Early and Late Reoperation Rates With Various MIS Techniques for Adult Spinal Deformity Correction

被引:13
|
作者
Eastlack, Robert K. [1 ]
Srinivas, Ravi [1 ]
Mundis, Gregory M., Jr. [1 ,2 ]
Nguyen, Stacie [2 ]
Mummaneni, Praveen, V [3 ]
Okonkwo, David O. [4 ]
Kanter, Adam S. [4 ]
Anand, Neel [5 ]
Park, Paul [6 ]
Nunley, Pierce [7 ]
Uribe, Juan S. [8 ]
Akbarnia, Behrooz A. [2 ]
Chou, Dean [3 ]
Deviren, Vedat [3 ]
机构
[1] Scripps Clin, La Jolla, CA 92037 USA
[2] San Diego Spine Fdn, San Diego, CA USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[5] Cedars Sinai, Los Angeles, CA USA
[6] Univ Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[7] Louisiana Spine Inst, Shreveport, LA USA
[8] Univ S Florida, Tampa, FL USA
[9] Int Spine Study Grp, Res, Brighton, CO USA
关键词
reoperation; minimally invasive surgery; adult spinal deformity; PEDICLE SUBTRACTION OSTEOTOMY; PROXIMAL JUNCTIONAL KYPHOSIS; SURGICAL-TREATMENT; PRIMARY FUSION; SURGERY; OUTCOMES; COMPLICATIONS; REVISION; IMPACT; SACRUM;
D O I
10.1177/2192568218761032
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design: A multicenter retrospective review of an adult spinal deformity database. Objective: We aimed to characterize reoperation rates and etiologies of adult spinal deformity surgery with circumferential minimally invasive surgery (cMIS) and hybrid (HYB) techniques. Methods: Inclusion criteria were age >= 18 years, and one of the following: coronal Cobb >20 degrees, sagittal vertical axis >5 cm, pelvic tilt >20 degrees, and pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis >10 degrees. Patients with either cMIS or HYB surgery, >= 3 spinal levels treated with 2-year minimum follow-up were included. Results: A total of 133 patients met inclusion for this study (65 HYB and 68 cMIS). Junctional failure (13.8%) was the most common reason for reoperation in the HYB group, while fixation failure was the most common reason in the cMIS group (14.7%). There was a higher incidence of proximal junctional failure (PJF) than distal junctional failure (DJF) within HYB (12.3% vs 3.1%), but no significant differences in PJF or DJF rates when compared to cMIS. Early (<30 days) reoperations were less common (cMIS = 1.5%; HYB = 6.1%) than late (>30 days) reoperations (cMIS = 26.5%; HYB = 27.7%), but early reoperations were more common in the HYB group after propensity matching, largely due to infection rates (10.8% vs 0%, P = .04). Conclusions: Adult spinal deformity correction with cMIS and HYB techniques result in overall reoperation rates of 27.9% and 33.8%, respectively, at minimum 2-year follow-up. Junctional failures are more common after HYB approaches, while pseudarthrosis/fixation failures happen more often with cMIS techniques. Early reoperations were less common than later returns to the operating room in both groups, but cMIS demonstrated less risk of infection and early reoperation when compared with the HYB group.
引用
收藏
页码:41 / 47
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Pseudarthrosis and Reoperation Rates in Minimally Invasive Adult Spinal Deformity Correction
    Kalavacherla, Sandhya
    Stone, Lauren
    Pham, Martin H.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2023, 69 : 153 - 153
  • [2] A systematic review of pseudarthrosis and reoperation rates in minimally invasive adult spinal deformity correction
    Kalavacherla, Sandhya
    Stone, Lauren E.
    McCann, Carson P.
    Saripella, Megana
    Pham, Martin H.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY-X, 2024, 22
  • [3] An Economic Analysis of Early and Late Complications After Adult Spinal Deformity Correction
    Williamson, Tyler K.
    Owusu-Sarpong, Stephane
    Imbo, Bailey
    Krol, Oscar
    Tretiakov, Peter
    Joujon-Roche, Rachel
    Ahmad, Salman
    Bennett-Caso, Claudia
    Schoenfeld, Andrew J.
    Lebovic, Jordan
    Vira, Shaleen
    Diebo, Bassel
    Lafage, Renaud
    Lafage, Virginie
    Passias, Peter G.
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2024, 14 (03) : 789 - 795
  • [4] How to Create Sagittal Balance in MIS Correction of Adult Spinal Deformity
    Anand, Neel
    SPINE, 2017, 42 (07) : S17 - S18
  • [5] Reoperation rates and impact on outcome in a large, prospective, multicenter, adult spinal deformity database
    Scheer, Justin K.
    Tang, Jessica A.
    Smith, Justin S.
    Klineberg, Eric
    Hart, Robert A.
    Mundis, Gregory M., Jr.
    Burton, Douglas C.
    Hostin, Richard
    O'Brien, Michael F.
    Bess, Shay
    Kebaish, Khaled M.
    Deviren, Vedat
    Lafage, Virginie
    Schwab, Frank
    Shaffrey, Christopher I.
    Ames, Christopher P.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2013, 19 (04) : 464 - 470
  • [6] Correction Techniques for Spinal Deformity
    Chan, Andrew K.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2024, 187 : 1 - 1
  • [7] Correction Techniques for Spinal Deformity
    Khan, Hammad A.
    Lau, Darryl
    NEUROSURGERY, 2024, 95 (01) : e20 - e21
  • [8] Adult Spinal Deformity Correction in Patients with Parkinson Disease: Assessment of Surgical Complications, Reoperation, and Cost
    Berreta, Rodrigo Saad
    Zhang, Helen
    Alsoof, Daniel
    Khatri, Surya
    Casey, Jack
    McDonald, Christopher L.
    Diebo, Bassel G.
    Kuris, Eren O.
    Basques, Bryce A.
    Daniels, Alan H.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2023, 178 : E331 - E338
  • [9] The Impact of Unplanned Reoperation Following Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery
    Pellise, Ferran
    Bayo, Maria Capdevila
    de Villa, Aleix Ruiz
    Nunez-Pereira, Susana
    Haddad, Sleiman
    Barcheni, Maggie
    Pizones, Javier
    Valencia, Manuel Ramirez
    Obeid, Ibrahim
    Alanay, Ahmet
    Kleinstueck, Frank S.
    Mannion, Anne F.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2024, 106 (08): : 681 - 689
  • [10] Analysis of mechanical failure associated with reoperation in spinal fusion to the sacrum in adult spinal deformity
    Inoue, Shinichi
    Khashan, Morsi
    Fujimori, Takahito
    Berven, Sigurd H.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SCIENCE, 2015, 20 (04) : 609 - 616