Shaking table test of dynamic interaction of soil - high-rise buildings

被引:12
|
作者
Ge, Qi [1 ]
Xiong, Feng [1 ]
Zhang, Jing [1 ]
Chen, Jiang [1 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, Coll Architecture & Environm, Chengdu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
soil-high-rise buildings; single column; shaking table test; dynamic interaction; Davidenkov foundation model; SEISMIC RESPONSE; GROUND MOTION; SIMULATION;
D O I
10.1080/19648189.2015.1110057
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Two sets of shaking table tests for comparative analysis were first designed and conducted to investigate the laws of dynamic interaction between soil and multiple high-rise buildings. The first set involves only a single high-rise building, and the second set includes a building group. Numerical results of the finite element models, using the Davidenkov foundation model regarding the dynamic non-linearity of soil, are presented and compared with experimental records. Experimental results show that the acceleration responses of structures in the case of multiple high-rise buildings are less than the response in the case of a single structure. The effect of the dynamic interaction between soil and multiple structures on acceleration responses is more obvious for short-period structures than those with long periods under EL Centro excitation. However, the motions of the long period structures in the two tests are almost the same. Opposite phenomena occur under the Shanghai man-made wave excitation. Moreover, the influence on the superstructure displacement is more obvious for long-period structures. The structure displacement in the case of multiple structures is larger than that in the case of a single structure under small earthquake excitations, but it is the opposite under strong earthquake excitations.
引用
收藏
页码:249 / 271
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Shaking Table Model Test of a Steel-Concrete Composite High-Rise Building
    Zhou, Xiangming
    Li, Guoqiang
    JOURNAL OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2010, 14 (04) : 601 - 625
  • [22] Contrast study of shaking table model test with prototype for high-rise building structures
    Qian, De-Ling
    Li, Yuan-Peng
    Liu, Jie
    Zhendong Gongcheng Xuebao/Journal of Vibration Engineering, 2013, 26 (03): : 436 - 442
  • [23] Simulated earthquake investigation of complex high-rise building by shaking-table test
    Ji, Jing
    Zhao, Shu-Ning
    Han, Xiao-Lei
    Zheng, Yi
    Huanan Ligong Daxue Xuebao/Journal of South China University of Technology (Natural Science), 2007, 35 (03): : 83 - 89
  • [24] Shaking table test on high-rise isolated building with tension-resistant devices
    Chen P.
    Zhou Y.
    Liu L.
    Hu K.
    Jiang L.
    Qu G.
    Zhou, Ying (yingzhou@tongji.edu.cn), 2017, Science Press (38): : 120 - 128
  • [25] Shaking table test on seismic performance of a large-span high-rise building
    Sun, Laite
    Bai, Yu
    Lai, Zhengcong
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01)
  • [26] Shaking table test and theoretical analysis on a 522 m super high-rise structure
    Xue H.
    Shu W.
    Lu X.
    Tian C.
    Gao Z.
    Zhang H.
    Li H.
    Chen X.
    Jianzhu Jiegou Xuebao/Journal of Building Structures, 2023, 44 (04): : 63 - 73
  • [27] Shaking table tests on dynamic response of high-rise building structures on liquefied foundation
    Dai Q.
    Qian D.
    Jiang Y.
    Jianzhu Jiegou Xuebao/Journal of Building Structures, 2021, 42 (07): : 30 - 37
  • [28] Soil beds of high-rise buildings
    Z. G. Ter-Martirosyan
    A. Z. Ter-Martirosyan
    Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 2009, 46 : 165 - 179
  • [29] Seismic resistance capacity of beam-column connections in high-rise buildings: E-Defense shaking table test
    Chung, Yu-Lin
    Nagae, Takuya
    Matsumiya, Tomohiro
    Nakashima, Masayoshi
    Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2011, 40 (06) : 605 - 622
  • [30] Seismic resistance capacity of beam-column connections in high-rise buildings: E-Defense shaking table test
    Chung, Yu-Lin
    Nagae, Takuya
    Matsumiya, Tomohiro
    Nakashima, Masayoshi
    EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2011, 40 (06): : 605 - 622