an accurate, holistic view of the in vivo protein-DNA interaction landscape. Results: Here, we develop a novel statistical framework that integrates different sources of experimental information within a thermodynamic model of competitive binding to jointly learn a holistic view of the in vivo protein-DNA interaction landscape. We show that our framework learns an interaction landscape with increased accuracy, explaining multiple sets of data in accordance with thermodynamic principles of competitive DNA binding. The resulting model of genomic occupancy provides a precise mechanistic vantage point from which to explore the role of protein-DNA interactions in transcriptional regulation.
引用
收藏
页码:2868 / 2874
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Protein-DNA Interaction: Effect of Helicity on Bubble Size
    Tabi, Conrad B.
    Fouda, Henri P. Ekobena
    Kofane, Timoleon C.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND THEORETICAL NANOSCIENCE, 2011, 8 (11) : 2220 - 2226
  • [32] Modeling Protein-DNA Interaction on Grounds of Quantum Entanglement
    Guevara, Yadira Medina
    Arruda-Neto, Joao D. T.
    Adan, Danyer Perez
    BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 110 (03) : 540A - 540A
  • [33] Protein-DNA Interaction at the Origin of Neurological Diseases: A Hypothesis
    Jimenez, Juan S.
    JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE, 2010, 22 (02) : 375 - 391
  • [34] MONTE-CARLO DOCKING OF PROTEIN-DNA COMPLEXES - INCORPORATION OF DNA FLEXIBILITY AND EXPERIMENTAL-DATA
    KNEGTEL, RMA
    BOELENS, R
    KAPTEIN, R
    PROTEIN ENGINEERING, 1994, 7 (06): : 761 - 767
  • [35] TYROSYL PEPTIDE MODELS FOR ACIDIC PROTEIN-DNA INTERACTIONS
    NOVAK, RL
    DOHNAL, J
    NATURE-NEW BIOLOGY, 1973, 243 (126): : 155 - 157
  • [36] Computational design of co-assembling protein-DNA nanowires
    Mou, Yun
    Yu, Jiun-Yann
    Wannier, Timothy M.
    Guo, Chin-Lin
    Mayo, Stephen L.
    NATURE, 2015, 525 (7568) : 230 - +
  • [37] SPECIFIC PROTEIN-DNA INTERACTION IN THE LYSOZYME GENE REGION
    SIPPEL, AE
    NOWOCK, J
    BORGMEYER, U
    MOLECULAR BIOLOGY REPORTS, 1983, 9 (1-2) : 150 - 150
  • [38] PiDNA: predicting protein-DNA interactions with structural models
    Lin, Chih-Kang
    Chen, Chien-Yu
    NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2013, 41 (W1) : W523 - W530
  • [39] Protein-DNA interaction: impedance study of MutS binding to a DNA mismatch
    Li, CZ
    Long, YT
    Lee, JS
    Kraatz, HB
    CHEMICAL COMMUNICATIONS, 2004, (05) : 574 - 575
  • [40] Protein-DNA binding specificity predictions with structural models
    Morozov, AV
    Havranek, JJ
    Baker, D
    Siggia, ED
    NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2005, 33 (18) : 5781 - 5798