Improving Comparative Effectiveness Research of Complex Health Interventions: Standards from the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI)

被引:24
|
作者
Esmail, Laura C. [1 ]
Barasky, Rebecca [1 ]
Mittman, Brian S. [2 ]
Hickam, David H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Patient Ctr Outcomes Res Inst PCORI, Clin Effect & Decis Sci Program, Washington, DC 20036 USA
[2] Kaiser Permanente Southern Calif, Hlth Serv Res & Implementat Sci, Dept Res & Evaluat, Pasadena, CA USA
关键词
complex interventions; complex health interventions; comparative effectiveness research; patient-centered outcomes research; AHRQ SERIES; REVIEWS;
D O I
10.1007/s11606-020-06093-6
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction Complex health interventions (CHIs) are increasingly studied in comparative effectiveness research (CER), and there is a need for improvements in CHI research practices. The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) Methodology Committee (MC) launched an effort in 2016 to develop formal guidance on this topic. Objective To develop a set of minimal standards for scientifically valid, transparent, and reproducible CER studies of CHIs. The standards are intended to apply to research examining a broad range of healthcare interventions including delivery system, behavior change, and other non-pharmacological interventions. Methods We conducted a literature review, reviewed existing methods guidance, and developed standards through an iterative process involving the MC, two panels of external research methods experts, and a 60-day public comment period. The final standards were approved by the PCORI MC and adopted by the PCORI Board of Governors on April 30, 2018. Results The final standards include the following: (1) fully describe the intervention and comparator and define their core functions, (2) specify the hypothesized causal pathways and their theoretical basis, (3) specify how adaptations to the form of the intervention and comparator will be allowed and recorded, (4) plan and describe a process evaluation, and (5) select patient outcomes informed by the causal pathway. Discussion The new standards offer three major contributions to research: (1) they provide a simple framework to help investigators address the major methodological features of a CHI study, (2) they emphasize the importance of the causal model and the need to understand how a CHI achieves its effects rather than simply measuring these effects, and (3) they require description of a CHI using the concepts of core functions and forms. While these standards apply formally to PCORI-funded CER studies, they have broad applicability.
引用
收藏
页码:875 / 881
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Improving Comparative Effectiveness Research of Complex Health Interventions: Standards from the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI)
    Laura C. Esmail
    Rebecca Barasky
    Brian S. Mittman
    David H. Hickam
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2020, 35 : 875 - 881
  • [2] The Future of the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI)
    Fischer, Michael A.
    Asch, Steven M.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2019, 34 (11) : 2291 - 2292
  • [3] The Future of the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI)
    Michael A. Fischer
    Steven M. Asch
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2019, 34 : 2291 - 2292
  • [4] The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI): Information for academic nursing
    Barksdale, Debra J.
    Newhouse, Robin
    Miller, Julie Ann
    NURSING OUTLOOK, 2014, 62 (03) : 192 - 200
  • [5] PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH INSTITUTE (PCORI)
    Selby, Joe V.
    ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2013, 45 : S56 - S56
  • [6] The PCORI Perspective on Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
    Frank, Lori
    Basch, Ethan
    Selby, Joe V.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2014, 312 (15): : 1513 - 1514
  • [7] The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) National Priorities for Research and Initial Research Agenda
    Selby, Joe V.
    Beal, Anne C.
    Frank, Lori
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2012, 307 (15): : 1583 - 1584
  • [8] From Comparative Effectiveness Research to Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
    Gerhardus, Ansgar
    Schmacke, Norbert
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVIDENZ FORTBILDUNG UND QUALITAET IM GESUNDHEITSWESEN, 2012, 106 (07): : 477 - 478
  • [9] A Patient-Centered Approach to Comparative Effectiveness Research Focused on Older Adults: Lessons From the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
    Mason, Noah R.
    Sox, Harold C.
    Whitlock, Evelyn P.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2019, 67 (01) : 21 - 28
  • [10] The Patient Voice Matters: Outcomes from a Patient Engagement Award from the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI)
    Rawson, Nancy E.
    Boateng, Katie
    Schrandt, Suz
    Murphy, Claire
    Nyquist, Gurston
    Trachtman, Jenifer
    Hunter, Stephanie R.
    Silberman, Pamela
    Joseph, Paule V.
    Naimi, Bita
    Garvey, Emily
    Dalton, Pamela H.
    CHEMICAL SENSES, 2023, 48