Can co-location be used as a proxy for face-to-face contacts?

被引:152
|
作者
Genois, Mathieu [1 ,2 ]
Barrat, Alain [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toulon & Var, Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS, CPT, Marseille, France
[2] Leibniz Inst Social Sci, GESIS, Cologne, Germany
[3] ISI Fdn, Data Sci Lab, Turin, Italy
来源
EPJ DATA SCIENCE | 2018年 / 7卷
关键词
Face-to-face contacts; Co-presence; Digital epidemiology; Complex networks; NETWORKS;
D O I
10.1140/epjds/s13688-018-0140-1
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
Technological advances have led to a strong increase in the number of data collection efforts aimed at measuring co-presence of individuals at different spatial resolutions. It is however unclear how much co-presence data can inform us on actual face-to-face contacts, of particular interest to study the structure of a population in social groups or for use in data-driven models of information or epidemic spreading processes. Here, we address this issue by leveraging data sets containing high resolution face-to-face contacts as well as a coarser spatial localisation of individuals, both temporally resolved, in various contexts. The co-presence and the face-to-face contact temporal networks share a number of structural and statistical features, but the former is (by definition) much denser than the latter. We thus consider several down-sampling methods that generate surrogate contact networks from the co-presence signal and compare them with the real face-to-face data. We show that these surrogate networks reproduce some features of the real data but are only partially able to identify the most central nodes of the face-to-face network. We then address the issue of using such down-sampled co-presence data in data-driven simulations of epidemic processes, and in identifying efficient containment strategies. We show that the performance of the various sampling methods strongly varies depending on context. We discuss the consequences of our results with respect to data collection strategies and methodologies.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Location choices of face-to-face interactions in academic buildings: an experience sampling approach
    Weijs-Perree, Minou
    Buck, Lorell
    Appel-Meulenbroek, Rianne
    Arentze, Theo
    ERGONOMICS, 2019, 62 (12) : 1499 - 1514
  • [32] Learning Gains in Introductory Astronomy: Online Can Be as Good as Face-to-Face
    Margoniner, Vera
    PHYSICS TEACHER, 2014, 52 (05): : 298 - 301
  • [33] "I can't lie to your face": Minimal face-to-face interaction promotes honesty
    Van Zant, Alex B.
    Kray, Laura J.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 55 : 234 - 238
  • [34] Can the Internet Replace Face-to-Face Teaching? A Medical Student's Perspective
    Korman, Avi Abraham
    Tannen, Amitai Jeremy
    Mahgerefteh, Michael Youhana
    ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2019, 94 (04) : 457 - 457
  • [35] Face-to-face handoffs and better physician training can improve patient transfers
    不详
    HOSPITALS & HEALTH NETWORKS, 2006, 80 (01): : 62 - 62
  • [36] Can distant teaching replace face-to-face dermatology education in general medicine?
    Idoudi, S.
    Duru, G.
    Eberhardt, A.
    Thomas, L.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL DERMATOLOGY, 2022, 47 (03) : 597 - 598
  • [37] Virtual vs face-to-face meetings. Can both of them coexist?
    Perez de Prado, Armando
    REC-INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 3 (01): : 5 - 7
  • [38] Surgical videos used for face-to-face and virtual oral assessment: Experiences of examiners and trainees
    Baatjes, K. J.
    Conradie, W.
    Edge, J. M.
    Archer, E.
    AFRICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH PROFESSIONS EDUCATION, 2023, 15 (03):
  • [39] What Can Be Learned From Couple Research: Examining Emotional Co-Regulation Processes in Face-to-Face Interactions
    Hilpert, Peter
    Brick, Timothy R.
    Fluckiger, Christoph
    Vowels, Matthew J.
    Ceulemans, Eva
    Kuppens, Peter
    Sels, Laura
    JOURNAL OF COUNSELING PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 67 (04) : 475 - 487
  • [40] Perceived Utility of Methods and Instructional Strategies Used in Online and Face-to-face Teaching Environments
    Steinbronn, Peggy E.
    Merideth, Eunice M.
    INNOVATIVE HIGHER EDUCATION, 2008, 32 (05) : 265 - 278