Immediate Versus Delayed Loading of Dental Implants in Edentulous Patients' Maxillae: A 6-Year Prospective Study

被引:63
|
作者
Tealdo, Tiziano [1 ]
Menini, Maria [1 ]
Bevilacqua, Marco [1 ]
Pera, Francesco [1 ]
Pesce, Paolo [1 ]
Signori, Alessio [2 ]
Pera, Paolo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Genoa, Dept Implant & Prosthet Dent, Genoa, Italy
[2] Univ Genoa, Dept Hlth Sci, Biostat Sect, Genoa, Italy
关键词
TERM TREATMENT OUTCOMES; OSSEOINTEGRATED IMPLANTS; FIXED PROSTHESES; REHABILITATION; PLACEMENT;
D O I
10.11607/ijp.3569
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: This study compared the surgical protocol efficacy of immediate and delayed implant loading in edentulous maxillae opposed by natural or restored mandibular dentitions over an observational period of 6 years or longer. The selected outcome determinants included individual implant survival data, progressive measurements of pen-implant bone resorption, prosthodontic survival and success data, and report of complications. Materials and Methods: A convenience sample of 49 patients requiring fixed implant-supported maxillary prostheses was split into two groups. The test group (34 patients) was treated according to the Columbus Bridge Protocol, which prescribes the insertion of four to six implants, including distally tilted implants, and load within 24 hours. The control group (15 patients) was treated via a two-stage surgical protocol of 6 to 9 straight implants that were loaded a mean 8.75 months after stage-one implant surgery. Two hundred sixty implants (test: n = 163, control: n = 97) were placed, and all subjects were ultimately treated with screw-retained full-arch prostheses. Results: Two patients dropped out (one in the test group and one in the control group) by the time of the scheduled sixth annual visit. The other patients were followed up for 75.2 months (range: 72 to 90 months). At the 6-year follow-up, no differences in implant cumulative survival rates were found between groups. Significantly less bone loss was found in the test group (mean: 1.62 mm) compared with the control group (mean: 2.44 mm). All of the original prostheses were maintained throughout the study's observation period and were functioning satisfactorily at each patient's last recall appointment. Conclusion: Patients who received immediate and delayed implant loading in their edentulous maxillae demonstrated similar survival outcomes. However, less marginal bone loss was recorded around the immediately loaded implants over the study's 6-year follow-up period.
引用
收藏
页码:207 / 214
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Immediate versus early non-occlusal loading of dental implants placed flapless in partially edentulous patients: A 3-year randomized clinical trial
    Merli, Mauro
    Moscatelli, Marco
    Mariotti, Giorgia
    Piemontese, Matteo
    Nieri, Michele
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2012, 39 (02) : 196 - 202
  • [32] Immediate nonocclusal versus early loading of dental implants in partially edentulous patients: 1-year results from a multicenter, Randomized controlled clinical trial
    Testori, Tiziano
    Galli, Fabio
    Capelli, Matteo
    Zuffetti, Francesco
    Esposito, Marco
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2007, 22 (05) : 815 - 822
  • [33] Immediate versus early non-occlusal loading of dental implants placed flapless in partially edentulous patients: A 10-year randomized clinical trial
    Merli, Mauro
    Merli, Marco
    Mariotti, Giorgia
    Pagliaro, Umberto
    Moscatelli, Marco
    Nieri, Michele
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2020, 47 (05) : 621 - 629
  • [34] Survival and Complications of Single Dental Implants in the Edentulous Mandible Following Immediate or Delayed Loading: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
    Kern, M.
    Att, W.
    Fritzer, E.
    Kappel, S.
    Luthardt, R. G.
    Mundt, T.
    Reissmann, D. R.
    Raedel, M.
    Stiesch, M.
    Wolfart, S.
    Passia, N.
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2018, 97 (02) : 163 - 170
  • [35] Survival and Complications of Single Dental Implants in the Edentulous Mandible following Immediate or Delayed Loading: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
    Nagar, Priya
    Yadav, Krishan
    Feroz, Shaikh Mohammad Abdul
    Gangadharappa, Praveen
    Gupta, Utkarsh
    Loganathan, Jeevanandam
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND BIOALLIED SCIENCES, 2023, 15 : S490 - S494
  • [36] Associated lesions of peri-implant mucosa in immediate versus delayed loading of dental implants
    Iliescu, Alexandru Andrei
    Zurac, Sabina Andrada
    Nicolae, Vasile
    Iliescu, Mihaela Georgiana
    Perlea, Paula
    ROMANIAN JOURNAL OF MORPHOLOGY AND EMBRYOLOGY, 2017, 58 (02): : 487 - 492
  • [37] Delayed versus immediate loading of implants: Survival analysis and risk factors for dental implant failure
    Susarla, Srinivas M.
    Cbuang, Sung-Kiang
    Dodson, Thomas B.
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2008, 66 (02) : 251 - 255
  • [38] Immediate Implants and Immediate Loading in Periodontally Compromised Patients-A 3-Year Prospective Clinical Study
    Alves, Celia Coutinho
    Correia, Andre Ricardo
    Neves, Manuel
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PERIODONTICS & RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2010, 30 (05) : 447 - 455
  • [39] A 5-year prospective clinical trial on short implants (6 mm) for single tooth replacement in the posterior maxilla: immediate versus delayed loading
    Mustafa Ayna
    Bastian Wessing
    Ralf Gutwald
    Andreas Neff
    Thomas Ziebart
    Yahya Açil
    Jörg Wiltfang
    Aydin Gülses
    Odontology, 2019, 107 : 244 - 253
  • [40] Immediate versus Conventional Loading of Post-Extraction Implants in the Edentulous Jaws
    Testori, Tiziano
    Zuffetti, Francesco
    Capelli, Matteo
    Galli, Fabio
    Weinstein, Roberto L.
    Del Fabbro, Massimo
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2014, 16 (06) : 926 - 935