Improving Comparative Effectiveness Research of Complex Health Interventions: Standards from the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI)

被引:24
|
作者
Esmail, Laura C. [1 ]
Barasky, Rebecca [1 ]
Mittman, Brian S. [2 ]
Hickam, David H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Patient Ctr Outcomes Res Inst PCORI, Clin Effect & Decis Sci Program, Washington, DC 20036 USA
[2] Kaiser Permanente Southern Calif, Hlth Serv Res & Implementat Sci, Dept Res & Evaluat, Pasadena, CA USA
关键词
complex interventions; complex health interventions; comparative effectiveness research; patient-centered outcomes research; AHRQ SERIES; REVIEWS;
D O I
10.1007/s11606-020-06093-6
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction Complex health interventions (CHIs) are increasingly studied in comparative effectiveness research (CER), and there is a need for improvements in CHI research practices. The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) Methodology Committee (MC) launched an effort in 2016 to develop formal guidance on this topic. Objective To develop a set of minimal standards for scientifically valid, transparent, and reproducible CER studies of CHIs. The standards are intended to apply to research examining a broad range of healthcare interventions including delivery system, behavior change, and other non-pharmacological interventions. Methods We conducted a literature review, reviewed existing methods guidance, and developed standards through an iterative process involving the MC, two panels of external research methods experts, and a 60-day public comment period. The final standards were approved by the PCORI MC and adopted by the PCORI Board of Governors on April 30, 2018. Results The final standards include the following: (1) fully describe the intervention and comparator and define their core functions, (2) specify the hypothesized causal pathways and their theoretical basis, (3) specify how adaptations to the form of the intervention and comparator will be allowed and recorded, (4) plan and describe a process evaluation, and (5) select patient outcomes informed by the causal pathway. Discussion The new standards offer three major contributions to research: (1) they provide a simple framework to help investigators address the major methodological features of a CHI study, (2) they emphasize the importance of the causal model and the need to understand how a CHI achieves its effects rather than simply measuring these effects, and (3) they require description of a CHI using the concepts of core functions and forms. While these standards apply formally to PCORI-funded CER studies, they have broad applicability.
引用
收藏
页码:875 / 881
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] How Well Does the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute Fund Primary Care and Comparative Effectiveness Research?
    Balster, Andrew
    Mazur, Stephany
    Bazemore, Andrew
    Merenstein, Daniel J.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2019, 34 (09) : 1680 - 1681
  • [22] How Well Does the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute Fund Primary Care and Comparative Effectiveness Research?
    Andrew Balster
    Stephany Mazur
    Andrew Bazemore
    Daniel J. Merenstein
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2019, 34 : 1680 - 1681
  • [23] Implementation of Complex Interventions Lessons Learned From the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute Transitional Care Portfolio
    Gesell, Sabina B.
    Prvu Bettger, Janet
    Lawrence, Raymona H.
    Li, Jing
    Hoffman, Jeanne
    Lutz, Barbara J.
    Grudzen, Corita
    Johnson, Anna M.
    Krishnan, Jerry A.
    Hsu, Lewis L.
    Zwart, Dorien
    Williams, Mark V.
    Schnipper, Jeffrey L.
    MEDICAL CARE, 2021, 59 (08) : S344 - S354
  • [24] From comparative effectiveness research to patient-centered outcomes research: policy history and future directions
    D'Arcy, Laura P.
    Rich, Eugene C.
    NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2012, 33 (01)
  • [25] The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute Research Done Differently
    Newhouse, Robin
    Barksdale, Debra J.
    Miller, Julie Ann
    NURSING RESEARCH, 2015, 64 (01) : 72 - 77
  • [26] Patient Engagement In Research: Early Findings From The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
    Forsythe, Laura P.
    Carman, Kristin L.
    Szydlowski, Victoria
    Fayish, Lauren
    Davidson, Laurie
    Hickam, David H.
    Hall, Courtney
    Bhat, Geeta
    Neu, Denese
    Stewart, Lisa
    Jalowsky, Maggie
    Aronson, Naomi
    Anyanwu, Chinenye Ursla
    HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2019, 38 (03) : 359 - 367
  • [27] DEVELOPMENT OF THE QUESTIONS FOR PATIENTS WHO PEER REVIEW SCIENTIFIC REPORTS OF PATIENT-CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH INSTITUTE (PCORI) FUNDED RESEARCH
    Ivlev, Ilya
    Webb, Rebekah
    Hansen-Karr, Camber
    Vander Ley, Kelly
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2021, 41 (04) : E291 - E292
  • [28] Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute: The Intersection of Science and Health Care
    Clancy, Carolyn
    Collins, Francis S.
    SCIENCE TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2010, 2 (37)
  • [29] Patient-centered medicine and comparative effectiveness research
    Antonio Sacristan, Jose
    MEDICINA CLINICA, 2011, 136 (10): : 438 - 440
  • [30] Past as prologue: how comparative effectiveness research became patient-centered outcomes research
    Rich, Eugene C.
    JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH, 2012, 1 (06) : 475 - 477