Is the current network system of protected areas in the Atlantic Forest effective in conserving key species of bryophytes?

被引:10
|
作者
Silva, Mercia P. P. [1 ]
Kamino, Luciana H. Y. [2 ]
Porto, Katia C. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Bahia, Inst Biol, Dept Bot, Lab Taxon Briofitas, BR-40170280 Salvador, BA, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Minas Gerais, Inst Ciencias Biol, Dept Bot, BR-31270901 Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Pernambuco, Ctr Ciencias Biol, Dept Bot, Lab Biol Briofitas, BR-50670901 Recife, PE, Brazil
来源
TROPICAL CONSERVATION SCIENCE | 2014年 / 7卷 / 01期
关键词
Conservation Units; environmental suitability; gap analysis; Maximum Entropy algorithm; potential distribution models; Tropical Forest; HABITAT LOSS; CONSERVATION; NORTHEAST; DISTRIBUTIONS; COMMUNITIES; LIVERWORTS; REMNANT; BRAZIL;
D O I
10.1177/194008291400700110
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
We combined distribution data of bryophyte species with protected areas in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest, using models of potential distribution of species, in order to assess the effectiveness and representativeness of Conservation Units for bryophyte species. We performed potential distribution models for ten bryophyte species classified as bio-indicators for environmental quality and/or endemic to the Atlantic Forest, or endemic to Brazil (key species). Data from online herbarium collections, literature, and sampling were used to estimate the potential distribution of the species, based on the MAXENT method. We performed an intersection between the maps with > 50% of environmental suitability for the occurrence of the studied species and the maps of the Brazilian protected areas. Areas with the greatest potential presence of bryophyte species not superimposed on protected areas were considered areas of gaps in protection. The habitat suitability of the models for nine species was explained by the Mean Diurnal Temperature Range. The consensus map of high environmental suitability for all species showed significant gaps in knowledge about their distribution. However, three centers of potential distribution were recognizable: one in the Northeast, one Central and another one in the Southeast. The total potentially suitable area overlapped with 83 Conservation Units (only 27%), less than adequate for efficient conservation of the species. The Central Corridor was the region with the highest environmental suitability but also has only a few Conservation Units in the Atlantic Forest, and is therefore a priority for conducting inventories and creating reserves.
引用
收藏
页码:61 / U251
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Marine protected areas are not representative of chondrichthyan species assemblages in the Southwest Atlantic
    David E. Sabadin
    Santiago A. Barbini
    Daniel E. Figueroa
    Luis O. Lucifora
    Biodiversity and Conservation, 2022, 31 : 97 - 117
  • [32] Mapping of environmental fragility in Atlantic Forest protected areas through multicriteria analysis
    de Almeida, Marcello Pinto
    Lima, Gumercindo Souza
    de Cristo, Sabrina Lourdes Pereira
    Neves, Camila Nascimento
    Zanuncio, Jose Cola
    Campostrini, Ludimila Grechi
    Simao, Marcos Vinicius Ribeiro de Castro
    CIENCIA FLORESTAL, 2025, 35
  • [33] Anthropogenic Disturbances Drive Domestic Dog Use of Atlantic Forest Protected Areas
    Paschoal, Ana M. O.
    Massara, Rodrigo L.
    Bailey, Larissa L.
    Doherty, Paul F., Jr.
    Santos, Paloma M.
    Paglia, Adriano P.
    Hirsch, Andre
    Chiarello, Adriano G.
    TROPICAL CONSERVATION SCIENCE, 2018, 11
  • [34] Effect of humans and pumas on the temporal activity of ocelots in protected areas of Atlantic Forest
    Massara, Rodrigo Lima
    de Oliveira Paschoal, Ana Maria
    Bailey, Larissa Lynn
    Doherty, Paul Francis, Jr.
    Barreto, Marcela de Frias
    Chiarello, Adriano Garcia
    MAMMALIAN BIOLOGY, 2018, 92 : 86 - 93
  • [35] ASSESSMENT OF FLORISTIC AND STRUCTURE OF PRIMARY FOREST FOR SELECTING KEY SPECIES THROUGH MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS FOR CONSERVATION OF MINED FOREST AREAS IN THE PROTECTED AREA
    Salomao, Rafael Paiva
    Brienza Junior, Silvio
    Santana, Antonio Cordeiro
    REVISTA ARVORE, 2012, 36 (06): : 989 - 1007
  • [36] Are protected areas really protecting populations? A test with an Atlantic rain forest palm
    Quitete Portela, Rita de Cassia
    Bruna, Emilio M.
    Maes dos Santos, Flavio Antonio
    TROPICAL CONSERVATION SCIENCE, 2010, 3 (04): : 361 - 372
  • [37] Probabilistic graphical models for species richness prediction: Are current protected areas effective to face climate emergency?
    Maldonado, A. D.
    Valdivielso, A.
    Rescia, A.
    Aguilera, P. A.
    GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, 2020, 23
  • [38] Land Planarian Assemblages in Protected Areas of the Interior Atlantic Forest: Implications for Conservation
    Negrete, Lisandro
    Colpo, Karine D.
    Brusa, Francisco
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (03):
  • [39] Effect of humans and pumas on the temporal activity of ocelots in protected areas of Atlantic Forest
    Rodrigo Lima Massara
    Ana Maria de Oliveira Paschoal
    Larissa Lynn Bailey
    Paul Francis Doherty
    Marcela de Frias Barreto
    Adriano Garcia Chiarello
    Mammalian Biology, 2018, 92 : 86 - 93
  • [40] Balancing multi-species connectivity and socio-economic factors to connect protected areas in the Paraguayan Atlantic Forest
    Diniz, Milena Fiuza
    Dallmeier, Francisco
    Gregory, Tremaine
    Martinez, Victor
    Saldivar-Bellassai, Silvia
    Benitez-Stanley, Maria Alejandra
    Sanchez-Cuervo, Ana Maria
    LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2022, 222