Optimizing Multiple Kernel Learning for the Classification of UAV Data

被引:21
|
作者
Gevaert, Caroline M. [1 ]
Persello, Claudio [1 ]
Vosselman, George [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Twente, Fac Geoinformat Sci & Earth Observat ITC, NL-7500 AE Enschede, Netherlands
关键词
Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs); Support Vector Machines (SVMs); Multiple Kernel Learning (MKL); informal settlements; image classification; PRECISION AGRICULTURE; LIDAR DATA; IDENTIFICATION; GENERATION; FUSION; IMAGES;
D O I
10.3390/rs8121025
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) are capable of providing high-quality orthoimagery and 3D information in the form of point clouds at a relatively low cost. Their increasing popularity stresses the necessity of understanding which algorithms are especially suited for processing the data obtained from UAVs. The features that are extracted from the point cloud and imagery have different statistical characteristics and can be considered as heterogeneous, which motivates the use of Multiple Kernel Learning (MKL) for classification problems. In this paper, we illustrate the utility of applying MKL for the classification of heterogeneous features obtained from UAV data through a case study of an informal settlement in Kigali, Rwanda. Results indicate that MKL can achieve a classification accuracy of 90.6%, a 5.2% increase over a standard single-kernel Support Vector Machine (SVM). A comparison of seven MKL methods indicates that linearly-weighted kernel combinations based on simple heuristics are competitive with respect to computationally-complex, non-linear kernel combination methods. We further underline the importance of utilizing appropriate feature grouping strategies for MKL, which has not been directly addressed in the literature, and we propose a novel, automated feature grouping method that achieves a high classification accuracy for various MKL methods.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Classification for geosynchronous satellites with deep learning and multiple kernel earning
    Huo, Yurong
    Li, Zhi
    Fang, Yuqiang
    Zhang, Feng
    APPLIED OPTICS, 2019, 58 (21) : 5830 - 5838
  • [42] Multiple Kernel Learning for Sparse Representation-Based Classification
    Shrivastava, Ashish
    Patel, Vishal M.
    Chellappa, Rama
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, 2014, 23 (07) : 3013 - 3024
  • [43] Semi-supervised classification with Laplacian multiple kernel learning
    Yang, Tao
    Fu, Dongmei
    NEUROCOMPUTING, 2014, 140 : 19 - 26
  • [44] Multiple similarities based kernel subspace learning for image classification
    Yan, W
    Liu, QS
    Lu, HQ
    Ma, SD
    COMPUTER VISION - ACCV 2006, PT II, 2006, 3852 : 244 - 253
  • [45] Discriminant Kernel Learning for Acoustic Scene Classification with Multiple Observations
    Ye, Jiaxing
    Kobayashi, Takumi
    Tsuda, Hiroshi
    Murakawa, Masahiro
    2017 25TH EUROPEAN SIGNAL PROCESSING CONFERENCE (EUSIPCO), 2017, : 1824 - 1828
  • [46] Learning Relevant Image Features With Multiple-Kernel Classification
    Tuia, Devis
    Camps-Valls, Gustavo
    Matasci, Giona
    Kanevski, Mikhail
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2010, 48 (10): : 3780 - 3791
  • [47] Hyperspectral image classification based on multiple kernel mutual learning
    Cui, Binge
    Zhong, Liwei
    Yin, Bei
    Ren, Guangbo
    Lu, Yan
    INFRARED PHYSICS & TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 99 : 113 - 122
  • [48] Optimizing Kernel Functions Using Transfer Learning from Unlabeled Data
    Abbasnejad, M. Ehsan
    Ramachandram, Dhanesh
    Mandava, Rajeswari
    2009 SECOND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE VISION, PROCEEDINGS, ( ICMV 2009), 2009, : 111 - 117
  • [49] Multiple-kernel-learning-based extreme learning machine for classification design
    Li, Xiaodong
    Mao, Weijie
    Jiang, Wei
    NEURAL COMPUTING & APPLICATIONS, 2016, 27 (01): : 175 - 184
  • [50] Multiple Kernel Sparse Representation for Airborne LiDAR Data Classification
    Gu, Yanfeng
    Wang, Qingwang
    Xie, Bingqian
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2017, 55 (02): : 1085 - 1105