The COLIPA strategy for developing and evaluating animal alternatives for skin sensitization testing

被引:0
|
作者
Aeby, Pierre [1 ]
Ashikaga, Takao [2 ]
Bessou-Touya, Sandrine [3 ]
Diembeck, Walter [4 ]
Gerberick, Frank [5 ]
Kern, Petra [5 ]
Marrec-Fairley, Monique [1 ]
Maxwell, Gavin [6 ]
Ovigne, Jean-Marc [7 ]
Sakaguchi, Hitoshi
Schroeder, Klaus [8 ]
Tailhardat, Magali [9 ]
Teissier, Silvia [7 ]
Winkler, Petra [10 ]
机构
[1] Auderghem, COLIPA, Brussels, Belgium
[2] Shiseido Res Ctr, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
[3] Pierre Fabre, Castres, France
[4] Beiersdorf AG, Hamburg, Germany
[5] Procter & Gamble Co, Cincinnati, OH USA
[6] Unilever, Sharnbrook, Beds, England
[7] LOreal, Aulnay Sous Bois, France
[8] Henkel AG & Co KGaA, Dusseldorf, Germany
[9] LVMH Rech, St Jean De Braye, France
[10] Johnson & Johnson, Neuss, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.toxlet.2009.06.313
中图分类号
R99 [毒物学(毒理学)];
学科分类号
100405 ;
摘要
引用
收藏
页码:S64 / S64
页数:1
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Nonanimal Alternatives for Skin Sensitization: Letter to the Editor
    Roberts, David W.
    Patlewicz, Grace Y.
    TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2008, 106 (02) : 572 - 574
  • [42] A strategy for the assessment of skin corrosion and irritation without animal testing
    Earl, LK
    Basketter, DA
    Barratt, MD
    Whittle, G
    Chamberlain, M
    TENSIDE SURFACTANTS DETERGENTS, 1997, 34 (06) : 446 - 449
  • [43] A tiered approach to the use of alternatives to animal testing for the safety assessment of cosmetics: Genotoxicity. A COLIPA analysis (vol 57, pg 315, 2010)
    Pfuhler, Stefan
    Kirst, Annette
    Aardema, Marilyn
    Banduhn, Norbert
    Goebel, Carsten
    Araki, Daisuke
    Costabel-Farkas, Margit
    Dufour, Eric
    Fautz, Rolf
    Harvey, James
    Hewitt, Nicola J.
    Hibatallah, Jalila
    Carmichael, Paul
    Macfarlane, Martin
    Reisinger, Kerstin
    Rowland, Joanna
    Schellauf, Florian
    Schepky, Andreas
    Scheel, Julia
    REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2010, 58 (03) : 544 - 544
  • [44] Can mutagenicity information be useful in an Integrated Testing Strategy (ITS) for skin sensitization?
    Patlewicz, G.
    Mekenyan, O.
    Dimitrova, G.
    Kuseva, C.
    Todorov, M.
    Kotov, S.
    Stoeva, S.
    Donner, E. M.
    SAR AND QSAR IN ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2010, 21 (7-8) : 619 - 656
  • [45] Skin sensitization testing strategy and safety assessment of topical ingredients: A case study
    Petersohn, Dirk
    Nathalie, Alepee
    Ashikaga, Takao
    Clouet, Elodie
    Cluzel, Magalie
    Del Bufalo, Aurelie
    Gilmour, Nicola
    Goebel, Carsten
    Hibatallah, Jalila
    Hoffmann, Sebastian
    Hutchison, Lauren
    Kern, Petra
    Kuehnl, Jochen
    Mewes, Karsten
    Miyazawa, Masaaki
    Van Vliet, Erwin
    Klaric, Martina
    TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2017, 280 : S45 - S46
  • [46] In vitro skin sensitization: Comparison of different methods and development of a reliable testing strategy
    Gehrke, H.
    Hopflinger, V.
    Huether, H. Hofman
    TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2016, 258 : S144 - S145
  • [48] A tiered approach to the use of alternatives to animal testing for the safety assessment of cosmetics: Skin irritation
    Macfarlane, Martin
    Jones, Penny
    Goebel, Carsten
    Dufour, Eric
    Rowland, Joanna
    Araki, Daisuke
    Costabel-Farkas, Margit
    Hewitt, Nicola J.
    Hibatallah, Jalila
    Kirst, Annette
    McNamee, Pauline
    Schellauf, Florian
    Scheel, Julia
    REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2009, 54 (02) : 188 - 196
  • [49] Comprehensive computational approach for predicting human skin sensitization as suggested alternative to animal testing
    Muratov, Eugene
    Alves, Vinicius
    Borba, Joyce
    Braga, Rodolpho
    Capuzzi, Stephen
    Silva, Arhur
    Kleinstreuer, Nicole
    Andrade, Carolina
    Tropsha, Alexander
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2019, 257
  • [50] DEVELOPMENT OF ALTERNATIVES TO ANIMAL TESTING IN THE USA
    FRAZIER, J
    METHODS FOR EVALUATION AND RECOGNITION OF ALTERNATIVES TO ANIMAL EXPERIMENTATION, 1989, 89 : 32 - 36