Influence of Steel Bars in Detection of Voids in Concrete Using Ultrasonic Pulse-Echo Method

被引:5
|
作者
Lipa, Leonel [1 ]
Navarro, Laura M. [2 ]
Pasquel, Enrique N. [3 ]
机构
[1] Pontifical Catholic Univ Peru PUCP, Lab Earthquake Struct, Lima, Peru
[2] PUCP, Lab Earthquake Struct, Construct & Mat Area, Lima, Peru
[3] PUCP, Construct Mat, Lima, Peru
关键词
flaw detection; honeycombs; pulse echo; reinforced concrete; ultrasonic; voids; SAFT;
D O I
10.14359/51715582
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
In this research, the influence of steel bars in the detection of voids in concrete elements using the ultrasonic pulse-echo method was analyzed. For this purpose, reinforced concrete walls were made that contain No. 3, No. 4, or No. 5 steel bars, and expanded polystyrene spheres 50 mm (1.97 in.) in diameter: which represent internal voids. Spheres of smaller diameter were not used because their detection is very low. An ultrasonic pulse-echo device of 50 kHz frequency transverse waves that uses a synthetic aperture focusing technique (SAFI) was used. The steel bars were placed with different separations to observe the effect they cause in a scan. In addition, the spheres were laid between these different configurations with the purpose of verifying if their detection is possible. Additionally, image processing was carried out to eliminate or totally reduce the effect of the steel bars in the scans. This research concluded that when scans are performed on strips with transverse No. 3, No. 4, and No. 5 bars, these would appear in the ultrasound image with a probability of 35.4%, 41.7%, and 62.5%, respectively. In addition, if the scan is performed on a strip with No. 4 or No. 5 bars, which have the same direction of the scan, they appear in large magnitude in the ultrasound images, so it is very difficult to distinguish if there is another material in these arras. However; in this last case, if the bars are No. 3, they do not appear in the scan. Oct the other hard, the spheres were located with a probability of 81.3% when they were located between steel bars separated by a distance greater than or equal to 100 mm (1.97 in.).
引用
收藏
页码:223 / 234
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] MEASUREMENT OF ICE ACCRETION USING ULTRASONIC PULSE-ECHO TECHNIQUES
    HANSMAN, RJ
    KIRBY, MS
    JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 1985, 22 (06): : 530 - 535
  • [22] Ultrasonic pulse-echo subwavelength defect detection mechanism: Experiment and simulation
    Yin, XT
    Morris, SA
    O'Brien, WD
    JOURNAL OF NONDESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION, 2003, 22 (03) : 103 - 115
  • [23] Ultrasonic Pulse-Echo Subwavelength Defect Detection Mechanism: Experiment and Simulation
    Xiangtao Yin
    Scott A. Morris
    William D. O'Brien
    Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation, 2003, 22 : 103 - 115
  • [24] ULTRASONIC PULSE-ECHO TECHNIQUE FOR VHF RANGE
    HEMPHILL, RB
    PENN, TC
    REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS, 1967, 38 (12): : 1809 - &
  • [25] ABSOLUTE ACCURACY OF PULSE-ECHO OVERLAP METHOD AND PULSE-SUPERPOSITION METHOD FOR ULTRASONIC VELOCITY
    PAPADAKIS, EP
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1972, 52 (03): : 843 - +
  • [26] Non-destructive assessment of concrete using the pulse-echo method - possibilities and limits
    Vogel, Michael
    Kotan, Engin
    Mueller, Harald S.
    BAUTECHNIK, 2018, 95 (02) : 148 - 156
  • [27] ULTRASONIC PULSE-ECHO INSTRUMENT LINEARITY MEASUREMENT
    BAILEY, JA
    MATERIALS EVALUATION, 1977, 35 (05) : 64 - 68
  • [28] PULSE-ECHO ULTRASONIC FINGERPRINT SENSOR ON A CHIP
    Tang, H.
    Lu, Y.
    Fung, S.
    Tsai, J. M.
    Daneman, M.
    Horsley, D. A.
    Boser, B. E.
    2015 TRANSDUCERS - 2015 18TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOLID-STATE SENSORS, ACTUATORS AND MICROSYSTEMS (TRANSDUCERS), 2015, : 674 - 677
  • [29] PREDICTED ULTRASONIC RESPONSES FOR PULSE-ECHO INSPECTIONS
    TEMPLE, JAG
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF NON-DESTRUCTIVE TESTING, 1986, 28 (03): : 145 - 154
  • [30] Characterization of an ultrasonic transducer in a pulse-echo setup
    Lopez-Sanchez, A
    Schmerr, LW
    REVIEW OF PROGRESS IN QUANTITATIVE NONDESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION, VOLS 25A AND 25B, 2006, 820 : 900 - 907