A comparison of item selection techniques and exposure control mechanisms in CATs using the generalized partial credit model

被引:22
|
作者
Pastor, DA [1 ]
Dodd, BG [1 ]
Chang, HH [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas, Austin, TX 78757 USA
关键词
A-stratified design; Computerized adaptive testing; Exposure control; Polytomous items; Test security;
D O I
10.1177/01421602026002003
中图分类号
O1 [数学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
The use of more performance items in large-scale testing has led to an increase in the research investigating the use of polytomously scored items in computer adaptive testing (CAT). Because this research has yet to be complimented with information pertaining to exposure control, the present research investigated the impact of using five different exposure control algorithms in two sized item pools calibrated using the generalized partial credit model. The results of the simulation study indicated that the a-stratified design, in comparison to a no-exposure control condition, could be used to reduce item exposure and overlap, increase pool utilization, and only minorly degrade measurement precision. Use of the more restrictive exposure control algorithms, such as the Sympson-Hetter and conditional Sympson-Hetter, controlled exposure to a greater extent but at the cost of measurement precision. Because convergence of the exposure control parameters was problematic for some of the more restrictive exposure control algorithms, use of the more simplistic exposure control mechanisms, particularly when the test length to item pool size ratio is large, is recommended.
引用
收藏
页码:147 / 163
页数:17
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [21] Selection model and n-tier expansion of collaborative credit-granting guaranty mechanisms and techniques grounded on agile virtual enterprise
    Shu, Tong
    Chen, Shou
    Lai, Kin Keung
    Wang, Shouyang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2008, 3 (02) : 131 - 140
  • [22] Determination of a Differential Item Functioning Procedure Using the Hierarchical Generalized Linear Model: A Comparison Study With Logistic Regression and Likelihood Ratio Procedure
    Acar, Tulin
    SAGE OPEN, 2012, 2 (01):
  • [23] A Comparison of Crossover Control Mechanisms within Single-point Selection Hyper-heuristics using HyFlex
    Drake, John H.
    Ozcan, Ender
    Burke, Edmund K.
    2015 IEEE CONGRESS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION (CEC), 2015, : 3397 - 3403
  • [24] Partial liquid ventilation: A comparison using conventional and high-frequency techniques in an animal model of acute respiratory failure
    Smith, KM
    Bing, DR
    Meyers, PA
    Connett, JE
    Boros, SJ
    Mammel, MC
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1997, 25 (07) : 1179 - 1186
  • [25] Comparison of Sparse and Robust Regression Techniques in Efficient Model Selection for Moisture Ratio Removal of Seaweed using Solar Drier
    Javaid, Anam
    Ismail, Mohd Tahir
    Ali, Majid Khan Majahar
    PERTANIKA JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 28 (02): : 609 - 625
  • [26] Comparison of capacity in downlink WCDMA systems using Soft handover techniques with SIR-based power control and site selection diversity transmission
    Reig, J
    Rubio, L
    Cardona, N
    VTC2004-SPRING: 2004 IEEE 59TH VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-5, PROCEEDINGS, 2004, : 1999 - 2002
  • [27] Comparison of Backstepping, Fuzzy-PID, and PID Control Techniques using X8 model in relation to A* Path Planning
    Afandi, Mohd Noor Rasydan Bin Mohd
    Bin Hassan, Muhammad
    Suhardi, Glenn
    Zhou, Yi
    Danny, Lee
    2017 2ND IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING (ICITE), 2017, : 340 - 345
  • [28] Chaos control of RESs integrated power system model using adaptive higher order PID SMC and comparison of different adaptive SMC techniques
    Gupta, Prakash Chandra
    Singh, Piyush Pratap
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUTOMATION AND CONTROL, 2024, 18 (02) : 232 - 261