Early and Late Reoperation Rates With Various MIS Techniques for Adult Spinal Deformity Correction

被引:13
|
作者
Eastlack, Robert K. [1 ]
Srinivas, Ravi [1 ]
Mundis, Gregory M., Jr. [1 ,2 ]
Nguyen, Stacie [2 ]
Mummaneni, Praveen, V [3 ]
Okonkwo, David O. [4 ]
Kanter, Adam S. [4 ]
Anand, Neel [5 ]
Park, Paul [6 ]
Nunley, Pierce [7 ]
Uribe, Juan S. [8 ]
Akbarnia, Behrooz A. [2 ]
Chou, Dean [3 ]
Deviren, Vedat [3 ]
机构
[1] Scripps Clin, La Jolla, CA 92037 USA
[2] San Diego Spine Fdn, San Diego, CA USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[5] Cedars Sinai, Los Angeles, CA USA
[6] Univ Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[7] Louisiana Spine Inst, Shreveport, LA USA
[8] Univ S Florida, Tampa, FL USA
[9] Int Spine Study Grp, Res, Brighton, CO USA
关键词
reoperation; minimally invasive surgery; adult spinal deformity; PEDICLE SUBTRACTION OSTEOTOMY; PROXIMAL JUNCTIONAL KYPHOSIS; SURGICAL-TREATMENT; PRIMARY FUSION; SURGERY; OUTCOMES; COMPLICATIONS; REVISION; IMPACT; SACRUM;
D O I
10.1177/2192568218761032
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design: A multicenter retrospective review of an adult spinal deformity database. Objective: We aimed to characterize reoperation rates and etiologies of adult spinal deformity surgery with circumferential minimally invasive surgery (cMIS) and hybrid (HYB) techniques. Methods: Inclusion criteria were age >= 18 years, and one of the following: coronal Cobb >20 degrees, sagittal vertical axis >5 cm, pelvic tilt >20 degrees, and pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis >10 degrees. Patients with either cMIS or HYB surgery, >= 3 spinal levels treated with 2-year minimum follow-up were included. Results: A total of 133 patients met inclusion for this study (65 HYB and 68 cMIS). Junctional failure (13.8%) was the most common reason for reoperation in the HYB group, while fixation failure was the most common reason in the cMIS group (14.7%). There was a higher incidence of proximal junctional failure (PJF) than distal junctional failure (DJF) within HYB (12.3% vs 3.1%), but no significant differences in PJF or DJF rates when compared to cMIS. Early (<30 days) reoperations were less common (cMIS = 1.5%; HYB = 6.1%) than late (>30 days) reoperations (cMIS = 26.5%; HYB = 27.7%), but early reoperations were more common in the HYB group after propensity matching, largely due to infection rates (10.8% vs 0%, P = .04). Conclusions: Adult spinal deformity correction with cMIS and HYB techniques result in overall reoperation rates of 27.9% and 33.8%, respectively, at minimum 2-year follow-up. Junctional failures are more common after HYB approaches, while pseudarthrosis/fixation failures happen more often with cMIS techniques. Early reoperations were less common than later returns to the operating room in both groups, but cMIS demonstrated less risk of infection and early reoperation when compared with the HYB group.
引用
收藏
页码:41 / 47
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Mesenteric ischemia following the correction of adult spinal deformity: case report
    Khanna, Krishn
    Berven, Sigurd H.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2017, 26 (04) : 426 - 429
  • [32] Kickstand rods and correction of coronal malalignment in patients with adult spinal deformity
    Mundis, Gregory M., Jr.
    Walker, Corey T.
    Smith, Justin S.
    Buell, Thomas J.
    Lafage, Renaud
    Shaffrey, Christopher, I
    Eastlack, Robert K.
    Okonkwo, David O.
    Bess, Shay
    Lafage, Virginie
    Uribe, Juan S.
    Lenke, Lawrence G.
    Ames, Christopher P.
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2022, 31 (05) : 1197 - 1205
  • [33] Predicting Clinical Outcomes Following Surgical Correction of Adult Spinal Deformity
    Sharma, Akshay
    Tanenbaum, Joseph E.
    Hogue, Olivia
    Mehdi, Syed
    Vallabh, Sagar
    Hu, Emily
    Benzel, Edward C.
    Steinmetz, Michael P.
    Savage, Jason W.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 84 (03) : 733 - 740
  • [34] Pedicle subtraction osteotomy in adult spinal deformity correction: Clinical and radiographic risk factors for early instrumentation failure
    Penalosa, Bryan S.
    Ramos, Omar
    Patel, Shalin S.
    Cheng, Wayne K.
    Danisa, Olumide A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2021, 94 : 266 - 270
  • [35] Adult Deformity Correction Through Minimally Invasive Lateral Approach Techniques
    Mundis, Gregory M.
    Akbarnia, Behrooz A.
    Phillips, Frank M.
    SPINE, 2010, 35 (26) : S312 - S321
  • [36] Does MIS Surgery Allow for Shorter Constructs in the Surgical Treatment of Adult Spinal Deformity? COMMENT
    Lucas, Joshua
    Liu, John C.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2017, 80 (03) : 497 - 497
  • [37] Radiographic outcomes of adult spinal deformity correction: A critical analysis of variability and failures across deformity patterns
    Moal B.
    Schwab F.
    Ames C.P.
    Smith J.S.
    Ryan D.
    Mummaneni P.V.
    Mundis Jr. G.M.
    Terran J.S.
    Klineberg E.
    Hart R.A.
    Boachie-Adjei O.
    Shaffrey C.I.
    Skalli W.
    Lafage V.
    Spine Deformity, 2014, 2 (3) : 219 - 225
  • [38] Early Postural Stability Changes in Patients Undergoing Correction of Spinal Deformity
    Keister, Alex
    Grossbach, Andrew James
    Toop, Nathaniel
    Mallory, Noah
    Gibbs, David Charles
    Xu, David S.
    Viljoen, Stephanus
    NEUROSURGERY, 2023, 69 : 30 - 30
  • [39] Analysis of National Rates, Cost, and Sources of Cost Variation in Adult Spinal Deformity
    Ramhmdani, Seba
    Bydon, Ali
    Passias, Peter G.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 82 (03) : 387 - 387
  • [40] Single-position Minimally Invasive Surgery for Correction of Adult Spinal Deformity
    Lovecchio, Francis
    Shahi, Pratyush
    Patel, Alpesh
    Qureshi, Sheeraz
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2023, 31 (17) : E590 - E600